Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Bu$h be named an unindicted co-conspirator?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:29 AM
Original message
Will Bu$h be named an unindicted co-conspirator?
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 07:31 AM by DoYouEverWonder
When Fitzgerald hands down indictments sometime this fall, will Bu$h become an unindicted co-conspirator? If he wasn't before, he certainly became one yesterday, when he picked loyalty to a friend over loyalty to his country.

So if Bu$h becomes an unindicted co-conspirator what does that mean for the office of the Presidency? Has this ever happened before and shouldn't Bu$h be forced to resign if it does?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I doubt it
I don't have faith in the system. If anyone gets fired it may be just a low-ranking intern as the "fall-guy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nixon was named an unindicted co-conspirator...
...and we all know what happened to him.

JMHO, but....Bush may not have been involved in the commission of the crime itself (the outing of Plame), but he sure as heck is involved in covering it up if his position is now that anyone convicted of the crime goes. Before it was anyone involved with the leak. Obviously he knows something or his position would not have changed. What a tell, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He certainly isn't going the plausable deniablity route
The deeper he gets, the more arrogent he becomes. It will be his downfall.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Loyalty to the man rather than this Republic and its Constitution is SOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC