Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So Now Rove Is Saying His Source May Not Have Been Journalist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:09 PM
Original message
So Now Rove Is Saying His Source May Not Have Been Journalist
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 10:10 PM by ruggerson
He "might" have learned about Valerie Plame from another source in the administration who in turn heard about it from a journalist.

These people are flip flopping and changing stories faster than you can say "Treason."

"A lawyer familiar with Rove's grand jury testimony said Sunday that Rove learned about the CIA officer either from the media or from someone in government who said the information came from a journalist. The lawyer spoke on condition of anonymity because the federal investigation is continuing."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050718/ap_on_go_pr_wh/cia_leak_investigation;_ylt=AmcyuqEQ01XjK2QzVwGu84ms0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3OXIzMDMzBHNlYwM3MDM-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberace Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bolton, SCOTUS, and Plame
My favorite of all the speculation I've read on this matter:

That the intercepts the Democrats have been demanding in the Bolton confirmation and which the WH won't surrender, deal with the State Department Memo and the outing of Valerie Plame.

The reason the Democrats have refused to confirm without this info is because they already know the dynamite that is in these intercepts, and want to expose it.

Another bit of speculation:

Will Bush nominate an extremely controversial Supreme Court judge as a way of diverting attention from this scandal - not so much in hopes of having his candidate confirmed as to simply distract from the Plame affair?

And, speaking of the SCOTUS nominee, when discussing the candidate's qualifications, it might be fun to ask, and ask often, how the person feels about journalistic confidentiality, just to keep this issue in people's faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pk_du Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I too think there is more to the Bolton intercepts Liberace
either on Plame/Wilson or Dems. I doubt this administration will gice those up unless thru Fitzgerald.


And welcome to DU !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
21. If Bush DOESN'T execute the dreaded "recess" appointment
installing Bolton at the UN without a vote, I'm betting Bolton is the primary source of the Plame leak . . . and everyone from the top down knows it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. The way things are unraveling I doubt a recess appointment
will take place. I think it might have happened, but the focus on Rove, Libby and the source of the leak will not let Bush appoint Bolton, especially if he is involved (as I believe). They are nervous about how much information Fitzgerald has uncovered and how much he may still get.

Interesting point on SCOTUS though. I hadn't thought of that. Fortunately, the investigation will pay little attention to "talking points" or furor over a SC nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. The Clock's Run Out
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 07:16 AM by KharmaTrain
That recess appointment should have occured over Memorial Day or 4th of July recess. It didn't. There was no reason why Bunnypants couldn't have just rammed it down our throats and shuffled off to Crawford. Now maybe we're starting to know why.

The SCOTUS thing is also not quite coming together the way he was hoping either. This regime's longtime fear of a court pick wasn't the reaction from the left, it was from the right. Dobson and his ilk feel they are owed this pick and gonna like life real difficult within the Repugnican coven if they don't get what they want. A bill collector can be a real pain in the ass.

This regime has had to know for a while that Fitzgerald had something big brewing. The red flags had to really come out when Fitzgerald and the Judge in the case filed their brief with the SCOTUS in the case that resulted in the jailing of Miller and almost Cooper. That had to send one hell of a chill through this regime and that's what we're seeing now.

Truth be know...for the first time I can ever recall, this regime is frozen like Bambi in the headlights. The agenda was falling apart and this Rove mess will put it even further behind.

While the GOOPies are wishing for that big story to sweep this one away, the options of manufacturing the "big story" directly from this White House have diminished greatly. (Note I said "options" and "White House"...some of us know that means this regime will create a distraction elsewhere :scared:)

Welcome To DU...the party is just starting

:hi: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
27. Hi liberace!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. Welcome To DU Liberace!
Good To See You!:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Karl thinks about it and suddenly, in a flash, he remembers!
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 10:17 PM by joemurphy
Wait a minute...It's coming back to me now... It wasn't a journalist...the more I think about it...yeah it was...let me think...yeah, someone in government...Gosh, who was it? Hmmm...I can't remember...but it was someone in government that might have gotten it from a journalist....Yeah...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pk_du Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yup......drip..drip...drip...
forget the "outing of an undercover agent" ( for which he's at elast morally guilty by his own admission.......this Ratf*cker is on Perjury/Obstruction charges for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. so we can add that to the list of excuses?
Excuse ver 1.0: I didn't do it

Excuse ver 2.0: The media told me

Excuse ver 3.0: I don't remember

NEW IMPROVED EXCUSE ver 4.0 - I heard it through the grapevine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClusterFreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Just like the old R.E.O. Speedwagon song...
..."heard it from a friend who....heard it from a friend who..."
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Heard in from another Karls been messing around...
and seriously fucking up the neo-cons plan to take over the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
la la Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Or....
picture the dancing grapes with the faces of shrub,dickie,rove,scott, et al ---"heard it through the grapevine".....somebody photoshop that? ;>)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think they are about to sacrifice scooter.

Just a hunch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. that's my guess, too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. good NYT article on whole mess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Rove and the RW are squirming like a toad.
Where is the outrage from the Amerikan people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. We know it wasn't a journalist
Was it a purported Vice President? His chief of staff?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. did rove previously say it was a journalist? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Like the ever-shifting 'reasons' to go to Iraq
When a lie isn't working, they just find a new lie and try that for a while. It doesn't matter if anyone believes it. Confusion (in their view) is a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. That is a very good point
Float enough stories so people hear one of them and settle on that as the official story. Then, when a new spin is taken for a stroll, others hear it and accept that as gospel. Then, stand back and let the people fight with each other over which story is true (even if neither one is), thereby making sure that no one can ever connect the dots because we have to keep scratching out the answer to make room for the new one.

It is really the time for each one, teach one, from our side anyway. We could get lost in all the bull floating around here. We need to keep a straight timeline somewhere (Demopedia maybe?) of all the spin doctors words and how fast we have proven them to be false.

This is a great example. They floated the "heard it from a reporter" but then the timeline of what was printed and what was testified to didn't fit the story, so .... spin again to well, maybe it was a reporter, maybe it was a cleaning lady... maybe it was a dream.

Nixon was right -- it's not the actions as much as it is the coverup that bites you in the ass everytime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. Don't like his story? Wait five minutes. It'll change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michael_1166 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
17. Today is the first time
that the news about Karl Rove ("a top Bush aide") being in trouble got reported here in Germany's main stream media. Keep stirring, people - you're increasingly getting noticed. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
18. Interesting flip flop b/c republicans relied on this so much on Sunday
talk shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. The RW liars with their prepared answers didn't get the..
memo in time to change their lies.

All that matters is what the GJ decides. I still feel that indictements will be forthcoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
24. So, a journalist with NO SECURITY CLEARANCE
Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 07:23 AM by TWiley
has better access to classified information than Karl Rove who has the highest security clearance possible?

Knowing that the simplest explanation tends to be the correct one, I would have to say that the leak came from the "highest security clearance" (Rove) to the lowest one, (unnamed journalist) and not the other way around.

therefore ROVE is more likely guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Highest security clearance?
Not being a dink, but can you source that? It was my understanding that, at the time, Herr Roverer was Dubya's political adviser, not Deputy Chief, and consequently, had NO clearance to know things like that.

(which, if accurate, indicates that someone else in the WH - with proper security clearance - blabbed to Herr Roverer)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. I read that on DU actually.
The author (i cannot remember the thread) said that Rove had the highest security clearance allowed.

I do not understand who is allowed which clearance or by what critearia, so I cannot speak directly about this question.

I was under the impression that security clearance was granted by people in power. In this case, that someone would be shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
26. Man, are they dancing
Keep throwing those balls, people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
28. Those dam Reporters! We should cut off their access to Top Secret
material. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
30. I think this tactic is known as muddying the water
You stir up so much crap that no one really knows the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-18-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
31. If this were anyone other than Rove,
I'd offer a defense about people truly not remembering where and from whom they learn bits of information. It is a common thing not to remember where or from whom you learned something unless it was an incredible moment.

But I sincerely doubt this would apply to KKKarl Rove. I suspect he heard that tidbit and salivated over it, found some privacy and pleasured himself at the possibilities it presented to him in his attempts to publicly discredit Ambassador Wilson. Nah, Rove knows exactly where, when, and from whom he heard this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC