Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bushists Try to Sneak in Language Shift in WoT to Distract from Failures.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:05 PM
Original message
Bushists Try to Sneak in Language Shift in WoT to Distract from Failures.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/26/politics/26strategy.html?ei=5094&en=84d917f2326e4105&hp=&ex=1122436800&partner=homepage&pagewanted=print


July 26, 2005
U.S. Officials Retool Slogan for Terror War

By ERIC SCHMITT and THOM SHANKER

WASHINGTON, July 25 - ...

In recent speeches and news conferences, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and the nation's senior military officer have spoken of "a global struggle against violent extremism" rather than "the global war on terror," which had been the catchphrase of choice. Administration officials say that phrase may have outlived its usefulness, because it focused attention solely, and incorrectly, on the military campaign.

Gen. Richard B. Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the National Press Club on Monday that he had "objected to the use of the term 'war on terrorism' before, because if you call it a war, then you think of people in uniform as being the solution." He said the threat instead should be defined as violent extremists, with the recognition that "terror is the method they use."

Although the military is heavily engaged in the mission now, he said, future efforts require "all instruments of our national power, all instruments of the international communities' national power." The solution is "more diplomatic, more economic, more political than it is military," he concluded.

Administration and Pentagon officials say the revamped campaign has grown out of meetings of President Bush's senior national security advisers that began in January, and it reflects the evolution in Mr. Bush's own thinking nearly four years after the Sept. 11 attacks.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Meyers got a clue?
like duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....

four years too late?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KarenInMA Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. "a global struggle against violent extremism"
Domestic violence is violent extremism. Let's spend as much money combatting that as we have in Iraq so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's got the perfect clunky, unpoetic rattle for these tone-deaf jackasses
Let's just call Republicanism violent extremism and get it over with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nguoihue Donating Member (135 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. "... evolution in Mr. Bush's own thinking ..."
Give me a break. Bush's own thinking ... ha ha ha The new catchphrase had to come from his neocon puppeteers.

Wonder if making up lies to invade a sovereign country and killing tens of thousands of their citizens so he and his cronies can take control of their oil qualifies as violent extremism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. More like unintelligent design in Bush's "thinking."
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder if that means
that we should treat it as a law enforcement problem? Where have I heard that before? I wonder, I wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think they'd rather eat their own tongues than use that phrase.
Might I suggest to them taking lots of mustard into the mouth beforehand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Slogan"
that just disgusts me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. What they need is an anti-terror mascot!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalish Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. they're objecting to the use of the word war now?
give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Otm Shank Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. "The War on Terror" will henceforth be known as
"Freedom Lies"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. trying to reword it for use against left-leaning US citizens
Pretty transparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Fred Kaplan notices the acronym changes from G-WOT to G-SAVE

http://slate.msn.com/id/2123412/

It took four years for the president of the United States to realize that fighting terrorism has a political component? It took six months for his senior advisers to retool a slogan? We are witnessing that rare occasion when the phrase "I don't know whether to laugh or cry" can be uttered without lapsing into cliché.

But the shallowness gets deeper still. The Times story doesn't notice what appears to be the driving force behind the new slogan—a desire for a happier acronym.

Look at the first letters of Global War on Terrorism. GWOT. What does that mean; how is it pronounced? Gwot? Too frivolously rowdy, like a fight scene in a Marvel comic book (Bam! Pfooff! Gwot!). Gee-wot? Sounds like a garbled question (Gee what?).

Then look at Global Struggle Against Violent Extremism. Its acronym is GSAVE—i.e., gee-save. We're out to save the world, see, not wage war on it. Or, as national security adviser Stephen Hadley puts it in the Times piece, "We need to dispute both the gloomy vision and offer a positive alternative."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC