Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 07:29 PM
Original message |
Why does Dipshit* keep saying we're safer now that Saddam is gone? |
|
There are about 9.5 million Iraqis who have had to witness or live through the carnage and destruction that Dipshit* created.
Plenty of them are probably outraged to the point where they will harm or kill, though I'll admit a small handful of them are now happy for the conditions Bush* has bestowed upon them. All that democracy and freedom and fair elections and learning facilities and water and oil and protected nuclear facilities and keeping their few remaining relics and treasures of the human race safe... :eyes:
And our troops make easy targets as well, and let's face it - they were just following orders so that vindicates them of all possible wrongdoing. (or does it? Bush* didn't want captured Iraqi troops to use the phrase.)
Sorry Dipshit*, you're wrong. The world is not safer. Neither is the US, which is really what you mean - all your non-war issues have proven you don't give a fuck about the world unless it means an extra $ for your corporate buddies. For if even one of the Iraqi malcontents you created goes to somebody who has resources and convinces them to turn against you...
I don't think the world is safer. The fact people are still dying over there damn well proves nobody ain't safer or even jack shit!
And you* are talking out of your* gassy bloated ass.
|
XanaDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They have to spin this crap like this.
|
w13rd0
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 07:31 PM
Response to Original message |
2. He doesn't even mean the US... |
|
...he's following his fathers advice, making the world safe for wealthy white men. That's all, that's the sum total of their agenda...
|
CoffeePlease1947
(621 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 07:34 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Because Bush's poll numbers are down because of the war which means |
|
that he will be gone soon and the country will be safe again.
Mike
|
AnnabelLee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Because he's a congenital liar.
|
KidneyStoner
(56 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 07:43 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Not safer ... and Saddam not gone either |
|
Out of power? Mostly but not completely.
We're sure as hell not safer.
It's a misdirection ploy because Saddam is not gone. Can't say that so mix a little spin with a bald-faced lie and you come up with what passes for the truth.
These clowns don't bother with mixing in the truth once in a while. Guess you don't need to worry about what's true and what's false if everything is false. Now I get it.
|
southern democrat
(625 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 08:32 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I don't know if we are safer or not, but we're damn sure poorer! |
otohara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-27-03 08:34 PM
Response to Original message |
7. He Would Say That If Asked About Social Security |
|
or the enviornment, abortion, civil rights, or anything. This is what he is programed to do.
Stick to the message, no matter what the question.
We are safer now, the Iraqi people are free & safer...blah, blah, blah...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:36 AM
Response to Original message |