Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What if the polls still favor Gore to win?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:30 PM
Original message
What if the polls still favor Gore to win?
*sigh*

- He's not running
- He doesn't want to run
- He's a loser
- He's a liar
- He's boring

He also polls highest preference for president every time the question is posed.

I've been fraught with a battle ground of feelings about new and unknown candidates. Now is the time for us to be attacking each other, to meddle our choices against criticism. None of the candidates "who can win" are ideal for me... I feel like I'm being asked to settle for a Reagan over a Hitler.

And the man who can best do the job, who has shown the experience and success is sitting on the sidelines.

What if Al Gore is America's choice? What if Al Gore still polling highest? Will a draft in order?

I contend that America loves the good guy to come from behind and clobber the bad guy to save the day.

If the polls say it takes drafting Gore to have the best shot at winning, will you support Al Gore as your candidate?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. What if Jesus runs?
Would you vote for Jesus or Gore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarlBallard Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well
Jesus is the lord and savior, but he's never won the popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Jesus saves
So that would help the deficit.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Would Jesus vote for Gore?
Would Jesus lead in the polls?
Would Jesus wear a Rolex on his televiiiisiiooooon shooowww...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DieboldMustDie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Foreign born...
sorry ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Al said that he wasn't running
Even after he saw the Draft Gore momentum last Spring.

We have a finite amount of engergy. Let's focus on those who said they were running, and not on a guy who said he was not going to run.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fofer Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Unfortunately, I don't think it matters what the polls say.
I'm still sickened by the travesty that was "Election" 2000, and I would love to see Gore in the White House. BUT, I think that if he did decide to run, the Republican smear machine, aided by the press, would once again swing efficiently into action and systematically ruin his chances. I think it sucks, but I'm almost positive that's what would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. And how do you suppose that this won't happen to any candidate
that runs against Bush?

And again, with Gore, we have seen all these old lines to be lies?

How effective will they be in the face of "lockbox", desecration of Bill of rights, bankrupting of the nation, murderous fraudulent campaign of imperialism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fofer Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. I just think they have more "ammo," so to speak. . .
Edited on Sat Sep-27-03 07:37 AM by fofer
. . .against Gore, because they've had more time to develop it. And they seem to have a personal beef against him too because of his ties to Clinton, who of course they feel is to blame for everything (will that witch hunt EVER end, do you think?). Also, the press, for whatever reason, has it in for Gore. I don't understand it, but there's a clear bias there.

But who knows, I could be wrong. I would love to be wrong about this. I think that Gore has earned the White House. I just think the Republicans will do whatever it takes to keep him out of there, as they already showed last time in Florida. Maybe I'm giving the Republican machine too much credit, though. And of course if Gore decided to run I would support him wholeheartedly, no question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. I still want Al Gore to take his rightful seat and US to have our rightful
President.

And I still support a draft of Gore.

But I do not see it happening


Therefore:


Dea/Edwards/Kucinich/Braun/Lieberman/Sharpton


But NOT Clark or Kerry


Lieberman today stated that Clark was a REPUBLICAN FUNDRAISER just a short while ago. Is that true. It is linked at Drudge right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Closer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I agree with you Seventhson
Except you should take Lieberman off your list and put him down there with Clark and Kerry.

Poor Gore. I feel so bad for him, and I'd like to see him in some high position again soon. He got royaly screwed.

I don't think he will run, though one can never be too sure. If he doesn't run, will he endorse? Or will he wait until the nominee is picked?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Why care about what he was a short time ago?
So what. Don't give him the nomination. But him getting the exposure, gives the party gravitas, because now the charge that democrats are weak, is refuted with evidence.

The masses are moved by symbols. A prominent general, declaring as a democratic candidate is a symbol to a lot of people. It gives the party gravitas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. No.

I respect Gore, but at this point the polls are just an indication of name recognition.

We've got a bunch of good candidates, and Bush is sinking fast. We're in good shape for 2004 without Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. ABB =
Anybody But Bush could win this election!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. Then the polls would be wrong.
Al's not running.

This pisses me off almost as much as this "Hillary WILL run!" NOISE.
Yeah, NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.NOISE.

You spend brain calories on this "What if Al scores high in the polls" Masturbation or spend your time jacking your brain off over Hillary, that's just that much less energy you've got left for Job One, getting rid of the nasty Shrub that's taken root in Washington.

Shit, why not spend your time wondeing "What if FDR rose from the grave and told us he was gonna bring us a new 'New Deal'?"

A web forum for students of WWII history had to deal with a lot of threads like "what if Hitler had a Teleporter, and was able to bring in Klingons from the futre. would Curchill had surrendered?" and other like bullshit.The moderator/list owner banned all such garbage.

Al is not running. Hillary is not running.

Deal With It.

Sorry to be so harsh, but I think an intervention is called for. Get back to Reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. So are you saying you would rather lose to Bush than back Al Gore?
That was the question, BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
20. Don't put words under my fingers, asswipe!
OK, so I enter into your escapist fantasy and put all my energy into an Al Gore presidency. I write him, I post these stupid "Should we Draft Gore?" Memes on message boards, I make my own bumper stickers (because Gore sure as shit doesn't have any) and then, on that first Tuesday in November, when Al Gore is NOT on the ballot, what then?

I'll tell you what then. I'll stay at home, mouthing some mealy-mouthed shit about "the process has been co-opted, because the 'best man' is not on the ballot, so I'm gonna 'Send a Message' and stay home"...

That's what you're gonna do.

It's just like voting for Ralph Nader. You WASTE YOUR TIME having wet dreams about Al and Hillary throwing in at the last minute, you waste valuable resources that someone who HAS put their life and bucks on the line to get your vote has expended, and Bush gets handed the keys to the Oval Office again..

Karl Rove LOVES this "Should we Draft Al" and "When will Hillary announce" bullshit. Keeps our attention off the fact that his boy is strutting around naked.

There, can I make it any MORE plainer for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. False dichotomy.
The polls mean little right now. All they reveal is name recognition.

Here's the dynamics: About a third of the electorate will vote for Bush no matter what. About a third of the electorate will vote for the Dem ticket no matter what.

It's that last third we have to win, and these are people who are not paying attention right now. Believe it or not, most of these people do not recognize the names of many of the Dem candidates -- Kucinich who? Dean who? Clueless, yes, but they vote.

My guts tell me that even though they recognize the name "Al Gore," that's not a plus. The Regime has planted a "Gore is a stiff lying loser" meme into the public consciousness that will be hard to overcome, false though it is.

My guts tell me we'll be better off with a fresh face; an outsider. This is why Dean and Clark are generating excitement -- gut instinct is telling a lot of us they have the best shot at clubbing Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QERTY Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. You Are Forgetting That The Electorate Is Not Static
The true silent majority are the non-voters. I'm estimating that a third of them don't vote because they believe the process is corrupt and that all the candidates are co-opted shills for business. We should never forget that they CAN be mobilized by the right candidate. They are an IMMENSE reserve of power that are waiting for a breath of fresh air from our failing system. If they become energized, Shrub could be the last Repug ever to hold the presidency. Rather than veering right as the party has been doing for the past decade, perhaps a little fucking HONESTY in a candidate would do wonders. What would happen if the Dem candidate said, "If you make less than 60K a year, you will pay NO federal income tax."? Do you think they would get votes? Do you think capital flight would destroy our economy at a greater rate than it is being destroyed at present? It is about fucking time we had a class war! Believe me, in a class war, the victory of working people is a surety.
Third-wave policies and "free trade"ers are a major part of the problem, not, as the DNC seems to believe, the solution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
16. I wish he were running, but he's not.
So, I moved on.. But if he changes his mind I would welcome him with open arms. There could not be a better team for America than Gore/Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NicRic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Gore/Clark !
That would definitly be the Democrat dream team ! In this time of uncalled for recalls and stolen elections ,I would not be shocked by anything .Like a sudden realazation that we want a foresure win in 2004. That would be an unbeatable combination of exprience, both economic and milatary ! Gore/Clark , I like the sound of that ! Both of Bill's buddies kicking the current theif out of office !What a hoot that would be . The best is this is one sure way the get the smirk off the idiots face !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
19. If you have to say "poor Gore"
that is exactly why it can't happen. He can't or won't (or both) overcome the opposition(lunkheaded as it is in the despised DLC seatwarmers). Only Clinton is freewheeling around superior to the garbage from the bully pulpit. If Gore had been doing that and reforging the party...but no. Now everyone gets their say and the divisions will end- along with a few faded careers. And despite the injustice we do have good candidates on a par, but uniquely different than Gore.

Luckily our party has no poverty of talent nor bankruptcy as in the hijacked GOP. The polls are flattering and a sign of the realization of THE MISTAKE or THE CRIME and so Gore is still a huge symbol and should stay active. In fact, he is not a distraction or liability and is in a great position to at least exact some satisfaction.

We have a heartbreaking list of very good men who should have been President. They all got shafted from the blindside. Not getting shafted is the key to victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. I would drop everything I am doing to work for Gore
Not just because it is the right thing to do to heal 2000, but also because he is the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romberry Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
22. The only way I can see Gore running...
...is if a deadlocked Democratic convention drafted him.

I'm a big supporter of Al Gore. I think he's the rightful President of the United States. If he ran, I'd have to think about splitting my support in terms of time and money with Howard Dean. Unfortunately, even with a ready made platform built on "Remember 2000? We were right!", I don't think Big Al is getting into the race.

I know he loves his country but he has his life back, out of the fishbowl of 24 hour security and public opinion. I can see how after years of dedicated service he might be very reluctant to get back in the ring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QERTY Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
24. Gore Let Them Steal It!
I blame Gore (and Nader) for Bush! I like Al and I think he would have been a decent President, but he is so lacking in charisma and "likeability" that he should be relegated to supporting roles. Gore's performance in the "debates" was pathetic. How can anyone not absolutely destroy Shrub on the podium. Let's see here: AWOL, crooked financial dealings, religious fanatic, just plain stupid. Amazingly, Gore failed to call Bush on any of it effectively. The fact that the polls show Al getting a good share are an anamoly based on simple name recognition, nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romberry Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Just how do you think Gore...
..."let them steal" the election? Is that like the woman in a skirt "just asking" to be raped.

Gore did clobber Bush in two out of three debates. It wasn't even close. The third debate was like watching a heavyweight boxer pummel Pee Wee Herman. It was only the Mighty Wurlitzer playing their music into the echo chamber that was able to spin debates one and three any other way. Most people that say Bush won the debates never even watched them. They got their info from the the talking heads and the papers that were printing up RNC blast fax oppo resarch as fast as they could lay their hands on it.

As far as your "anomaly" on Gore's polls goes, perhaps you have forgotten: Gore got more votes than DimSun and now, in retrospect, a lot of voters who did vote for DimSun because they thought he would govern as a "moderate" and with "compassion" know better.

Gore didn't "let them steal" anything any more than the woman in a skirt is "just asking" to be raped. His campaign certainly had its flaws but never forget, Gore received more votes than any Democratic presidential candidate in history. Not too shabby a result, especially if the USSC had not raped democracy by stopping the FSSC's order to recount all the votes statewide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QERTY Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Who's In The Oval Office?
Gore is a weakling. Give it up. The election shouldn't even have been close. Bush can't speak English. Bush can't do math. Bush sounds drunk (and might be). Bush's stint as Texas Governor was as marked by abject failure as were his business ventures.
THE ELECTION SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN CLOSE!
Gore was so weak he couldn't beat Shrub by a decisive margin. He failed, now we are reaping the bitter harvest. Don't EVEN try to let it happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theemu Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
25. "I feel like I'm being asked to settle for a Reagan over a Hitler."
Jesus fucking Christ.

I can't even respond to this besides to say it's one of the more moronic statements I've heard in weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC