Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

* * TOP SECRET * *

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:51 PM
Original message
* * TOP SECRET * *
Not "Secret", but "Top Secret". It is now being reported that the memo that had Valerie Wilson's name on it was stamped "Top Secret". No one could read it and not know its significance. But one has to wonder where Robert Novak got her maiden name, Plame ?? Why did they withhold this information? Why not just come out and say it was "Top Secret"? Dribble...dribble...dribble...Stonewall and coverup...It always looks worse when it comes out just a bit at a time. Why not just come clean and get it over with??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oo-oo-oo-oo-oo-oo, I think they daren't come clean on this one. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. it'a been reported before today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Top secret
Because of the extreme importance to the national security of Top Secret information and information controlled within approved Special Access Programs, employees are not permitted to work alone in areas where such information is in use or stored and accessible by those employees. This general policy is an extra safeguarding measure for the nation's most vital classified information and it is not intended to cast doubt on the integrity of DoD employees. The policy does not apply in those situations where one employee with access is left alone for brief periods during normal duty hours. When compelling operational requirements indicate the need, DoD Component heads may waive this requirement in specific, limited cases.

http://www.ostgate.com/classification.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. "It always looks worse when it comes out just a bit at a time."
You betcha.

How about that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. My experience with classified information
is that, when a document contains information of varying degrees of secrecy, each paragraph has its own classification (Nonclassified, Confidential, Secret, Top Secret, and further compartmentalizations as necessary), and the document as a whole is classified at the same level as the most secret paragraph. This way, information can be redacted according to each reader's clearance.

So the fact that the memo as a whole was TS doesn't mean each paragraph was also TS, only that some info contained in it was TS. I read earlier today that the paragraph containing the Plame info was only "Secret." I look forward to reading the article tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTD Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. WSJ is to report that the paragraph was TS - NOFORN
Not only was it Top Secret but it was also classified as not to be shared with foreign intelligence services, even those from friendly nations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC