Go vote.....Are you willing to be seached?

[Roxy66]

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3080261/

Just curious....

[The Sushi Bandit]

1. People are fucking parinoid!

Safety vs Privacy: Would you be willing to be searched?

responses


Yes
67%

No
33%

[Roxy66]

2. I know...those results are really scary to me

[queeg]

3. As long as I don't have to get the purple finger

[FreedomAngel82]

5. I don't like this at all

Safety vs Privacy: Would you be willing to be searched? * 14036 responses
Yes
67% No
33%
Thank you for voting. Click to send us an e-mail to share your thoughts. Plus, see past voting results. at 3:37am est

[DemBones DemBones]

4. Lousy poll, as usual for MSNBC. They don't specify what

they mean by "be searched." Having your bag searched is much less troubling than having your bra searched as some airport scanners are doing now. I had my purse searched once going into a Johnny Winter concert! Rough crowd there.

[JDPriestly]

6. I look and am sweet and old. I do not want some one wasting

their time looking through my bags. That would be just ridiculous. It is highly unlikely that I would suddenly do something violent at my age. Frankly, I wouldn't know how. They should be watching for criminals, not for little old ladies.

[rodeodance]

7. Yes 67% No 33%

Safety vs Privacy: Would you be willing to be searched? * 14098 responses
Yes 67% No 33%
Thank you for voting. Click to send us an e-mail to share your thoughts. Plus, see past voting results.

[acmavm]

8. 5:26 a.m. CST - Don't the numbers ever change?

Safety vs Privacy: Would you be willing to be searched? * 14173 responses


Yes
67% No
33%
)))))))))))))))))))))))))))

I've noticed on these MSNBC polls that sometimes, quite often in fact, no matter how many people vote, the numbers stay exactly the same. How can that be.