dhinojosa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 09:51 AM
Original message |
Poll question: Was the footage of the Shuttle jettison off the booster cool or what? |
|
Holy crap! Was the footage of the Shuttle jettison off the booster f****ing cool or what?
|
SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Cool, but I couldn't get the image of wasted tax dollars out of my head |
MindPilot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. wasted? no freaking way |
|
In civilized circles we call this "progress"
|
MindPilot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. If you needed another reason to buy that big screen HDTV |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 09:58 AM by MindPilot
this was it!!
My ass is still kicked but I really wish the commentators would just let us hear the radio chatter.
Oops this was supposed to be a response to the OP
|
gristy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
I was watching ABC and had to mute the idiots.
|
Ready4Change
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
dhinojosa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
26. You know you are right....it didn't have any of the regular idiots... |
|
this guy seemed to have done his research before talking with the nasa rep.
|
Ready4Change
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 12:24 PM by Ready4Change
But CNN's "space guy" has been consistently good. Seems pretty good on both knowlege and converting it to common lingo, and seems to have enthusiam for the subject matter.
|
RebelOne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. I have always been 100% behind space exploration |
|
I would rather have my tax dollars wasted on space travel than on unnecessary wars.
|
SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
16. Perhaps I should have been more specific... |
|
I am 100%, absolutely for space travel. Indeed, I think NASA should get a FAR larger budget han it has. Just look at the everyday products that have come to us initially through NASA R&D. What I meant by my post is that the space shuttle is 25 years old, extremely outdated, and far too expensive, given the results it offers. If NASA spent its money developing a shuttle that isn't reliant on solid-rocket fuel, in the meantime launching unmanned missions such as the Mars Rovers, we would be learning a lot more, and doing it for less money. Everyone benefits.
|
Johonny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
What's wrong with solid rocket fuel?
|
Hong Kong Cavalier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
28. You can't shut it off. |
|
Once a solid rocket is burning, it's on until the fuel is spent. I believe you can get more punch per pound, as it were, but you have little control over the amount of thrust when you're using it.
I'm no rocket scientist, though. All this I remembered from high school when we were watching the first shuttle launch after the Challenger disaster.
|
janx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
21. Except for the time (2001?) when the Mars probes crashed... |
|
Not everything will be successful. This mission is important for morale. It's a good one.
|
SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
24. Yes, the Mars probe crashed. And then... |
|
The Mars rovers -- another unmanned mission -- taught us more about the landscape than we have ever known. If its the scientific advances and exploration of the unknown that matter most about the space program, then unmanned missions are simply more efficient. I understand and sympathize with the romantic view of manned space flight, but if we're thinking of scientific advance, should romantic notions have anyplace in the equation?
|
MindPilot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
23. In my best Stewie voice: "Oh...well,then... |
libhill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
cleaning up this planet, and looking for alternatives to fossil fuels? Piss on wars and manned space exploration. Never A Straight Awnser (NASA) will never tell us the truth about anything out there anyway.
|
Ready4Change
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. Or "Reason for living." |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 10:07 AM by Ready4Change
What is life without exploration and adventure.
I'd far rather be out there seeing what's what, expanding our chances to spread our species to other worlds, than sitting here blindly on a rock, waiting for some lumbering disaster to end our tedious existance.
(edited for typoes.)
|
dhinojosa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. I'd rather see that than dead bodies (ours and theirs) |
|
Actually I'd rather see people fed and schooled. But this was something nice to see in our dreary years.
|
Nabia2004
(566 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
14. You can thank the Space Program for that PC your typing on |
SteppingRazor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. One more time, very quickly... |
|
I am completely for the space program. I am not for the shuttle program. It is outdated and far too expensive for the results it offers. I think NASA should fly more unmanned missions and spend more on R&D for the next generation of manned space flights.
|
Redstone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
22. They should have built the DynaSoar instead of the Shuttle. |
|
it would have been 100% re-usable, and probably safer.
Redstone
|
barb162
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
33. That and also how much that smoke was screwing up the atmosphere |
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message |
2. My ass is *still* kicked |
jojo54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Myself, I will never mind putting tax dollars to work on these missions....just as long as they don't bow to timeline pressures and cutting corners.
and IMHO, I think eventually we'll find other life out there. Anybody else???
|
dhinojosa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Yep.....but not until we drop religious fanatism..... |
|
I don't want to go into any galactic war over god, or Ythex, as they call their god.
|
Ready4Change
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
What right thinking civilization would worship a dumb diety like Ythex anyway?
Jihad! Jihad!
(kidding)
|
johannes1984
(210 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
19. you're on to something |
|
maybe we could whisper the republicans a rumor about ythex , and his pro choice , pro peace , pro happy people filth of a religion ....bet ya they'ld go right to the floor and ask for an 'alian religion regulation and registration act ' .
|
dhinojosa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
25. Ythex bless America, I can't believe you said that? |
|
Where are your moral values?
hehe
|
libhill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 12:01 PM by libhill
but we'll never know it, the Government will cover it up. A little green man could take a crap on the shuttle, and they'd find a way to lie about it, or explain it away.
|
johannes1984
(210 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |
|
something ole's school cool about america on worldwide television for once .....kick ass indeed chum .....almost made me reminiscent about the good ole days :D
|
datadiva
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I have Dish and watched it on Nasa channel. You hear more and don't have to listen to the MSM commentators. I thought it was awsome.
|
Goldmund
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message |
20. You mean the fuel tank? |
dhinojosa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
Sgent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-26-05 11:54 AM
Response to Original message |
|
is on the otherside of the room -- Just watched the replay.
I get teary eyed every time I see one of these things. It reminds me that regardless of all the f*ckups we have, we have achieved a truley stupendeous thing. We don't have the pyramids or the colossus, this is our wonder of the world.
As for manned vs. unmanned, unmanned flights can do much of what we need, at a lower cost, science wise. However, manned flights still play a vital role in a lot of areas -- espcially when retrieval and various physiology experiments are needed. The shuttle itself is outdated and based on old technology, but I thought NASA was already developing its successor.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |