Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Republican Presidents I know

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Beaver Tail Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 03:27 PM
Original message
The Republican Presidents I know
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 03:48 PM by Beaver Tail
This is not meant to start a fight but I took a look at a lot of issues that have come back to haunt the United States and was curious to see who was the president at the time that these problems started.

I will not draw conclusions but let others support and/or debunk and/or correct and/or add to as they see fit.

Here is what I found

1953–1961
Dwight David Eisenhower – President
Richard Nixon – Vice President

Problems started during this Presidency that would later haunt America

Shah of Iran become Leader after Coup (arranged by CIA) of democratically elected government
USA Becomes involved in Vietnam Conflict

1969–1974
Richard Nixon – President
Spiro Agnew (1969–1973) – Vice President
Gerald R. Ford (1973–1974) – Vice President

Problems started during this Presidency that would later haunt America

Watergate
Augusto Pinochet becomes leader of Chile after Coup (arranged by CIA) of democratically elected government

1981-1987
Ronald Regan – President
George H. W. Bush – Vice President

Problems started during this Presidency that would later haunt America
Invasion of Central America
Iran-Contra
Support for Mujahideen (Osama bin Laden)
rise of the "Religious Right" added on edit
deregulation added on edit
Armed Saddam added on edit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. So if you look at it a certain way, it make George W. Bush look good
I mean, we don't have to wait around for disaster to strike with Bush. He gets right to it!

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh but what don't we
even know yet? Now that's a scarey thought!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suneel112 Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Other problems started under Reagan...
the rise of the "Religious Right" and the congressional turnover of the South from our party to the GOP. Also the loss of the strength of Unions, the deregulation in America, the first wave of "outsourcing", destroying Carter's energy plan, and the list goes on. This all lead to today's "Mourning in America".

The DU should regard Reagan, more than Bush, as a curseword to Democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaver Tail Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thank you
I guess you can call this a littel research project for me. I will also be looking at Dem leaders as well. Have to be fair
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navvet Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. At the risk of a huge flame war
I hasten to point out that according to the "Vietnam war course" I took in college,

It was good old Harry Truman that involved us in Viet Nam by agreeing to help back the French in their attempt to reconquest Viet Nam after WW2.

simple fairness requires honesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaver Tail Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. This is very true
I guess I should say "Direct" involvement as the role with the French as a support involvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Eisenhower was the first president to send US troops to Vietnam.
1955 Eisenhower sent troops into Vietnam as advisers. April 1959 President Eisenhower commits the United States to maintaining South Vietnam's independence. July 1959: Two U.S. advisors are the first Americans killed, in guerrilla attack 20 miles north of Saigon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. There wasn't any real reconquering required...
... the British had occupied Vietnam from a few months before the end of WWII, until the end of the war. Control of Vietnam reverted to France at Japan's surrender because of previous arrangements made at Yalta.

The French reoccupied the country, and Ho's troops immediately began trying to drive them out. Truman did provide some monetary help to the French, but there were no US personnel of any note in the country until Eisenhower sent in the CIA after Dien Bien Phu to destabilize the North and the South in order to cause the upcoming 1956 UN-sponsored and supervised elections to fail. The CIA was successful in that effort, and the core of CIA people there would go on to help Diem to power in the South. The first military personnel ("advisers") would be ordered in by Eisenhower in 1958.

That's the way I remember it.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Don't forget arming Saddam to the gills so he could fight the Iranians
Edited on Thu Jul-28-05 03:43 PM by Feles Mala
OVER THERE, so we wouldn't have to fight them over here. It was about this time that Saddam used "weapons of mass destruction (nerve gas) on his own people." Hmmm... how the hell did he get that?

THEN, under Bush I, Paps called on Iraqi's to come out in the open and over throw Saddam, which they do. But Pappy doesn't think it's prudent to give them the air support, so they gut cut down en masse by Saddam. How could it get any better? We invade 11 years later with great loss of civilian lives. Am I the only one who never wonders why they hate us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Don't forget Ford...
... it was Ford, after all, who brought us the Bobsey Twins, Rumsfeld and Cheney. It was Cheney who recommended George H.W. Bush for Director of Central Intelligence. It was Rumsfeld who first got his chance to use his "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" routine with regard to Soviet weapons systems.

It was Bush who allowed the so-called "Team B" into the back door of the CIA, which is the real start of the politicization of the agency. And, it was William Casey who was on Ford's Presidential Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (along with Edward Teller and John Foster) who sought to greatly inflate the threat posed by the Soviets in an attempt to force the U.S. into a whole new arms race--which they did manage to accomplish during Reagan's term--though that race was largely one-sided.

It was also Ford who made the quid pro quo to pardon Nixon.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Eisenhower - Cold War Nuclear Arm's Race
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC