Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove story is about to go away

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:15 AM
Original message
Rove story is about to go away
Yep, it's going away and the press will be focusing on other issues, mostly a SCOTUS nomination.

But do not fear. Only one man can make it go totally away, PAtrick Fitzgerald.

The beauty is, when it comes back it will do so with a vengence because it will be when indictments are unsealed.

Keep the faith, DUers, and let this story go away. The impact of the indictments will be all the more horrendous for Bushco and all the more sweeter for us when the story comes back.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't just passively keep the faith. Keep on writing
As long as papers keep getting LTTEs on Rove/Plame, they will be interested in the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Although it will be pushed to the back pages, we must keep
vigil and not let it slip out of the news entirely.
We must keep the pressure on these criminals and bring them to justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nope. Not as long as Miller's in jail it won't.
The press is pissed. It's not going away this easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Poor Judith, her only hope is that the media will not forget her.
:boring: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Poor Judith...
...should stop protecting the guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. I suspect the SCOTUS nominee will be VERY controversial.
It'll be 2 birds with 1 stone: satisfy the fundies, take the doughboy off the front pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highnooner Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. This will come back when indictments
are handed down. Don't worry. It will escalate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I heard that on the radio yesterday.....I agree!
junior will pick a hard right appointee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. IF it does, it leaves on a bad note for Bush since he lowered his standard
very publicly, showing that he embraces questionable behavior and security breaches in his cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. I hope Fitzgerald surprises me,...
,...and begins issuing indictments before September. The sooner the better ya' know. This administration is seriously getting out of hand, sending out global death squads and making military preparations to expand the war in the M.E. in addition to expanding domestic surveillance. It's getting pretty perilous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Perhaps
It will be up to the bloggers to keep the story alive. They have that power if they press it.

I'm starting to think that a major reason for Bush scandals "going away" as you put it, is because the media gets bored with the stories after kicking them around for a few days. When you don't have a Congress controlled by the other party there is less momentum pushing the stories, and hence no official investigation going on, and no steady flow of juicy new information for the media to chew on. So they get bored and move on. Yes, they should be doing much of that investigating themselves, but investigative journalism just isn't what it used to be in this country.

Here you have a case where an official investigation is going on, so the story will probably come and go and come and go again. We'll go through periods where it vanishes from the headlines, like through much of last year, and periods where it will be high up in the headlines, like right now. In the interim, it will be up to the bloggers to not let the story die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. Did you see Charlie Rose last night? This story is serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. Last night on Leno, McCain claimed Bush would pick Fred Thompson.
He said it fits the pattern because he asked Thompson to "help" him pick a nominee, and that's what Bush did with Cheney before he picked him for V.P... I'm praying it does not come to that because I think he would actually get in. People "like" him because of his role in Law & Order, but his personal politics suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. an over rated actor for SCOTUS? sure, why not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I don't agree with it, but it's what McCain said........
The worst of it was when McCain said it, the people in Leno's audience cheered like crazy. That's the part that is bothering me. I assure you none of those people would have been cheering for him, if they knew his personal politics. He's about as far right as you can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Any Senator or ex-Senator is a slam dunk confirmation
With the possible exception of John Ashcroft, who burned his bridges as AG, but I don't think he will get the tap anyway.

There is a lot of pressure in the Senate to defer to colleagues for judicial or executive branch nominations. Senatorial courtesy. For senators like Bobby Byrd, who has been there for almost 50 years, these kinds of principles are taken very seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
16. It was the lead story on NPR this morning.
along with the comments that Bush "raised the bar" by stating he would fire anyone "convicted of a crime" rather than his previous statement that he would fire anyone "involved in the leak".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
17. Biden said something on IMUS...
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 07:22 AM by hexola
He said he was going on vacation in the first 2 weeks of August and would come back for the SCOTUS deal...it was sort of a slip...not sure if he was telegraphing something he knew...

So maybe its a still a month away...

Maybe the anticipation is distraction enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
18. we're always putting all of our faith into one person
who always ends up letting us down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Fitzgerald will indict. I guarantee it
73 indictments and 73 convictions in the Illinois Licenses for Bribes scandal.

He just indicted two more Daley cronies in Chicago.

He'll indict here. Fitzgerald moves on a case when it's time to move. Putting Miller in jail demonstrates there is something here and people will be indicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
21. Disagree...
All bad news, all the time for Bush and Company. It certainly didn't hurt the right to keep the Clinton bashing alive.

Remember, the media hasn't been on our side for years. I would rather not lose the momentum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC