|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
BlueWolff (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 10:57 AM Original message |
Plames name not to be revealed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nicholas D Wolfwood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
1. Link please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
2. link? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
3. Oooooooooooo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wallwriter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:51 AM Response to Reply #3 |
17. My thoughts exactly. That would be very big. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
4. Full text and link in another thread: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
montanacowboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
5. Please link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
6. So, this is actually suppose to be on today's WSJ A3? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viking12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:21 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Confirmed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:32 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. So, WSJ confirms the memo was "classified" rebutting another,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:43 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Would you kindly post a bit of that,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Viking12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:48 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. See parallel thread.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 12:27 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. Fascinating. Thanks!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
8. In their world of newspeak, not reveal means must be revealed. ;-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
9. I wonder what the date on the memo is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ComerPerro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
10. Another memo indicated that bin Laden was determined to strike w/in the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Al-CIAda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:30 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. 52 such memos pre 9/11, but thats another treason. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Al-CIAda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:46 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Article/blurb- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RPM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
16. WSJ?!?!?! WTF?!?!?! WOW - you kno it must be bad when... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-05 11:54 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. maybe it slipped through the cracks... WSJ also confirmed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 02:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC