Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Administration blocks release of Abu Ghraib photos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:58 PM
Original message
Bush Administration blocks release of Abu Ghraib photos
Booman Tribune:

These photos, from the CD provided to U.S. Army officials by Army reservist Joseph Darby in April 2004, were ordered to be released -- by a federal judge -- today.

July 22, 2005, New York, NY—The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) today denounced the latest efforts of the Bush Administration to block the release of the Darby photos and videos depicting torture at Iraq’s Abu Ghraib. (...)
In June, the government ... received an extension from the judge stating that they needed time in order to redact the photographs and videos. They were given until today at the eleventh hour filed a motion ... based on an entirely new argument a 7(F) exemption from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act to withhold law enforcement-related information in order to protect the physical safety of individuals. (HUH?)


“This is absolutely unacceptable,” stated Michael Ratner, President of CCR. “We cannot move forward from this scandal until we have a full public accounting and independent investigation into what happened at Abu Ghraib. The government cannot continue to hide evidence of torture.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, if they're going to be indicted for treason,
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 03:00 PM by Goldmund
what's a few contempt of court charges more or less?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. To protect the physical safety of individuals...
that they tortured mercilessly??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. No, I expect they'll say that they're trying to protect the soldiers...
... in Iraq and Afghanistan, and civilians in those countries, as well, citing the riots (supposedly) related to the Newsweek "Koran desecration" snippet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here is 7(f)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh yes they can, and have been for Five Years now.
All in the name of National Security. :hide:

Lets see LMSM cover this one!:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Check12 Donating Member (445 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. We need to make sure MSM boneheads get this out
Here is Gator's diary at dKos, there is a medio blaster coment there.

http://info.dailykos.com/story/2005/7/22/145929/449

What are the consequences of this for the government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, of course!
"To protect the physical safety of individuals." Namely, to protect their own butts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Hm, they must be claiming something under this:
"Now, in the current post-September 11, 2001 homeland security environment, Exemption 7(F) provides vital new avenues of protection for sensitive information that could prove deadly if obtained by those seeking to do harm to the public on a large scale"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bad timing
So they will use legal trickery to keep them from public view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Contempt of court?
I suspect this will start a new scandal in and of itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Protecting "individuals" or themselves and their policies?
Understandable that these pictures could stir up more anger and that our troops could face its consequences. But what is corrupt is that the people responsible for creating this situation are not being held accountable. We really need more transparency and accountability in our government. They're hiding behind the skirts of the WOT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wow. The photos and videos must be truly horrifying.
And when they finally do come out, everyone is going to understand why the WH went to such incredible lengths to keep the public from seeing them.

They may be able to delay the inevitable, but these photos will come out. The closer to the 2006 congressional elections, the better, I say.

Bushco may have just installed the House Democratic majority that ensures their impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Wonder why they haven't been "leaked" yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well, geee wiz. Color me shocked.
This administration tries to block information from becoming public? That's a first. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paula777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. Doesn't say how long it will be extended. Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. They out a CIA agent...
Act to withhold law enforcement-related information in order to protect the physical safety of individuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. Someone's gotta leak them.
I think we will seem them---sooner rather than later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. Saturday Night Massacre! Fire Archibald Cox!!!
I Am enraged...AGAIN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. And now it's time for an "I told you so" moment, by bluestateguy
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 03:19 PM by bluestateguy
Just a good ole' boys
Never meaning no harm

cut

They're just a good ole' boys
Wouldn't change if they could


Powerful white men protect and take care of other powerful white men in positions of power.

Those of you who actually thought those pictures would be released today are exposed for the naive fools that you are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. I did think the ACLU had it locked up
but this shows that I wasn't paying near enough attention.

I've been busy with memos and leaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. Shockingly unbelievable but totally anticipated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
19. Doesn't Seymour Hersch have some of the photos?
Can he legally release them? If not, could he leak them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm sorry, maybe I'm feeling rather cynical now, but this is hilarious
I am just not suprised at all.

Did anyone actually believe that we would be seeing these photos anytime soon?

Did anyone expect some degree of transparency or honesty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I am surprised that they still exist.
I thought that a statement would come out that these photos and videos accidently got burned or shredded. What could anyone do about that if they had?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Or that they never existed in the first place
That is, a statement from the administration that the photos never existed, and were an invention of liberals and the media trying to slander Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. No
I thought the ACLU had forced their hand - had it locked up legally. But as I said in another post, I wasn't paying near enough attention to this one.

You know how when someone close to you dies, you have moments, fleeting moments when you forget that they are dead until it slams you upside the head again and the grief once again becomes shrill? This is how I feel about America and her slide into fascism. I was relying on a concept of rule of law that doesn't exist anymore. I momentarily forgot about the death of America that I've had a ringside seat to for the last few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Nicely put -- about the death of America.
I feel the same way. This is not the country I grew up in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JRob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. of course they are...
They're pulling so much shit, on so many levels that it makes my mind numb...

We're being smothered by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrdmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
28. The ACLU put a story up on their Web Site
It does not state what their plans are to contend the governments position.

link
http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=18811&c=206
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC