Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where do you think more fraud could be found, Medicare or Defense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:41 AM
Original message
Where do you think more fraud could be found, Medicare or Defense
I have no knowledge one way or the other, just curious as to opinions here. Republicans always make a big deal about eliminating fraud from the Medicare system and I am sure there is a bunch but I never hear one peep about eliminating fraud from the Defense Industry. Why is that do you think? Is the Defense Industry completely without fraud? Are the six hundred dollar hammers a thing of the past? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. fewer doctors carry guns
anyway, this is one I can't answer. Except I suspect Defense because doing harm is part of their natural purview, but caregivers promise to do no harm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. A few years ago
the state of Texas spend $15 million on a computerized system to catch welfare cheats. They caught about a dozen people that had defrauded the state for about $16,000. Real value for the money-HAH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. That's interesting. Repugs are always saying . . .
. . . we don't need more tax revenue, we just need to cut on the "fraud and waste." And yet, when confronted with the facts, suddenly they fall silent. Hmm, wonder why . . . ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Defense.
War profiteering has had a lot longer to mature as an art.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Now THAT is an awesome quote!
And if you think about it, it makes sense. The amounts that people receive on welfare are relatively small, so even if corruption was relatively widespread, you still aren't looking at the equivalent of huge corp. waste. (ie Enron type scandals)

On the other hand, we give blanket 'no bid' contracts for billions of $$ to defense companies, with no stipulations on them, and expect good results...

All I can say is Henry Waxman is a God and I hope he nails all the companies that are walking off with millions of $$ in Iraq...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wasn't it the Defense Dept that "lost" over a trillion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Pentagon missing $2.3 trillion as of Sept. 10,2001. n/t
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 10:12 AM by vickiss
I'll try to find a link.

Report was due to come out approx. 9/10/2001, for some reason it was never released. Hmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. no big surprise
A bunch of Enron papers and John O'Neill got blown away, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Isn't that just the way it goes since this maladmin. has been in office?!
:puke: :argh: :nuke: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. there were lots of convenient bombings and "suicides" for the BFEE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Too many, imo. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoWantsToBeOccupied Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Defense. The budget is MASSIVE and Congress has no clue how $$$ is spent.
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 09:50 AM by WhoWantsToBeOccupied
Even DoD inspectors general have said they can't account for insane amounts of money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Defense contractors make the big bucks.
And they pass it on in political contributions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. by dollars or by number of incidents?
medicare probably wins by number of incidents since there are so many transactions every year. Defense - heck practically the entire budget could be considered fraud - hands down winner on the dollar side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. Let's see, now....
GE, Gen. Dynamics, Halliburton, Bechtold, Carlyle Group, et al.,

....vs. doctors.

I'm stumped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. Haha, is this a rhetorical question?
Given that the Pentagon's budget is a hundred times as big as Medicare, what would you guess? Not to mention that well-known history of hundred dollar hammers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. Look at the size of their budget appropriations.
It's Defense by a staggering margin, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. For sheer dollar volume you just can't beat the Defense Bidness. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. gee, its hard to say....
Edited on Tue Jul-19-05 05:11 PM by LSK


Im gonna go out on a limb and say Defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. Neither of the OP choices. I think that
Congress itself through pork spending is worse.

<snip>

Cost of Government Day for 2005 is July 4. Americans now work more than half of the year 185 days to pay their share of the cost of government. This year, the average American will need to work an additional 5 days out of the year to pay off his or her cost of government compared to five years ago. Ninety-seven percent of this increase is due to federal spending. To put the modern tax and regulatory burden in historical perspective, the American Revolution was fought over British taxes that consumed 3 percent of colonial income. Serfs of the Middle Ages turned over about one-third of what they produced to their landlords.

“In exchange for surrendering more than half of their working lives to the government, taxpayers get $1.1 million for alternative salmon product research in Alaska and $1.7 million for the International Fertilizer Development Center,” Schatz continued. “Taxpayers should be infuriated by the government’s ongoing waste of their hard-earned money.”

Earlier this year, CAGW identified 13,997 federal pork projects in its 2005 Congressional Pig Book, an increase of 31 percent from last year. The cost of these projects was $27.3 billion, or 19 percent more than last year’s total of $22.9 billion. The group also identified $1.3 trillion in potential savings over five years in its Prime Cuts report.

“Politicians are constantly finding new ways to turn Americans’ lives into a financial struggle,” Schatz continued. “Congressional excess is in large part responsible for helping push Cost of Government Day to July 4, such as $70,000 for the Paper Industry Hall of Fame and $100,000 for the Punxsutawney Weather Discovery Center Museum.

<more>

http://www.cagw.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=9054


Paper Industry Hall of Fame is a must see on my summer travels this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC