Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Torture photos---can someone explain the reason why they were taken?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:12 AM
Original message
Torture photos---can someone explain the reason why they were taken?
I mean, I accept that the "reason" for why human beings committed the very acts themselves can't be put into words...but why on earth are these "soldiers" and "commanders" documenting those acts (against children!!!)???

To show their superiors that orders are being followed? For whose eyes were these photos intended?

What was the original original purpose for taking these pictures?

Sorry if this seems like a dumb question, but I really don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. I can't possibly imagine why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. humiliation, intimidation, subjugation, and above all, fun.
some iraqi men and women after having been raped and humiliated beg for their relatives to come and kill them. some of the photos have been circulated locally to instill humiliation and terror to all the iraqis and all muslims.

there are perhaps millions of such photos floating out there in cyberspace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. And then the Bushites say the reason why the photos can't be released...
...is because the sight of them would inflame the Muslim world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. When they went after Newsweek
for running the story on flushing the Koran. Scott McClellan, you have created terrible damage to the United States image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Souvenirs of ...
... *'s war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think some of them
were misguided and really thought they were doing something heroic and wanted to preserve their actions on film. Some were twisted and sadistic. So they took pictures just like serial killers take souvenirs from their victims. And for others, I am hoping they knew it was wrong and decided to make it a Kodak moment.

I think back to attrocities in Vietnam committed by our soldiers and how we found out about them - eye witnesses reported them. Eye witnesses who were soldiers, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Trophies.
These are the sort of soldiers who would've collected ears in Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. Leverage on a couple of fronts
Against the victims. These are crimes against Islam*, and many Muslims would never speak of these things. Use it to keep them quiet (This might also happen to someone else you know)

Against the servicemen and women. Just ask Lyddie England or Charles Ganer. Do this, that's an order, now here hold the bag for us, cuz hey, we got your face on film doing it.

Against the other inmates. Just having to watch this, or be shown the pictures, would get them saying ANYthing so that it would either stop, or in hopes it wouldn't be them next.


*Also crimes against humanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Wow...
...it's amazing that they thought those things were worth the risk of easy and vivid exposure of their crimes that the existence of photos always makes possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. When you believe you are above the law
Anything is possible. The people in charge at Abu Graibh survived the first round of photos, aside from Karpinski.

Besides who's to say they were thinking in the first place? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's just a damn shame that the military has programmed
these soldiers so well. Maybe one day, after they've been back in the real world, these atrocities will hit them like a ton of bricks and they will never be able to forgive themselves for listening to the lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unrepuke Donating Member (763 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Then they'l be on the roof with a deer rifle, or crashing a Jeep into
a V.A. hospital
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. Alledgedly they were taken to be shown as a threat to other detainees.
they were menat to be coersive in nature. Used to show new detainees what could happen to them if they did not cooperate.

But, they also say this is not a pattern, nor was it systematic.

One or the other MUST be a lie as they are mutually exclusive explanations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. Blackmail & souvenirs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. I hadn't thought of the blackmail angle until you and others...
...in this thread mentioned it.

As far as souvenirs go, it seems amazing that the guards (the "muscle" behind the operation) would be allowed to bring their own cameras into the facility. You would think that the higher up "brains" would have kept a much tighter control so that only "official" cameras would have been there.

How can they expect to keep things secret and get a hold of all the "souvenirs" after the fact?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrfrapp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. Possible Reasons
According to this article, "the photos were among thousands turned over by the key “whistleblower” in the scandal, Specialist Joseph M. Darby." My interpretation of that is that they were taken with the express purpose of blowing the whistle.

That article refers to the unreleased photos however. The photos already in the public domain look to me like souvenirs, as others have already suggested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. They're proud of what they did
And want souvenirs to show their decendents 30 years from now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. The Army is a bureaucracy. They document everything.
It's not a complicated problem. The dehumanizing of detainees, whether they're guilty of terrorism or not, is part of the bureaucratic system that treats everything and everyone like a datapoint to be indexed. The problem is that the treatment of detainees has been so bad that we can't bring to trial even those detainees who might be guilty of actual terrorism acts. Bush and Gonzales's fuck up here has reduced us down to three untenable options.

1- eventually release the prisoners, adding fuel to the propaganda fires of al-Qaeda as first hand accounts of the treatment there comes out--along with adding any potential terrorists among the detainees to the ranks of terror groups.

2- keep the detainees at Guantanamo indefinitely, as in for the rest of their lives.

I won't discuss the 3rd option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
19. Because they are sadistic, twisted motherfuckers
And want to replay their crimes for 'fun'. I'm sure there is also a twisted sexual component to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. War Trophies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
21. for training purposes.
Now that the 4th amendment is but a quaint memory, at least in New York City, how long before the rest of the constitution is trashed beyond recognition.

These photos will help HSA and TSA goons learn how to do it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC