Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm giving Roberts a fair shake...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
opusprime Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:06 PM
Original message
I'm giving Roberts a fair shake...
I know that at the outset this guy looks like a RW toadie, but they thought that about David Souter as well. I've already read on several conservative threads that they are scared this guy could easily be a Souter type of Judge.

His record on the bench is almost non-existent. If anything he is extremely underqualified. Most of his career was spent as corporate legal hack, and a water boy for the GOP.

Yes, his personal views are conservative, but at times in my life, some of my views were conservative. Some still are. I disagreed with the Liberals on the bench on some serious issues, Medical Marijuana and Eminent Domain most recently.

I think Roberts should be given a fair hearing. I dont want to hear about his wife, his divorce, his drug use, his drunk driving, his daughter's pregnancy, none of it. I dont want his family destroyed, and I dont want his kids to need protection.

I'm giving him a fair shake...

and if I dont like him... well then we can destroy his family. (kidding)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree as a male I give mine a fair shake after I piss. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. My recomendation
Grasp him around the neck when giving the fair shake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Mods - please ban this user
Skinner has already dictated his view. We must oppose everyone associated with Bush and the neocons. We must learn to hate without thinking first.

This user is going against the group think. The last thing we need around here is free thinking.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opusprime Donating Member (292 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. You got me...
I read that title and thought... oh know... I didnt want to get booted. :rofl: too funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. you are funny
hm....... never did well with the group think to do, but.......i dont agree with the op of having any optimism with this man. i dont trust him for the simple fact he is so connected to bush and bush stuff. everyone has dirty hands working for bush

as far as teasing hte wife and kids, boooooo. i agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's the "neener, neener, I'm here for life" aspect of all of this
that intrigues me.

What do they do when they realize that they can not lose their job, no matter who put them there.

I dunno. I'm more on team Rove/DSM at the mo'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unfortunately,
you'll never know until he's voted in for life.


Something wrong with this system. :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. thats the bitch of being on the losing end of this election
why people fought so hard and were so passionate for bush not winning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. One of many.
Literally, lives in the balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NAO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Religious Reich is NOT Screaming...that is all you need to know
If the Christians are not pissed off as hell (like they were when that liberal sap Alberto Gonzales was floated) then we are in deep doo-doo.

The Christians know their stuff and they know who is a moderate and who is moderate-to-rightest, and who is a hard-core Reicher. They will not tolerate anyone who is even remotely moderate or merely conservative (note their contempt for John McCain).

Any SCOTUS candidate that does not produce outcry from the Religious Reich is VERY VERY BAD NEWS. These people are not known for compromise, nor for holding their tongues. Thus they are a perfect, highly sensitive barometer/litmus test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. what's your take on Coulter's attack on Roberts?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. shes a moron???
Bush has fooled her like he fools a lot of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. that's your whole analysis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. yeah, took me a whole 30 minutes to frame it
You like? :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. it was a little skimpy as food for thought....
I had two thoughts:

1) her suspicions resonate with what the original poster here thinks: Roberts may be a Souter. And she has an audience on the religious right.

2) she attacked Roberts just so the left couldn't say the right was unified on Roberts. But her piece is very nasty, so I don't know about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. like I said, Bush has fooled her like he has others
This guys lack of record makes things questionable for both sides. But the simple fact that Bush nominated him seals the deal for me. Nothing Bush has done has been by accident, he always has a hidden agenda even thou things at 1st look like they are legit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I've always been puzzled....
that on the one hand, so many people say Bush is an idiot and a moron, and on the other hand, ascribe to him the cleverest schemes. I think it's possible he made a mistake with Roberts. The same mistake that was made with Earl Warren, Souter and countless others... including to some degree, O'Connor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. both possibilities could be true
Bush could be an idiot, but the man behind the curtain might not be. Hopefully hes going to jail soon thou.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. I'm rootin for it as hard as you
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. nice post
I don't necessarily agree or disagree.... I just appreciate the tone and the alternative point of view. Way too little of that here. I was losing my interest in DU because of the rigid thinking. Something like this keeps me hanging in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. Maybe you should learn about his wife
snip

"July 21, 2005—Yet another first for our boundary-breaching White House: for the first time in American history, we're going to have a justice on the high court whose spouse facilitates financing and putting together global satellite systems.

"Also, the firm in which she is a partner, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, emphasizes among other things its expertise in facilitating business in Iraq:

"We offer one-stop service to clients pursuing projects in Iraq, from solicitation and RFP counseling to working with key government and multilateral agencies, and from initially penetrating the Iraqi marketplace to final project implementation. Our attorneys are recognized as leaders in their fields, and at the cutting-edge in a variety of disciplines relevant to Iraq reconstruction. A number have served in senior government positions in key agencies–including the Departments of Transportation, Navy, Justice and Commerce, as well as the Agency for International Development (USAID) and the World Bank."

http://onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/072105Burns/072105burns.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. i just did....i take back what i said about the wife already, lol n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. yeah, lesson learned is never underestimate the bushie crime family
they have so much shit up their sleeves it's unreal!

and there's always more to it then meets the eye.

i know at first it seemed like a perfect little american family/deal/whatever--but we have to remember that so often things aren't what they appear to be

and the skeletons in the closets of this administration and everyone connected with them......could make an army.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. ok, this is a GEORGE W BUSH Nominee
BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID.

Has * done anything that didnt have a hidden agenda or was just a flat out lie or blown promise??? Why the hell would this be any different.

THIS GUY IS HERE TO DESTROY ROE VS WADE, MAKE NO MISTAKE.

THIS IS THE SHRUB. THIS IS ROVE.

And dont forget Bush's Dred Scott ploy during the debates last year. That was a clear message to the Pro Life crowd about who his nominee would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-20-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Right. Problem is: he gets to nominate. And the Senate is dominated by
his party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
27. Sure thing, chimp is all of a sudden doing a 180 and this time
he is on the level and it's ok.:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC