still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 03:51 PM
Original message |
Funny, when Clinton was caught Lying many democrats critisized him |
|
THERE IS NOT ONE republican in Congress that I know that has come forward and said it was a bad thing to out a CIA agent along with the operation she was involved with
Sorry, but when you have a party which demands that kind of loyalty over country, it shows their brutality
My country comes before any political party
They have no decency or sense of right and wrong
|
Zen Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 03:52 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Democrats don't get memos telling them what to think and say. |
SHRED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message |
edhopper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The hypocrisy of some "moderate" republicans remaining silent these days is despicable. Especially those who said they voted for the Clinton impeachment because of "The Rule of Law" and not politics. Where is the Rule of Law now?
|
ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The party demands discipline....in message and action.
Those who do not adhere, don't go anywhere within the party.
|
DIKB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
5. There's a vast difference between the parties |
|
Liberals want to see the right thing done, and are willing to tell someone they did something wrong, even if it's a fellow party member. Conservatives want power, nothing less than complete domination will satisfy them. They will protect a rapist, a drunk driver, a cocaine user, someone who has committed treason, a misdiagnosing doctor, an oxycontin freak, a military man who went AWOL during a war, etc. Rules, as they see them, are for OTHER PEOPLE; women, the coloreds, the poor, the liberals, but not for them.
|
Cocoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message |
6. the republicans in Congress did not care about the national security issue |
|
they scream about Hillary "criticizing Bush on foreign soil" and about Durbin "emboldening the enemy," but not a peep about destroying an intelligence asset.
|
ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
the only way they can deal with the hypocricy is to deny that Plame was a security/intelligence asset.
That's one of the themes they're spinning their collective asses off over right now....
The rank and file would never support destruction of an intelligence asset, so the ruling elite of the party have to spin it so that they didn't.
It's a sick situation.
|
dogday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
7. They are all good little partisan soldiers |
|
and do what they are told. How sad....
|
ClusterFreak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Maybe Hagel will be the first to step up... |
|
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 04:05 PM by Chimpys_Last_Stand
....and I think, some of these guys/ladies gotta start looking out for number one....it's just one thing after another for Bushco. Midterms coming up....gotta appeal to your constituents....Dubbya's a lame duck....Hagel's already talked about the W.H. "making it up as they go along"....
Let's hope so.
....but I ain't holding my breath.
|
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. Why would Hagel step up? He's not better than Lugar! |
ClusterFreak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. Just throwing it out there.... |
|
....judging by some of his recent comments. Nonetheless, I wouldn't bet on it.
|
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. Remarks don't mean anything... action does |
|
Too many times they say something that sounds good but when it is time to act they fail. It is probably their policy to get it out in print so that they can point to it at a later time for their constitutents.
|
asjr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message |
10. For at least 20 years there has been |
|
no Republican party. I don't know what to call the party in power today but it certainly is not a Republican party. When I used to live in "America" the parties seemed pretty equal. They had many differences but at least they were civil. This most corrupt WH has changed the rules to suit themselves and to hell with everyone else. They are not ashamed to go on TV and lie right in our faces. History is what they make up out of whole cloth. I can easily see insurrection in this country soon if things do not change. We will have a 2nd American Revolution and it will have nothing to do with tea.
|
wallwriter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Most Repukes believe in obeying.... |
|
and the rest are too afraid to speak up. At least a handful of Repukes have spoken off the record against Rove, not by name, though. You can bet that when the 2006 elections come along, more people will distance themselves from him when they start to hear from their constituents. But basically, they're a bunch of cowards...
|
movonne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I think this should be the Dems drumbeat.....Repubs thinks treason |
|
if it is their party doing it...does not one of them have any guts to speak out about treason within their own party...
|
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |
14. because Republicans lack intellectual honesty... |
|
history books will vilify them all because of it.:thumbsdown:
|
electron_blue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Don't you think Clinton set awful precedent |
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. He did? Funny... then why wasn't he prosecuted for it? |
|
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 04:24 PM by Cooley Hurd
Chirp chirp... :eyes:
On edit, STILL waiting for your answer... :boring:
On edit, STILL WAITING... :rofl:
|
tjdee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
20. About cheating on his wife? |
|
Yes, I lose sleep over that important national security issue.
:eyes:
|
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
21. Why don't you give YOUR opinion, instead of asking for ours? |
|
That's what DU is here for.
|
wli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-17-05 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |
18. the Republican Party is a terrorist organization |
|
Bringing the RICO/PATRIOT hammer down on them is long overdue and they richly deserve it. I wonder if Fitzgerald is up to that.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:19 AM
Response to Original message |