ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:45 AM
Original message |
Got A Call From The FBI Yesterday |
|
Phone rings. I pick up.
"This is Agent XXXXX, from the FBI. Can i ask you a couple of questions?" I told him "Sure". (I did ask for corroboration, a phone number where he could be reached, etc.) Then i called HIM back, and really did get the FBI front desk. So, it's all legit.
Well, anyway apparently as part of their responsibility to HSD, they are randomly perusing files and he asked, "Has anyone contacted you regarding your chemical knowledge of explosives?" I said "No. If someone had, i would have called you guys." He said thanks, and that was it.
Seems a fairly inefficient way to combat terrosism. The Professor
|
KarenInMA
(821 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Should have said, "why yes. All these anti-abortion folks |
|
call me all the time. I wonder why"..
:evilgrin:
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I Should Have Thought Of That |
|
However, probably best not to mess with the FBI when you have an explosives file with them. Ya think? The Professor
|
Jara sang
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Why they aren't terrorist |
|
they are fetus liberators.
|
KarenInMA
(821 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. Aren't abortion doctors fetus liberators? |
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
28. Only in an Iraqi innocent civilian collateral damage |
Catholic Sensation
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. yeah I'm sure the FBI would have a wonderful sense of humor about that |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 09:49 AM by Catholic Sensation
HEY YOU SHOULD HAVE SAID "I DON'T KNOW, HEY OSAMA, HAVE WE GOTTEN ANY CALLS HERE ABOUT EXPLOSIVES?"!!!
|
ck4829
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
15. Do you want the Professor to join Lil Kim in jail? |
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. I Know I Don't Want That! |
|
Especially since i didn't do anything. The Professor
|
tsuki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
44. Don't ever say anything like that. In fact, take the name and badge |
|
number and tell him you'll call him back when you have a tape recorder. Identify them on the tape before you answer any questions, and if you feel uncomfortable with the questions, say so and say you want to consult your attorney. If Freeportgate showed me anything, it showed me to not to be sarcastic or unrecorded. They can make a mountain out of a molehill, especially if they claim you confessed.
Dangerous times for Dems folks. We are considered just a bit right of the "struggle against extremism."
|
tanyev
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:47 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I'm SURE any scientist who did help a potential terrorist |
|
would tell an FBI agent all about it.
:sarcasm:
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Apparently i'm not a suspect. They're just checking. Like i said, seems inefficient. But, i did due diligence, and it really was the FBI. The Professor
|
AzDar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Well, Professor...that confirms my suspicions...we're all doomed!! lol.... |
slackmaster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Here our federal government scored a major blow against terrorism |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 09:49 AM by slackmaster
By shutting down our local pirate radio station, which had by far the best programming available in the area. :eyes: http://www.pirate969.org/
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. See, They're Doing Their Jobs, Just Wonderful |
|
Ultimate example of efficiency! And, some $80k a year guy calls me on the phone to combat terrorism. The Professor
|
Cocoa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message |
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
No he seemed brighter than that! Lots. He was, in fact, very pleasant and business-like. The Professor
|
wicket
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Interesting - CIA and NSA just answer with 4 digits and do not |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 09:54 AM by papau
admit who they are.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. How Would You Know That? |
|
How come you get called by NSA and CIA? How come! The Professor
|
DBoon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
He'd have to arrange for you to meet "an unfortunate accident"
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
31. Then I Don't Need To Know! |
|
I'm not stupid! The Professor
|
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
37. Long ago that was of interest for me - but a wait for the clearance |
|
put me in private industry - for good.
But after 2 years of unreal invasion of privacy and trace backs of all around me I got my "high" clearance (back then there were only a dozen levels of high "top secret" clearance - I am told they have over 300 levels now!)
In any case, they "promoted" me (my entrance grade and pay on offer acceptance went up in various communications to me) for about 10 years after that. Last 30 years have been quiet!
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #37 |
45. So, You're NOT Spying On Me, Then |
|
Whew! I was worried there. The Professor
|
papau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #45 |
Occulus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |
18. You could have really put a burr under their asses |
|
"Why, no. I would have called you. I'll be sure to keep an eye out for that anthrax mailer, though. By the way, how are those pre-9/11 translations coming along?"
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. I Figured It Best Not To Tweak Them |
|
They've already got me on a list. Why irritate them further? Getting higher on the list so that more than a simple phone call is involved would be a bad thing. The Professor
|
ultraist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
48. Maybe they just wanted to let you know, they know where you live! |
|
Perhaps, the question about anyone contacting you about your knowledge of explosives was just an excuse, to call you and remind you that you are being watched. ;)
Actually, I think they are digging deeper into the Universities because many of those associated with terrorist attacks have attended Universities.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #48 |
52. I Don't Work At A Uni Anymore Though |
|
Besides, it's not that hard to find out where someone lives. Probably could do that over the internet anyway. The only reason to call me is my knowledge of explosives. That's it.
The Professor
|
Blue-Jay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Does that mean that we're NOT gonna make explosives this weekend?
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
Lannes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message |
22. Could they be monitoring your internet habits? |
|
and found that you post on DU?
Obviously it doesnt mean anything sinister to rational people but these arent rational people.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
24. My Names Been On This List Since The Late 70's |
|
I was fingerprinted, had a background check, pictures taken. The whole deal. This wasn't a surprise. You can't take the type of instruction i took without this standard being met.
The Professor
|
dweller
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message |
23. of course, you were cleared to talk about this |
|
during an ongoing investigation?
:tinfoilhat:
dp
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
|
And, i'm not being investigated. That's why i was concerned about the relative inefficiency of this approach. Seems fairly unproductive.
The Professor
|
mtnester
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
30. Probably had one of them there "truth machines" hooked up to the line |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 10:17 AM by mtnester
just for you! :tinfoilhat:
On edit - or one of them there voice imprint thingys.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
32. Voice Pattern Thingie? |
|
Well, i told the truth, so i'm off the hook! The Professor
|
BrotherBuzz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
53. Are you sure you didn't small talk golf scores? |
|
Lying to an FBI agent is a crime! :evilgrin:
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #53 |
|
I can really shoot in the low 70's. Done it a bunch of times this year. So, that's not a lie either. The Professor
|
BrotherBuzz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #56 |
|
I know you shoot in the low 70's, but they can't believe you, and that's their benchmark on truth/lying: Your golf score response measured a lie in their world, so your lack of contact response is a lie, too...just a thought, Professor. ;)
I think I'm going to hit a bucket of balls today and try out some old persimmon woods that are new to me. A complete set - one through five (including a four wood)!
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #58 |
61. Are Wooden Woods Still Legal? |
|
Just kidding. They do look good, don't they? The Professor
|
BrotherBuzz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #61 |
62. They sound good, too. |
dweller
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
RaleighNCDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message |
26. Sounds pretty efficient to me. |
|
Sure, they may not catch any terrorists that way, but it's a good way to let your average citizen know "we are watching you - we know who you are and where to find you".
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
29. Yeah, But I Already Knew That |
|
My name has been on file since the late 70's when i learned my knowledge of explosives and bombs. They won't let you take the short courses taught by ACE without a background check, fingerprints, & pix. So, i've known for over 25 years that they knew i was one to follow. I'm just surprised that this was considered a way to combat terrosism. Random phone calls to someone who's been on their list for this long to see if i would admit to being contacted by a terror group. If i had and was concerned, i would have called them. If i had, and was one of the bad guys, i wouldn't admit it. Seemed kind of silly. The Professor
|
Nihil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
55. Maybe they're just washing their lists? |
|
Cold-calling just to check that it's not stale data (like all reputable telemarketing firms do!).
|
pitohui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
34. quite an efficient way to combat prematurely anti-fascist thinking tho |
|
lying to an fbi agent is a federal crime
they have been known to twist any slight moment of confusion or really any statement at all into what they say is a lie
best never to answer fbi questions if you can help it
and if you must answer such questions don't elaborate on the statement, a simple yes or no will do
"if someone had, i would have called you guys," says you, but you know not their definition of "anyone" or "contact," a contact could be an email you never even opened, a phone call you forgot to return because it was a little off or you were busy or you never knew what it was really about
the fbi has their own definition of words and a man i know had troubles because he said "printer," where the fbi said "computer" -- by the fbi definition even your microwave is a computer if it has an integrated circuit in it -- very easy to trip someone up -- it was a damn printer not a computer -- still the man ends up in a rico case -- big mess
cointelpro teaches us that if the fbi can't pin a crime on a person because they are innocent, they may convict the person of "lying to the fbi"
scary stuff
don't know how an innocent person can protect themselves other than not to answer snoopy questions
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
|
If i was, i wouldn't have taken the ACE courses back in the day and gotten an FBI file in the first place. I'm on file. I can't do anything about that now. The Professor
|
pitohui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 10:25 AM by pitohui
however much point to good planning
we all have a file if we've ever done anything really, best to keep answers to questions as simple as possible
i'm sure your attorney has told you the same
i think you'll be fine but i also think the fbi is not being inefficient here, which was the complaint
they will have their choice of people to round up when they need to if they need to, on obstruction and lying charges alone, with much documentation already to hand
would be nice to avoid being in the group that could be picked up on charges that look real to the media
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
|
Besides, too late now. The Professor
|
sakabatou
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message |
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
39. Not Really That Weird |
|
I suppose i should have noted in the first post that i've had a file with them since around 1977 because of some special instruction i took with the A.C.E. It required b'ground checks, pix and fingerprints. So, i've known for a long time that they know about me. But, i've never actually used the skills i learned, so i'm clean. I'm not worried about myself. I just thought this was a silly way to protect the homeland. The Professor
|
noamnety
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message |
40. You called him back at the number he gave you |
|
and someone answered "FBI"?
I'm sure it was them, but that struck me as funny all the same - like you should ask him what office he's at, then go look up yourself what the phone number for the branch is.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
42. No! I Short Formed The Story |
|
I did due diligence before i answered any questions. I didn't cover the entire detail of that part of the conversation. I did exactly what you suggested. I asked for the primary number of the facility at which he was based, then checked the number for that location in the blue pages. I just didn't cover that detail the first time. I didn't think it important. But, i should have since it made you concerned. My fault. The Professor
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
47. I thought of that instantly too! If I were pulling a scam, I'd have |
|
an accomplice to answer the "font desk" phone too!
The only way you can check this for sure is to contact your local FBI office, give the info you have, and ask them to confirm or deny it's validity.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #47 |
|
I just didn't think it important to cover all the details of due diligence. I did all that the poster suggested. The Professor
|
ultraist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |
43. They contacted professors at my alma mater too |
|
But of course, that was AFTER the London bombing when they discovered a previous grad student/TA from NCSU was involved.
It's kind of weird to think that I was living in the same town as this terrorist.
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
|
Yeah, that's a little closer than i want to be to any extremist. The Professor
|
HockeyMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:35 AM
Response to Original message |
50. Two FBI agents came knocking on my door 2 months ago |
|
Scared the hell out of me. They showed me their badges and picture ID's. They wanted to know what I knew about the man across the street. I am renting and just moved here a few months ago. I have only seen the man (older man in his 50s or 60s) outside getting into his car or mowing the lawn and told them so. I think he lives alone there since I have never seen a woman or kids at that house.
I have no way of knowing if they were legit or not, but I watched from my window as they went to the house next door too.
|
noamnety
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #50 |
60. That's nothing to be scared about |
|
He's most likely a government employee or contractor with a clearance. Every few years they renew your clearance with a new background check, and it's standard procedure to go around to the neighbors asking questions for that.
So please don't be looking at him like he's a terrorist for the next few years!
stupid side story for that: during Desert Storm I needed my clearance updated, and I was living in family housing at the university, which was 95% foreign families. Some of the people they asked told me about it afterward: "They asked if I was a US Citizen, I said no, I'm Jordanian, and then they asked 'Well, if you WERE an American citizen, would you trust her with state secrets?'". My clearance was held up for a while, and finally an agent called me at my house to say they were having problems because they had to develop contacts from the last 5 years, and couldn't find any Americans in my community who knew me (I was living overseas for a chunk of that time). Apparently they had staked out my one American friend's house for a week, sitting through some awful weather - too far from a parking area to watch from a car, waiting for her to come home - during the week she was away on vacation. :)
|
hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Anyways, you just blew a perfectly good business opportunity.
When someone from the government calls and asks you "Has anyone contacted you regarding your chemical knowledge of explosives?" you should answer "Why do you ask? Are you hiring?"
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
57. They Could Have Hired Me YEARS Ago |
|
If they wanted me they could have called me 25 years ago. So, i just figure they don't want a weirdo like me around. The Professor
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message |
59. A friend of mine back in '60s was hauled away for questioning. |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 11:09 AM by Tierra_y_Libertad
He was a sporadic, non-violent, anti-war protestor, who didn't belong to any radical organizations. But, he had worked as a dynamiter in some mine in Michigan.
Apparantly, the FBI goons had taken a picture of him at some protest, tracked his name down through an informant, checked his Air Force Records (he had gotten out by claiming to be a Communist) and started putting things together.
He's not the kind of guy to be intimidated by anything, and thought the whole thing hilarious.
Many years later, I came home from work and found an FBI agent's card in my mailbox with a note on the back to call him. I had been very active in the anti-war movement, participated in some violent demonstrations, had my picture taken several times, belonged to a couple of "radical" organizations and associated with several more.
As it turned out, the agent was doing a "background" check on a neighbor I didn't know.
I breathed a sigh of relief.
Nothing came of it, but
|
ProfessorGAC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #59 |
63. I Admit To Some Intitial Trepidation |
|
That's why i told him i'd call him back. Some people were concerned that i called back at the same number, but i neglected, in the OP, to mention that i confirmed the number as a field office. But, when he first called, i was nervous thinking "Why would the FBI call me?" Once i knew why, i just thought it was a silly method to track down potential terrorist activities. The Professor
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #63 |
64. As well you should. Those creeps don't exactly have a sterling record. |
|
Especially concerning civil liberties.
|
Susang
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-28-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 11:34 AM by Susang
What a fun day you had! :eyes:
On edit: Glad you double checked their info! :-)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message |