Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Waxman: 11 Security Breaches in Plame Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 07:53 PM
Original message
Waxman: 11 Security Breaches in Plame Case
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 07:56 PM by Hissyspit
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/072205Q.shtml

Waxman: 11 Security Breaches in Plame Case
By Rep. Henry Waxman
YubaNet
Friday 22 July 2005

The disclosure of the covert identity of Valerie Plame Wilson in a July 14, 2003, column by Robert Novak has triggered a criminal investigation and led to calls for congressional investigations. The Novak column, however, appears to be only one of multiple leaks of Ms. Wilson's identity. A new fact sheet released today by Rep. Waxman documents that there appear to be at least 11 separate instances in which Administration officials disclosed information about Ms. Wilson's identity and association with the CIA.

New Fact Sheet Details Multiple Administration Security Breaches Involving Valerie Plame Wilson

On July 14, 2003, columnist Robert Novak revealed that the wife of Ambassador Joseph Wilson, Valerie Plame Wilson, was a covert CIA agent. This disclosure of classified information has triggered a criminal investigation by a Special Counsel and led to calls for congressional investigations.

The Novak column, however, appears to be only one of multiple leaks of Ms. Wilson's identity. As this fact sheet documents, there appear to be at least 11 separate instances in which Administration officials disclosed information about Ms. Wilson's identity and association with the CIA.

- snip -

The Disclosures of Valerie Wilson's Identity

1. The Disclosure by Karl Rove to Columnist Robert Novak

ENTIRE LIST AT LINK

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberaliraqvet26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Waxman made me proud today...
everyone should watch this hearing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He makes Americans proud.
At least the ones with any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Henry Waxman has been a steadfast Democrat for a long time
we are blessed to have men of his character in our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick for Rep Waxman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starfury Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recommended and kicked! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Damn, they actually did a good job, was this all from the
inquiry today? (or was that yesterday already?) Didn't know they covered Gannon too... I'm smiling...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Here's Waxman's original posting at 2:45 p.m. today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Eleven , eh?.....They really wanted the Public to know about it!!!
TREASON!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Seems to me these guys testifying are really, really pissed.
Good for them for speaking out. Their lives are probably in danger now more than any other time in the careers. Rep. Waxman is doing a really good job as always. Go, Guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Does anybody else find it odd that these Reps are saying they
never saw the letter the CIA guys sent to the White House? How come I've read it and they haven't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Waxman is a hero eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Check out #10 - JimmyJeff Gannon is back in the spotlight! Recommended.

10. The Disclosure by an Unidentified Source to James Guckert of Talon News
On October 28, 2003, Talon News posted on its website an interview with Ambassador Joseph Wilson in which the questioner asked: "An internal government memo prepared by U.S. intelligence personnel details a meeting in early 2002 where your wife, a member of the agency or clandestine service working on Iraqi weapons issues, suggested that you could be sent to investigate the reports. Do you dispute that?" <29> Talon News is tied to a group called GOP USA <30> and is operated by Texas Republican Robert Eberle. <31> Its only reporter, James Guckert (also known as Jeff Gannon), resigned when it was revealed that he gained access to the White House using a false name after his press credentials were rejected by House and Senate press galleries. <32> In a March 2004 interview with his own news service, Mr. Guckert stated that the classified document was "easily accessible." <33> In a February 11, 2005, interview with Wolf Blitzer of CNN, Mr. Guckert said the FBI interviewed him about "how I knew or received a copy of a confidential CIA memo," but he refused to answer FBI questions because of his status as a "journalist." <34> A week later, Mr. Guckert changed his account, claiming he "was given no special information by the White House or by anybody else." <35>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yeah, I should have highlighted that in the original post...
I think I will post it separately if you have not already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Be my guest - I do recommend putting in a link in this thread so we can
find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Here it is, Nothing Without Hope:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thanks - I'd like to see the whole "Gannon" scandal brought out again
and THIS time followed to the truth instead of being suppressed by the Poodle Press at the behest of the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. I love the way Waxman lays out facts.
Simple, straight and to the point.

The man rocks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. Multipled by every operative that was exposed.
"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. Rove, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. Libby, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. Cheney, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Ms. Rice you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. Fleischer, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. Hadley, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. Powell, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. Rumsfeld, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Ms. Hughes, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Ms. Matalin, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. Calio, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. Wilkinson, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. Bolton, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. Armitage, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. Card, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. McClellan, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"

"Will the Defendant please rise. Mr. W, you are charged with 2012 counts of treason. 204 counts of obstruction and 51 counts of conspiracy. How plead you?"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. The fact they made such efforts
to get it out to as many sources by multiple people has conspiracy written all over it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. That's what's so incredible
Either they didn't think about the ramifications, or they dismissed them because they've gotten away with so much more.

I believe it's the latter. They never factored in Ambassador Wilson's tenacity for fighting for what is right. They also never factored in the power of the CIA's sense of outrage.

It's one thing to classify people like us as what Bush* has referred to as a 'special interest group', but another when his White House endangers a system who's sole reason is to keep us as a whole from being endangered.

It's frightening to think of other conspiracies they have out there. I can think of many questionable activities from this band of thugs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peggy Day Donating Member (859 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
19. Why does Novak get off without trouble?
He is the one that chose to print this info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. Waxman has always been
a "Good Guy"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. Henry Waxman is great!
I watched him yesterday on CSPAN with the ex-CIA guys. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
23. Conspiracy to commit espionage
:spank: -Conspiracy to grant aid and comfort to the enemy

:spank: -Granting aid and comfort to the enemy

:spank: -Conspiracy to illegally disclose classified information to unauthorized persons

:spank: -Illegal disclosure of classified information to unauthorized persons

:spank: -Conspiracy to illegally disseminate classified documents to unauthorized persons

:spank: -Illegal dissemination of classified documents to unauthorized persons

:spank: -Conspiracy to obstruct justice

:spank: -Obstruction of justice

:spank: -Conspiracy to commit Treason

:spank: -Treason

:grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr: :grr:

What else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
24. KICK!
I like the way Waxman documents!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC