Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A fairly dim question (regards CIA)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:21 PM
Original message
A fairly dim question (regards CIA)
Where does the head of covert operations work? I am presuming the person in charge of covert operations is himself a covert agent. I also am assuming that he works at Langley. My question becomes, assuming both of the above are true, how on earth could the Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee not know that at least some employees at Langley are indeed, covert? Am I wrong in assuming the head of covert operations works at Langley?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. The person in charge isn't covert
The Director, CIA is obviously not covert. You don't need to be covert to supervise covert operations.

But your final assumption is true - you'd have to be a complete imbecile to not know that a CIA agent, no matter where they work, is possibly covert.

(I've rephrased that a bit for you, but I think the word imbecile strikes to the heart of what you're saying.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evermind Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think you're right about Langley, wrong that the person in charge of
covert ops must themselves be covert.

Until recently, James Pavitt had that job, according to cnn, at: http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/04/tenet.resigns/ which publishes his picture, even!

Presumably, the covertness emerges somewhere lower down the chain of command.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. So the guy who knows who all the covert agents are is himself not
covert. Wow, who would have thunk it? I knew the CIA director wasn't covert but figured the man right below him would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evermind Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well, until recently, the DCI (Director of Central Intelligence) was
tasked with co-ordinating ALL intelligence from the (about 19?) various US intelligence agencies, including boiling it down for daily reports of the essentials to the President.

When I last read up on it, the department in the CIA specifically dealing with covert ops was the Directorate of Operations (whose head would be about 2 or 3 steps down from the DCI).

Within that, you'd have "case officers", who would report up the chain on intelligence and ops with their "assets" - truly secret operatives "run" by the case officers (the names of assets would be extremely sensitive information, probably known only to the case officer and on request by his superiors, and hidden behind codenames, usually).

Case officers would work both out of Langley, and at various other locations around the world (under cover at embassies or front companies, etc.)

I'm not absolutely sure how "covert" case officers would be - but I think at least some of them would be under strict cover, and have their names protected long after they'd "left the field". I think in at least some cases, and possibly most of the time, the case officers themselves would have their names protected in internal reports, etc., by the use of codenames.

Don't take this as gospel, but I think it's roughly correct..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. nah, he works in a dark alley in Berlin wearing a trench coat and shades
Gee, you lieberal scum are so STUPIF. Moran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. A point that Larry Johnson, former CIA, made in his blog:
I guess Senator Pat Roberts believes that if he repeats a lie long enough it eventually becomes true. While it is one thing for a political bag carrier like Ken Mehlman to be woefully ignorant about CIA practices and procedures, it is downright alarming that Senator Roberts can be so misinformed. Today, while appearing on CNN's Late Edition, Roberts repeated the specious claim that Valerie Plame could not be undercover because she went to work everyday at CIA Headquarters.

Folks, there is no excuse for this level of incompetence. There are thousands of undercover CIA employees who drive through the three gates at CIA Headquarters in McLean, Virginia everyday. And this Senator from Kansas who chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee has the audacity to blame CIA for intelligence failures? How can he recognize failures when he does not even understand the very simple basics about people who work undercover at CIA? He should spend more time reading up on the CIA and less time memorizing Ken Mehlman talking points. Gee Toto, we're not in Kansas anymore.
http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2005/07/incompetence_on.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Alec Station, the anti-UBL unit, was set up in Tysons Corner, VA
That's down the road from Langley. Some other operations have been moved there. Traffic is hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC