We're fightin' em' in England so's we don't have to fight em' here.

[mopaul]

seems logical

[BurtWorm]

1. Pretzel logical.

:thumbsup:

[bennywhale]

2. too right. Teflon tony was only too happy to place us as a sandbag

to America's empire building.

[Javaman]

3. We are fighting them in Iceland so we don't have to fight them here...

we are fighting them in greenland so we don't have to fight them here...

we are fighting them in Maine so we...oops!

The difference between moron* and the terrorists is very simple. Moron* believes with a quick military he can win anything.
The terrorists have nothing but time on their side. they are in no rush to do a thing.

At the rate things are going, we should be getting our own suicide bombers here in about 2 years.

[Supersedeas]

4. British human shields are just a good as Iraqi ones, I suppose

[Ready4Change]

5. So post 9/11, why not "Fight in NY so we don't fight in your town?

[Lannes]

6. and Madrid,and Bali......

[alkaline9]

7. What scares me most is...

...that the American people got tricked into re-electing this fool once already. What would happen if terrorists attacked our soil again? Would it potentially trick Americans to vote Red again? Because they can protect us better??? BULLSHIT! You and I know it, but what about 51% of voters?

I'm less scared of terrorists, and more scared of a repuke administration at this point.

Thoughts?