Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:21 PM
Original message |
So what do ya'll think of the Pentagon wanting to raise recruit age to 42 |
acmavm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
1. A lot more of those pathetic creatures at the who's name will not be |
|
mentioned are now eligible to enlist.
That's definitely a plus.
|
Mayberry Machiavelli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'm sure it'll make a lot of eager shrubco supporters sign up who haven't |
|
been able to, up 'till now. :eyes:
|
mike_c
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
3. one more drawback to being 50.... |
|
I can't sign up to kill brown people in eye-rack for Bush and big-oil....
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. "Shrink, I want to kill... |
|
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 05:45 PM by TahitiNut
"Shrink, I want to kill. I mean, I wanna, I wanna kill. Kill. I wanna, I wanna see, I wanna see blood and gore and guts and veins in my teeth. Eat dead burnt bodies. I mean kill, Kill, KILL, KILL."
And I started jumpin up and down yelling, "KILL, KILL," and he started jumpin up and down with me and we was both jumping up and down yelling, "KILL, KILL."
And the sergeant came over, pinned a medal on me, sent me down the hall, said, "You're our boy."
|
Journeyman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
21. Give it another 18 months, mike. . . |
|
they'll change the age again and we'll both be eligible to die for ShrubCo. Somehow, I feel this may be the ultimate plan for "saving" SS.
|
Lord_StarFyre
(592 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:24 PM
Response to Original message |
|
1) Dumbya and Oil Dick have more Wars planned
2) The Draft is Coming
3) Once they get rid of that age bracket, who'll be left to challenge their policies, kids and old people...
|
neweurope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
"Once they get rid of that age bracket, who'll be left to challenge their policies, kids and old people..."
Also - it means that when (not if) the draft comes they'll be able to draft anybody up to that age. Hallelujah!
--------------
Remember Fallujah
Bush to The Hague!
|
newswolf56
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
5. More likely another forewarning of the coming economic collapse -- |
|
the BushCabal's version of a "jobs program" that solves three "poverty problems" at once: puts the poor under military discipline, gets us off the streets, and eliminates us via the wartime casualty lists. A "final solution" as conceived by "Compassionate Conservatism," but ultimately just as deadly as the Nazi original.
|
Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:34 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Presently there are over 1700+ reservists who are 50+ years of age |
sam sarrha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message |
7. could explane why they are exporting jobs and importing Mexicans to |
|
replace them when they are drafted or have to join to feed their families..
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Just anonther junta stab at fudging the unemployment #s |
|
Really, no draft coming. Really.
|
babsbunny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
10. This would give my Son a chance to put his money where his mouth is! |
|
All Repubs who are backing this war, and are 42 years or under should go!!!! Please!!!
|
DanCa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message |
11. That the young republicans who wanted this damn war are cowards |
|
So there going to try and reinitiate some kind of back door draft.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
13. It is getting drafty in here |
NNN0LHI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Raise it to 62. Sign em up for SS and pipeline guard duty the same time nt |
BuelahWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message |
15. I'm glad I now have a job |
|
and will be 43 in November! :scared:
|
driver8
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-05 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
26. I'll be 43 in November, also -- November 19th. |
|
I am a veteran, though...and there is no fucking way I am signing anything until my 43rd birthday.
|
lapfog_1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Maybe it means something like this |
|
Ah, quickly we move through the ruins that bow to the ground The old men and children they send out to face us, they can't slow us down And all that I ever was able to see The eyes of the city are opening now it's the end of the dream
|
newswolf56
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
25. Especially if sung in... |
Stirk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |
17. It means they really need people with certain skills, like medicine, |
|
IT, etc.
Personally, I think there's a Draft coming as well.
|
HysteryDiagnosis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 06:00 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Not a good way to fix social security... not at all. |
Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. Yu are absolutely correct -- they do need doctors bigtime!! |
rasputin1952
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message |
20. I guess all of those gung ho young R's decided they didn't want to |
|
fight for the war they clamored for and support so vocally.
They have "other priorities", and why sacrifice oneself to a few years of some pretty damn good training and experiences, (and some bad ones too), if they can get out of college and make money as war profiteers?
|
Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. Yeah, well roumour has it the the Draft word will be mentioned in 06 |
Straight Shooter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 06:30 PM
Response to Original message |
23. Unfortunately, Ann Coulter dodged the age bullet by a squeaker |
|
Born 12/8/61. If only they would raise the recruitment age to 44.
|
Bellamia
(671 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-24-05 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
24. Recruitment age 44???? |
|
You wouldn't say that if you had a 42 year old son.
Why not lower the age to 16, then my grandson could move to Canada sooner than we thought!!!;>)
Sorry, being sarcastic, the whole idea of a draft justs upsets me no end.
|
driver8
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-25-05 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
27. She may not be able to enlist, but I'm sure there are "other things" |
|
she could do to help the troops...
I can't believe I just wrote that. I am going to go and wash my hands and my mouth out with soap.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:32 PM
Response to Original message |