Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Online data gets personal: Cell phone records for sale

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 08:57 AM
Original message
Online data gets personal: Cell phone records for sale
*I am just subscribed to this newsletter - I don't write it *

Privacy World - The WORLD'S SHREWDEST PRIVACY NEWSLETTER

Online data gets personal: Cell phone records for sale

WASHINGTON -- They're not just after your credit card or Social
Security numbers. Fueled by the ease of online commerce, snoops are
on the trail of other personal information, too. One of the hottest
markets: records of phone calls, especially from cell phones.

A tool long used by law enforcement and private investigators to
help locate criminals or debt-skippers, phone records are a part of
the sea of personal data routinely bought and sold online in an
Internet-driven, I-can-find-out-anything-about-you world. Legal
experts say many of the methods for acquiring such information are
illegal, but they receive scant attention from authorities.

Think your mate is cheating? For $110, Locatecell.com will provide
you with the outgoing calls from his or her cell phone for the last
billing cycle, up to 100 calls. All you need to supply is the name,
address and the number for the phone you want to trace. Order
online, and get results within hours.

Carlos Anderson, a licensed private investigator in Florida, offers
a similar service for $165, for all major telephone carriers.

"This report provides all the calls with dates, times, and duration
on the billing statement," according to Anderson's Web site, which
adds, "Incoming Calls and Call Location are provided if available."

Learning who someone talked to on the phone cannot enable the kind
of financial fraud made easier when a Social Security or credit card
number is purloined. Instead, privacy advocates say, the intrusion
is more personal.

"This is a person's associations," said Daniel Solove, a George
Washington University Law School professor who specializes in
privacy issues. "Who their physicians are, are they seeing a
psychiatrist, companies they do business with ... it's a real
wealth of data to find out the people that a person interacts with."

Such records could be used by criminals, such as stalkers or abusive
spouses trying to find victims.

Unlike Social Security numbers, which are on many public documents
that have been scooped up for years by data brokers, the only
repository of telephone call records is the phone companies.

Wireless carriers say they are aware that unauthorized people seek
to get their customers' call records and sell them, but the
companies say they take steps to prevent it.

"There are probably 100 such sites" known to security officials at
Verizon Wireless that offer to sell phone records, said Jeffrey
Nelson, a company spokesman, who said Verizon is always trying to
respond to abusive practices. He said that the company views all
such activity as illegal and that "we have historically, and will
continue to, change policies to reflect the changing nature of
criminal activity," though he declined to be specific.

Mark Siegel, a spokesman for Cingular Wireless, said his company
constantly is on guard against people trying to get at customer
information. But he called the acquisition of call records "an
infinitesimally small problem" at his firm.

Some experts in the field aren't so sure.

"Information security by carriers to protect customer records is
practically nonexistent and is routinely defeated," said Robert
Douglas, a former private investigator and now a privacy consultant
who has tracked the issue for several years.

Experts say data brokers and private investigators who offer cell
phone records for sale probably get them using one of three
techniques.

They might have someone on the inside at the carrier who sells the
data. Spokesmen for the telephone companies said strict rules
prohibiting such activity make this unlikely. But Joel Winston,
associate director of the Federal Trade Commission's Financial
Practices Division, said other types of data-theft investigations
have shown that "finding someone on the inside to bribe is not that
difficult."

Another method is "pretexting," in which the data broker or
investigator pretends to be the cell phone account holder and
persuades the carrier's employees to release the information. The
availability of Social Security numbers makes it easier to convince
a customer service agent that the caller is the account holder.

Finally, someone seeking call data can try to get access to consumer
accounts online.

Telephone companies, like other service firms, are encouraging their
customers to manage their accounts over the Internet. Typically,
the online capability is set up in advance, waiting to be activated
by the customer. But many customers never do.

If the person seeking the records can figure out how to activate
online account management in the name of a real customer before that
customer does, the call records are there for the taking.

Federal law expressly prohibits pretexting for financial data --
which at one time was a primary means of stealing credit card and
other account information -- but does not cover telephone records,
which are covered by a patchwork of state and federal laws governing
access to personal information.

Some privacy advocates argue that the federal pretexting law needs
to be broadened.

At the very least, "there need to be audit trails to detect employee
access to this personal information and a data retention schedule
that mandates deletion of records" after a certain period of time,
said Chris Jay Hoofnagle, West Coast director of the Electronic
Privacy Information Center.

The center filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
last week against one data broker, Intelligent e-Commerce Inc. of
Encinitas, Calif., saying it misrepresented its right to obtain the
information. The firm, which operates the Web site
BestPeopleSearch.com, advertises a variety of personal data for
sale, including cell phone records.

The company, which says on its Web site that it uses a licensed
private investigator to get the information, said through its lawyer
that it seeks to comply with all local, state and federal laws.
Attorney Larry Slade said he does not know how the company acquires
the phone records.

Phone companies view all these tactics as illegal, even if they are
used to help track down criminal activity. Instead, carriers say,
they require court orders before releasing customer records.

The FTC views pretexting as a deceptive practice even without a
specific ban on its use for telephone records, Winston said.

But he said the agency has never taken such a case to court and does
not know how widespread the problem is. He said the FTC must focus
its resources on the practices of data thieves that can cause the
most damage to large numbers of consumers, such as financial fraud.

Many of the vendors of call records are unregulated data brokers,
such as Data Find Solutions Inc. of Knoxville, Tenn., which
operates Locatecell.com. Company officials did not return calls
seeking comment.

At the Florida office of private investigator Anderson, a man who
answered the phone and identified himself only as Mike said, "I
don't really think we're going to reveal our sources" of phone
records. "There's a lot of ways of doing it."

At Reliatrace Locate Services of Wisconsin, a man who declined to
give his name said only that his firm buys the data from another
firm.

The above article appeared recently in the The Washington Post.

Until next issue stay cool and remain low profile!

Privacy World

PS If you'd like to avoid being snooped on and have your privacy sold
down the drain, get Privacy World's "Freedom Phone" with a Hong Kong
sim chip (mobile number.)

PW guarantees there's no clipper chip inside our tri-band mobiles,
and the sim chip and all calls are totally untraceable.

Euro 100 discount off our web site price for subscribers only if orders
are received and paid by August 30th, 2005.

Full details at http://www.privacyworld.com/freedommobile.html

To order proceed to https://www.privacyworld.com/order_bwe.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe, send a blank message to PrivacyWorld-on@mail-list.com
To unsubscribe, send a blank message to PrivacyWorld-off@mail-list.com



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ariana Celeste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. I guess that's one more reason
NOT to buy a cell phone.

"Some privacy advocates argue that the federal pretexting law needs
to be broadened.

At the very least, "there need to be audit trails to detect employee
access to this personal information and a data retention schedule
that mandates deletion of records" after a certain period of time,
said Chris Jay Hoofnagle, West Coast director of the Electronic
Privacy Information Center."

I think they should be doing more than just that... If this is really happening, I can't see any reason not to make it illegal. It is used to track criminals, why not, I don't know- require proof the person looking for info is an officer or fed? Would that really be all that difficult?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree
I can't believe how lax these people are... I mean, what if it were their husband, wife, daughter, or son being "traced" but who knows???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ariana Celeste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't know. I can't believe it either.
As for politicians, maybe they want to see it become a bigger problem first, or whatever. It is a big problem if it's happening AT ALL, but I have trouble believing very many of them care much about privacy issues anymore- shit if they did, they wouldn't have renewed the Patriot Act.
As for the people selling this info, it disgusts me they can't see passed the dollar signs. I could never in good conscience sell info like that- because as you said, I'd be thinking about my husband, mother, brother, etc. Its a shame more people don't think about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. helderheid
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source.


Thank you.


DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. sorry
my bad - I just posted from what they emailed - next time I won't be so lazy and will go to their website and see if it's posted there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thanks. This has to be brought to the attention of the lawmakers, before
if it is not already out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC