Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yar har on Democratic Unity - woohoo!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-25-05 11:43 PM
Original message
Yar har on Democratic Unity - woohoo!
:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:

UNITED WE STAND - DIVIDED WE FALL!

:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Simple Concept
I think you have something there.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Boring. Did that, been there and look how far in the hole it has got us
Pushing a DLC agenda is a proven surefire way to lose an election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The DLC? Say, wha'?
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 12:14 AM by Writer
This is about the DLC?

Okay... so be it. When we join together to fight the GOP - regardless of the agenday - you'll have to be the odd man out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5.  Yeah right. As if this whole catapulting the unity propaganda program
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 12:27 AM by Robbien
has not originated in the DLC's conference in Ohio. As if anyone believes that.

We all joined together in 2004 under the DLC and lost. Now you are pushing for everyone to do it again.

What was that definition of stupidity again? Something about doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. no that was the definition of insanity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well, Divide and Conquer works great for the Republicans!
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 12:16 AM by emulatorloo
Cuz it keeps them in power

(who cares bout the DLC? not me!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick
with an additional yar har! :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. Unity? Great! Let's go.
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 01:47 AM by longship
Fine with you? That's good.

What's that? You say you're not for withdrawing from Iraq?
Sorry, we're not united on that.

What's that? You want to restrict women's access to reproductive health care?
Sorry, we're not united on that.

What's that? You think business can only be strong by lifting government regulations?
Sorry, we're not united on that.

What's that? You think free trade is the answer to the country's business woes?
Sorry, we're not united on that.

What's that? You think the private sector has had the best solution for providing health care for everybody?
Sorry, we're not united on that.

What's that? You voted for the Patriot Act?
Sorry, we're not united on that.

What's that? You say you voted for the Bankrupcy Bill?
Sorry, we're not united on that.

Now, do you see the problem? We disagree on some very substantive issues.

What's that? You say that you represent the mainstream Democratic Party?
Well, I disagree with that, too.

If you manage to nominate another presidential candidate in 2008, I will hold my nose and support him or her. But I feel very strongly that such a candidate will lose yet again. If you want to regain power, an opposition party has to demonstrate a difference. Otherwise you do not give the voters a reason to choose your candidate over the incumbent. In such races, the incumbent almost always wins. That's Politics 101 stuff.

So now you understand the problem. This is why many of us cannot support the Democratic Leadership Council. The problem is that you don't lead, you follow. And that will never be a winning formula.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. somehow I missed your point
is this about the DLC or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlakeB Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not sure if this is about the DLC or not but...
fact is, we do need to unite- whether we are DLCers or DNCers. We are all Democrats, and as such I think we need to find common ground and use that ground to stand on while fighting the radical right. The Republicans have managed to do it with a party that encompasses religious fundies, corporate interest whores, pseudo-libertarians, and Republican moderates. I think our two factions are more focused and easier to unite. If the Republicans can bring together money hungry corporate interest whores and religious fundies, two completely different groups, I think we can bring together liberal Democrats and moderate Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The RNC had it easy
The religious wingnuts are not anti-corporatists. And many corporatists are religious wingnuts, take Frist and Delay for example.

The DLC are corporatists and anti-Progressive. Progressives are anti-corporatists and anti-DLC. There is no crossover and no middle ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlakeB Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. The DLC is not anti-progressive.
They support corporations a bit too much for my tastes, but they are not the bad guys here. They believe in progressive values for the most part, and while their economic policies aren't to my liking, they are 100 times more progressive in that area than the Bush administration.

I'm telling you right now I'm a crossover, and there has to be others like me. And there should be more. It's ridiculous to have all this aggression towards the DLC, and vice versa for the DLC having aggression towards the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. They also support RNC foreign policies
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 02:42 AM by Robbien
They support the continued occupation of Iraq and carefully do not mention all the bases we are building there.

They support NED and their covert activities to keep South and Central America in unstable conditions in order for corporatists to keep control of S & CA assets.

They support keeping Cubans in a poverty state by supporting the embargo.

They do not push for African relief

They support the Byrd Amendment which takes unfair advantage of Canadian and EU trade.

and so on.

And on many domestic issues they vote with consistently with the RNC. Take the bankruptcy act and confirmation of Gonzales for example.

edit: The environmental issues. . . not even on their radar.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I will never unite
with DLCers or anyone else who aids and abets the criminal regime in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. If you're talking about the DLC, they can join the *left* or
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 02:37 AM by Stirk
fuck off for all I care. We don't need unity if it means letting a bunch of Republican-lites give us a corporate-friendly message.

We did the DLC thing in 2004. The election should've been impossible to lose, but they managged to lose it. It's time for some populism, not more stealth corporatist bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kick again...
Because I'd like to emphasize this point! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Go call NewDem Melissa Bean and tell her to unite with the party
and vote against CAFTA. She is planning to vote with the RNC on this issue even after Pelosi and Labor said they don't support that action.

She would welcome hearing from you and your wish for a unity program

1-877-SOB-U-SOB

1-866-340-9281

1-800-718-1008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. The DLC still sucks, what's new?
That y'all can't more rich white racists to vote for DINOS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC