Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean on Face the Nation 10:30 EST

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:39 AM
Original message
Dean on Face the Nation 10:30 EST
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:00 AM by Karmadillo
Schieffer is saying he took the same position Newt Gingrich took regarding Medicare cuts. Dean is saying he supported what Clinton signed. Could be an interesting half hour.

On Edit: Added time show was on television (at least in my area).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dean is going hard after Clark for being a Republican
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Clark is not a Republican
Another one of Deans lies. This show is highlighting what a liar Dean is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. can you explain the video of Clark praising Rummy, Dick and Bush then?
just curious

Clark said Bush* is exactly what this country needs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I can ...
This is a report of what Clark said in addressing this:

"So when I got out of the military and into business I looked at both parties," Clark explained to the crowd on why he was a Democrat. "I talked to Condoleeza Rice right away. I found out I didn't like her view on foreign policy. She said American troops shouldn't do peacekeeping they should do real fighting. But she is an academic, what does she know? I've been on the front lines. I tried to explain it to her. She let me know she was going to be in charge. And I spoke out on the election campaign on what we are trying to do on behalf of Bosnia and the Balkans and so forth. And when I went home to Arkansas I was in business and I wanted to meet both sides. The Republicans came to me and said 'Hey we would like for you to speak at our Lincoln Day fund-raiser. I said I am not going to be there for Lincoln Day. They said 'General we'll hold Lincoln Day whenever you can get here.' So I did. I spoke to about 450 Republicans there at Embassy Suites. I was non-partisan. I basically praised Republicans for being Republicans. . . . But I knew what the Republican Party was like and I couldn't indentify with that party. They are the party that when I was commanding in Kosovo, they were the party led by Tom Delay against our airman who were in the skies over Yugoslavia taking fire from Serb anti-aircraft and this party voted against them. They claimed they weren't. They claimed they were voting against just a policy, but I read what they said. They wanted the policy to fail. They didn't have a vision. They didn't understand what America was about. They put their interest of the party above the interest of the party. I'll never put the interest of the party above the interest of the country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Well, in response to a Republican charge that Dean is a "flip-flopper",
Dean told Schieffer that when new facts come along, he changes his position if appropriate. Perhaps Clark would say the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
28. I believe Clark IS a repuke.
He voted for and supported Nixon and Reagan. If that isn't repuke I don't know what is. Who ever heard of a 4 star general that is a Democrat ? Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SWPAdem Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #28
50. Damn
I guess I'm not a Democrat anymore, either, since I have voted for a few Repugs in the past also. I guess all those liberals that I knew during my time in the Army were fakers, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #28
53. I also voted for Reagan....
Does that mean I can never run as a Democratic candidate....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #53
65. How many Democrats did you vote for?
It is possible he voted for more Republicans than Democrats. I find that hard to believe in your case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #65
87. or ask how many meetings did the poster take with repubs?
for all the dems who've voted for repubs, did you also have meetingS
with republicans about the possibility of running for office as a republican within the last 2 years???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #87
104. I've met 2 Republican Presidents....
Nixon and Ford. Had a tour of Congress with Jerry Ford, met Bob Dole. Been to tons of Republican fundraisers.

I'm NOW the only Democrat on both sides of the family.

Please don't question MY Democratic credentials - I've worked on 7 Democratic campaigns up and will work on another this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #104
105. you skipped half of the scenerio.
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 11:12 AM by bearfartinthewoods
i didn't say who met repubs i said had meetings with them to discuss reunning for office as one of them. if you have had meetings with republicans to discuss running as a republican, i question your liberal and dem credentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #105
107. The Republican Party talked to me about running for office....
for State Senator. I did mull it over - but decided not to because I do not like the "spotlight."

I've worked on two campaigns for Republicans - 7 for Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #65
100. I voted Republican until the Clarence Thomas situation....
I was born into a Republican family - I'm the only Liberal on both sides of the family. It's very difficult to see another point of view when you're in these environments. I would imagine that the military is such an environment.

I would have voted for Kennedy against my family's wishes but was only 9 at the time... LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #100
134. that was over a decade ago..we're talkin about less than 2 years here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
123. Dean is not a "liar" ...you just llike to pop up on theads and bash
Dean whenever so whatever you say about Dean should be taken with the whole salt pond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
88. WHY does he spend all this time attacking Clark? What about HIS
stance on the issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #88
109. I watched the interview and saw it differently.
Let me say that I like them both very much and would love to vote for either one of them. But I didn't hear Dean attacking Clark. He was raising a valid point; the general has admitted to voting for Republicans. He never attacked him on issues.

Clark has the ability to pull the most votes away from Kerry and Lieberman and that benefits Dean as well as Clark.

If you are a believer in Dean's willingness to pick Clark as a running mate, then it helps tremendously to have someone who is seen as a former Republican by your side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #109
110. He ain't going to get Clark as a VP candidate this way.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #88
120. You can read about
Dean's stances on the issues at his web site. But you already knew that, didn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. This guy is nothing but a damn liar.
He say Clark "advocated" the US going to war against Iraq. LIE
He said he did not take the same position as Newt Gingrich. LIE
He says Clark was a Republican. LIE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Clark DId Advocate Supporting the War Resolution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Joe Connason addressed this better than I can.
-snip-

"On his first outing, Mr. Clark provided his adversaries an easy target when he made a typical novice error: He told the truth about a complex problem. Specifically, he confessed to ambivalence about the proper way to deal with Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. That led some of his more eager critics to declare his candidacy almost ruined only days after he declared himself. On the ABC News Web site, an anonymous Democrat wailed in "despair and anger." That single moment of vacillation, it was said, could even "define" the former NATO Supreme Commander—as if he had said and done nothing else in his 58 years.

-snip-

What did Mr. Clark utter to provoke such silly overreaction? He acknowledged that the resolution on Iraq confronted Senators with a difficult decision. They could vote no—and embolden Saddam to block the U.N. inspectors from returning to Baghdad. Or they could vote yes—and offer George W. Bush a "blank check" to wage an unwise and unjustified war.

-snip-

"At the time, I probably would have voted for it, but I think that’s too simple a question," he explained. "I don’t know if I would have or not. I’ve said it both ways because when you get into this, what happens is you have to put yourself in a position—on balance, I probably would have voted for it." But his purpose in voting for the resolution, as he also explained, would have been to build "leverage for a U.N.-based solution." He would have fought for a resolution similar to one supported by some Democrats, requiring the President to seek further approval before invading."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
20. When did he? Got any proof? Please present it. I want..
to see text in Clark's own words him advocating going to war against Iraq. I don't want to see indirect quotes or an overview of what someone thinks he said. Please provide text that clark advocated going to war with Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #20
30. The AP article from last Fall has been broadcast here often
I don't have a copy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
29. LIE
For the record, the comment that followed Clark’s statement that he’d “probably” have supported the Bush resolution on Iraq was followed by, “but, I think that’s too simple a question.”

Unlike Dean, who just bashes other candidates for their voting records (even though those candidates are dealing with a political minefield in this area), Clark actually tries to give an honest answer.

After reviewing the resolution, Clark clarified that he would not have voted for it as drafted.

Easy for Dean to say he would not have voted for the resolution. Dean, he would have done whatever he felt was in "Dean's best interest" if he had had to vote on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. You are talking about the plane interview last week, I'm
talking about a quote from last year during the debate on the resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
117. He did NOT support going to war.
There's a difference, we've been through that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Another lie.
He stated that he was against raising the retirement age. I just read the other day he backed away from raising it to 70 but was still consider raising it to 68. I guess this didn't poll well so he changed his position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Last October he was quoted as supporting it. How is that a lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Closer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
21. YOU NEED TO GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT
"MOM"

Your posts look ignorant.

Clark DID advocate this war.

Clark WAS a Republican.

Do your research, instead of mindlessly following the Clarkies on THIS site. Because that'll get you NOWHERE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #21
39. I deal in facts.
That's why I can't stand Dean. Hmm.. attacking my posts as "ignorant." When I was in public accounting it was a dead give away when the client attacked you personally that they didn't have a leg to stand on. Obviously, that must be a universal truth which also applies to politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Closer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #39
52. And that's why
I attacked your post, not you.


And you obviously DON'T deal in facts looking at your posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #39
78. Have you looked at your posts lately Ms Manners?
You call posters liars (without bothering to provide even one link it should be noted), you lie about Dean's statements on MTP. You have some nerve criticising us as negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #39
125. You do Not deal in facts.
you deal in mindless bashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #21
54. Dean Nailed Clark's Vulnerabilities
That's what you do when you've laid out your positions and the new guy hasn't laid out his. Clark set this up by only declaring allegiance two weeks ago. It's a question on everyone's mind. Dean even said that it appears Clark is a Dem. now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #54
59. What Dean did was show his true colors ...
and they are not pleasing.

Intellectually dishonest.

Say anything to get elected.

Harhly judgemental without regard to facts.

Sanctimonious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #59
67. Did you just call someone Sanctimonious?
Interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #67
74. it shouldn't.
Santimony is Dean's stock-in-trade.

BTW, why haven't you gotten to my posts that deals with these issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #59
126. I love Dean's "Colors"!
Red, White, and Blue!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SWPAdem Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:18 AM
Original message
Sounds like a case of the pot calling the kettle black, to me
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
35. On the subject of lies
Dean said he would consider raising the retirement age to 68. I considered going to the Cincinnati Cleveland game today but didn't. Similarly Dean considered raising the age and desided on something else (increasing the top income that can be taxed by SS). Try not lying in the future while decrying other people's 'lies'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Just what should we call a person
who voted for Nixon in 72, Reagan in 80 and 84, and Bush 1 in 88? I would call that a Republican. Add to that his fundraiser for Huckabee and Hutchinson and I think again Republican is a good name for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
96. your forgot that he was courting or courted by AK repubs about
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 11:09 AM by bearfartinthewoods
running for congress when he retired? he took meetingS to discuss the idea. meetingS as in plural.

how many meetings would you take with repubs about running as a repub?

most LIBERALS would laugh at the idea from the git go but it took clark meetingS to decide not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SWPAdem Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Yeah,
and Dean is allowed to change his mind on issues when he gets new facts, but Clark, apparently is not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
124. your assaults on Dean mean 0.
you lost your credibility weeks ago...mindless bashing has its repercussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IranianDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
130. Thank you Dean for showing the country what a lying whore you are!
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #130
132. you call Dean "a lying whore" because he spoke the truth...
what does that make you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. Dean Supported CLintons Medicaid Plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I Support We Were Talking About Medicare....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Point Being it was CLintons Plan he supported, if Gingrich also supported
similar plans, so be it. He did not support Gingrich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
106. he's flip-flopped on THAT issue several times....
BEFORE he became a "Liberal" candidate for President he had a a very harsh (and Republican) stance on it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. Dean Gave reasons for claiming Clark was a Repug
Voting in the past for Repugs, praising the Bushco players.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Dean using this ...
makes me think far less of Dean. e might well be falling out of second place for intellectual dishonesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. With the evidence on the table, it makes since to go after Clark
on this point. It's not like there is no support for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. the "support" for it is there only if one is intellectually dishonest.
Otherwise, I would think you would address what I have posted above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Dean Is Starting To Remind Me Of Bob Dole On His Worst Days........
He's just plain mean....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. Dean will say anything to win. He's such a creep.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #26
40. President Dean....ahhhh....sounds good to me!
gin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. I'm glad it sounds good in your head...
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:03 AM by Bleachers7
because you will never hear it in your ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #26
112. He's only out for himself.... He's attacked all the other candidates
said he might dissuade his campaign workers from working for another candidate if he loses the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #112
118. He never said any such thing
Post a link to a quote where Dean says he'll dissuade his campaign workers from working for another candidate if he loses the nomination. Either post it or admit it's complete bullshit.

Dean has said repeatedly that he will support whoever the nominee is and will also work to help them. He's just concerned that some of his supporters won't support others if he asks them to. He has no control over that.

I didn't see the show in question of hear what he said, but if Dean did criticize Clark about something it means that Dean is disgusted with whatever it was he talked about. That's why he criticizes what others do. He doesn't do it to "win" he does it because the issue bothers him enough to say so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #112
127. I'll repeat~! This is politics not a tea party...the other candidates
have done the same ...are haven't you been paying attention?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
133. Dean is just stating the facts that can't be handled by ones who
puke so easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:04 AM
Original message
I hate to agree with you
because I'm a Dean supporter, but I am really unhappy about his attack on General Clark this morning. I don't think it was intellectually honest either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
51. dang
:wow:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Closer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #17
58. Oh because Pepperbelly
thought SOO much of Dean before right? :eyes:


RIIIGHT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #58
64. While I am accustomed to a lack of acumen in most of your posts ...
your ability to read minds is something new to me.

In fact, Dean was my second choice. Note, in case you didn't as you read that sentence, the past tense usage of the 'be' verb: WAS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #64
75. You don't have a second choice.
You're with Clark until he drops out. Be honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #75
79. by second choice ....
I mean what I said. If my guy had dropped out, I would have supported Dean. But not now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #79
83. Exactly. You're with Clark until he drops out.
If Clark cannot take pointing out *facts* about his past from Democrats, he is going to crumble in the slim chance he gets to Rove.

Dean, in contrast, can absorb a lot of attacks, since he has been through organized hate campaigns before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #83
85. Dean ...
is a punk. Why do I say that? Because he used an intellectually dishonest attack. It's not a matter of whether Clark can handle Dean because there isn't a doubt in my mind. What Dean did was lose my respect, respect that he once had. Now, voting ABB for him would be a bitter pill to swallow. I would but I would have to hold my nose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #85
90. You prefer Bush over Dean?
Perhaps Clark and his supporters are Republicans. :+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #90
94. is your problem in this a ...
reading skills problem or a problem in honesty.

Or were you just making a funny?

I thought that I clearly stated that I would "hold my nose" and vote for ABB, even if Dean is nominted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #94
102. Yes, I was being funny.
Hence, the clown. :p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
97. How is this 'dishonest' isn't Clark dishonest by not being up front about
it.

IMHO, Clark should have been totally upfront about his 'conversion' so others didn't have to bring it to light.

He should have a page dedicated to it on his website. It is important, yet I can support him if he's honest/upfront.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. ok...
Voting in the past for Repugs, praising the Bushco players.

Many of us here have voted for repugs in the past and most democrats in congress praised the Bushco players.

Sorry we all don't pass your Democrat litmus test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Apology accepted. : )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #19
32. I Never Voted R In My Life And I Have Been Voting Since 76.....
but I don't like Dean....He's just plain mean....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #19
36. YOU don't have to pass a Democratic litmus test. HE does.
You're not running for president on the Democratic ticket. Clark is. Perhaps he voted for Clinton and Gore, but if he did, in fact, vote for Gore, what the FUCK was he doing at that Repuke fundraiser 2 years ago not just praising the creeps in *'s cabinet, as well as * and Poppy, but ALSO making little Republican in-jokes about making sure the military vote is counted? That's no fucking Gore supporter. That's no fucking Democrat. That's an opportunist in my book. An opportunist who is probably much more moderate in his views that *, but an opportunist who is still basically a Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfan454 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #19
41. I, for one. have NEVER voted for a repuke.
And I never will to the day I die. Ever !.....Never Ever !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. Good, open minded.
That's the attitude we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
48. He may well have voted for more Republican presidents
than Democrats. We know he voted for Republicans in four elections and Democrats in three. He admits to voting for Nixon, Reagan twice, and Bush 1 and for Clinton twice and Gore. And he praised those people at a Republican fundraiser. He raised money for Hutchinson and Huckabee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #48
73. Where did you get Bush 1.
I am pretty plugged in, but I haven't heard that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
47. He left out the facts that support Clark being a Democrat
Voting for Clinton and Gore, his liberal positions, etc.

The facts seem to support Clark being an "Independent." To take selective facts and try to paint a picture that is untrue is a "lie."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #47
68. How about campaigning for Max Cleland and others.
There's plenty of stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #47
119. Perhaps he should make his run as an Independent then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. Dean gave a great answer on the "flip-flop" charges
that have been thrown at him by the RNC. He said (and I am paraphrasing here) that "when the republicans encounter facts that dispute their theories they try to throw out or ignore the facts (global warming being one example). When I encounter facts that dispute my positions, I reexamine my positions."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malikshah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
76. Stop w/ the Memes, folks
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:18 AM by Malikshah

ON EDIT: Sorry this was meant for the original post on the thread....
mea culpa. It's not meant in response to the post it comes after. :)

When * & Co. take over for 4 more years of hell on earth--I will come back and remind each and every one of you of your fostering of the "flip-flop" "temper" "Republican or Democrat" memes.

They're divisive, pathetic and weakening.

Each of them have been thoroughly discounted by of all things the facts--and only a dunder headed idiot would continue to promote them as sound political discussion.

Shame on each and every one of you -- Wake up!

On a similar line--

The person from the Cook report needs to get her head out of her caboose as well. She spouted off historical precedence re: polls, basically stating that nothing up til now matters in polls--it's only after December that we should look. She uses the past as her basis for thought.

Uh-- We're dealing w/ a different political scenario here folks.

2000 Stolen Election
9/11/01
Pre-emptive war

These facts completely alter the equation--if the political analysts cannot see that then they should be canned.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
24. What time is this on? I'm on Mountain time and don't
want to miss it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #24
44. It's all over the board
I thought I missed it, but just found out it's on at 11:30 Eastern in the Atlanta market.

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #44
66. Thanks, Eloriel.
I think it has been preempted by a football game here (Colorado). I can't find it anywhere, so I'll have to read the transcript later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
31. Is it on NOW?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
33. Dean is divisive and I will now say....
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:01 AM by familydoctor
of all the main candidates, I like Dean the very least.
6 months ago, I thought he was going to be my guy. I
like the underdog. However, he has run a campaign of
negativity bashing other dems and inferring they are
republicans.

I don't trust Dean and I think his "people powered
howard" and rolled up sleeves bit is just an act.

I have tried to refrain from directly running Dean down
but I am sick of his tactics. If people don't like him
enough for who he is, he just has to live with it. Running
everyone else down on the ticket does not help our party.

I hope Clark keeps the high ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. Clark voters aren't going to switch anyway.
People aren't going to Clark because of his detailed educational plan or record on health care. They merely like the stars and are afraid of Bush.

Dean needs to juice up the supporters he already has and get the word out on who Clark really is for those undecided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #38
55. The problem is...
People have been trying to define Clark. Then they see him or meet him and are drawn to him. So go ahead and try to define him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #55
60. Who Cares? Dean is going to win the nomination and defeat Bush Junior.
I see no reason to switch to Clark. All Clark's supporters claim is that Clark has stars and that they are very afraid of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #60
63. Arrogant and wrong...
Go find the Clark taking Dean supporters article and get back to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #63
70. There will be a nice place for Clark in the Dean administration.
You have nothing to worry about. :evilgrin:

Why are Clarkies so touchy? Gephardt is hammering Dean on MTP and we don't see the Deanies going bezerk....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #70
81. Gep is telling the truth. Dean lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poskonig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #81
84. Gephardt can say whatever he wants. The point is:
we don't see the *Dean people* crying all over DU today. That's because we're unstoppable. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #60
69. Your analysis is 'blue sky' at best.
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:13 AM by Pepperbelly
And I outlined the reasons in the post mountainman made about Clark's eventual nomination. While I am not as convinced as mountainman, I do believe that this goes past the 3/2 primaries and Clark will be in an excellent position for those states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #38
56. Thank you for the free psychoanalysis. (It was free, right?)
Quaking in my boots behind Clark (with the other tens of thousands of scared activists that drafted him)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #38
61. That is ridiculous
I switched from Dean to Clark and not because of the stars. I think the will be a huge help in the general and beyond, no doubt, but I switched because I think Clark is more liberal than Dean, more in touch with more different segments of the population, and probably the brightest of the whole lot, although I do think that everyone running on the Dem side is highly intellegent. Clark has spoken about things that concern me and seems more aware of the huge problems that we ordinary Americans face than Dean. Also, and here's a place where the stars do come in, when confronted with intelligence reports, Clark is as capable as anyone in understanding and interpreting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #38
114. would have been a Deanie - am turned off and now for Clark....
I've been seeing more and more things that I don't like about him. I saw his reocrd as governor on the environment in Vermont and I tmade me sick. If you look at his background as Governor in Vermont - it will make you ill.

If you look at some of the things that he's said about welfare recipients and gays - you would think that he was a bigoted right wing Republican. And by the way - he reluctantly signed that bill about gay unions. Don't let him fool you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #114
129. you haven't been a Dean supporter for a month now....according
to you...

And he signed the the Civil Unions Bill...he didn't have to...Dean believed in it. It was the right thing to do. So he did it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #33
43. There's A Graph In Today's NYT
Main Section Page 24


Of all the Dems in Thursday's debate Dean spent the most time bashing other Dems...

He "doesn't play well with others".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #43
121. I must have missed that...
:eyes:

I recall him DEFENDING himself more then anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babzilla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #33
113. is this what you mean by refraining to directly run him down?
Dean Fans, Look Here !!!! Dean Can't Win!!! Here's Why!!!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/duboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=5697&forum=DCForumID22

I know, you were doing it for the good of the party right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #113
122. I am glad you brought that up...
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 12:13 PM by familydoctor
because I apologized for my tone and agressiveness
in that thread as well as some statements I made
briefly following up on it.

However, I have since been treating Dean with kid gloves for
the sake of a unified message here at DU. But no longer, Dean
has misrepresented himself and has crossed the line
too many times. I am glad Gep and Kerry are calling him on it.

It's funny how Dean was saying good things about Clark
right up until Clark ran for the nomination. If Dean
thought Clark was such a Republican, why did he seek
his advice on foreign affairs? Why did he (allegedly)
offer him a position in his as yet to be determined
administration? Why did his campaign staffers infer Clark would
make good VP material?

Here's why.... Clark wasn't/isn't a Republican but now that
Dean is seriously worried, he's gotta scare everybody
and mislead his followers not to jump ship.

I predicted Dean would implode, and this is just the start
of it. I also predicted Dean couldn't beat Bush and you
know what, the polls are showing that. So, if Dean gets
nominated, we will all have to hope and pray that all
the Dems he has alienated and the vast number of "middle
of the roaders" he has alienated will change their mind
and get behind him.

Here's my outright opinion: Dean is dangerous for the party
and seems to be able to say anything to just to get elected.

Some of you can accuse me of "doing Rove's work" for getting
aggressive (again) but I am sick of the BS. I am not going to
stand idly by when Dean infers that his colleagues are Republicans
or Republican-like just to get ahead. What Dean is doing is called divide and conquer. It's all called a good way to lose in 2004
when Dean has no friends and has ran a campaign of negativity
and divisiveness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
128. You are so disingenous....you were mindlessly attacking Dean
for months on this Board...who do you think you are fooling?

And no there's no links ..I didn't save any of your flame baiting on Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
37. A good preview of
what the media has in store for WHOMEVER wins the Democratic nomination. I don't usually watch these things, but I'm home alone and tuned in. The corporate media will do whatever it takes to make the Democrat appear to be a liar and indecisive, they did a better good job of that with Dean (whom I like). If ONLY they would do the same with chimp and his repig minions, don't bet on it. There will be NO chance for the opposition to spell out their agenda which would benefit the People and the Planet, it will be ALL negative ALL the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #37
49. Bob Scheiffer Is One Of The Good Guys....
He's tough on all the players....That's his job....

A DUer posted an e-mail he sent Schieffer for holding Condi Rice's feet to the fire...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #37
57. They did a better job of that with Dean...
because he is a liar and he is indecisive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #57
71. Which one of the candidates
wouldn't the media be able to portray this way. Of all these shows Schieffer is one of the better ones, but can any of us REALLY believe they would subject our naked emperor to this kind of grilling? There will be NO time allowed to our candidates to present their positive agenda, it will ALL be focused on infighting and negativity. I haven't made up my mind of who would receive my support (I do know which one I do NOT like or who are not electable however).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EagleEye Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #57
72. Indecisive?
I'm not sure. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sagan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
46. You Deanies and Clarkies make me want to puke...

You sound like Rove-created spin doctors. Shame on all of you. I like Dean AND I like Clark. But if those two have followers like I see here, then I'm having second thoughts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eileen_d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #46
62. I like Dean and Clark too
It doesn't help for either side to be saying "Liar, Liar."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jawja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #62
77. Thanks for this topic, as
"Face the Nation" comes on at 11:30 in my area.

I look forward to seeing Dean, as he is on my "very short list."

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #46
111. *Applauds*
Thank you for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
80. DEAN is a Republican!!! Have you heard about his environmental
record?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #80
82. Ii heard the Sierra Club...
says it's toxic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #82
89. Do you have a link for this?
I'm curious and want to find out where and when the Sierra Club said this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janekat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #89
116. I'm going to start a thread about this....
I have several articles and links about this issue. I don't want it to get buried in this thread.

I'll warn you - it will make your hair curl....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #80
86. I Don't Think He's A Puke.....
I just think he's mean....

Which is one of the few things in life worse than being a Puke.....


It's the little things about folks that reveal their character....

Before Wes Clark announced his candidacy Howard Dean said Wes Clark was a "good guy" who knows alot about defense...

Now that Wes Clark announced Howard Dean says Wes Clark is a "Republican" who "supported the war up until October...."

"Prosperity conceals character... Adversity reveals it."

Mean people suck...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #86
93. So Dean says Wes Clark is a Republican...
...who supported the war, but also says he's a good man. Thus, Dean is praising a Republican, and you want to hold that against him, when Clark was fundraising and praising Republicans just a few months ago. OMG, whatevah...

I'll admit that I've found the behavior of supporters of some rather tiresome. The "it's my candidates nomination to claim, and everyone else should get the hell outta the way because my guy can do no wrong" attitude is pfftt...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #93
98. He Distorted Clark's Record
Clark has never been in favor of a unilateral invasion....

To suggest otherwise for petty partisan political advantage is calumny....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #98
99. he said he supported it until October right? Which would mean
he had issues about a unilateral attack...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #99
108. Clark Has Always Opposed A Unilateral Attack
He said the decision to attack Iraq without a United Nations mandate was "the greatest strategic blunder in American military history."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #86
95. Isn't he allowed to tell the truth about Clark? How's that mean?
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:55 AM by gully
If it's true, it's true, and WE should know about it.

I missed the interview, but these are noteworthy facts, that most people are not aware of. Granted us DU-ers are, but we are more educated then the average Jane/Joe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
91. VERY Disappointed
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 10:50 AM by DoveTurnedHawk
I have been a staunch defender of Dean, and he has been my #2 choice for quite a while.

No longer. His intellectually dishonest attacks on Clark are disgraceful. I will still vote for Dean if he wins the nomination, but I am incredibly disappointed to discover that someone who I once thought was a genuinely decent man is in fact an everyday, ordinary politician desperate to get elected, just like nearly all the rest.

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #91
92. Check this article out, DTH
http://www.sltrib.com/2003/Sep/09282003/nation_w/96682.asp

"To grow the party, we need to accept people who have just come into the fold as new Democrats. That should be the end of the matter," said Gordon Fischer, the Iowa Democratic chairman. "The only way we are going to be able to succeed is by attracting Republicans and independents to the Democratic banner."
Joe Erwin, chairman of the South Carolina Democratic Party, said he, too, hoped that candidates would not engage in "potentially divisive" attacks on Clark. Most voters in the state's Feb. 3 primary, Erwin predicted, would pay little attention to Clark's Republican past.
"I welcome new Democrats. You don't have to be born into this party," Erwin said. "Now he's committed to the principles of the Democratic Party. There is plenty of room."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #92
101. Good, Sensible Article
Unlike the view of so many purists here.

:thumbsup:

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #91
103. What was dishonest? I ask again....
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
115. Sincere and free advice.
The Dean pugnacity can be beneficial for his campaign, but only when used in moderation and the right context. I think he needs to be more careful and controlled with it.

Schieffer was tough with his grilling of Dean. I was not comfortable or impressed with the way Dean handled this, and I think it can be a problem for him in successfully getting his message across to the general audience. And he needs to succeed at getting his message across because his personality and fiesty jabbbing at aWol will only get him so far.

I know all the candidates are busier than I can imagine with their campaigns. But Dean really needs to devote some time to actually practicing his response to hostile questioning, with expert coaching and feedback. Just like a doctor needs over time to study, train and learn new procedures and techniques.

From my armchair, he seems to have a Mike Tyson button that reporters and debaters have no trouble punching, and rarely is that response effective, especially on tv. He needs to work on more of a judo, or akido response. Go to the tapes, study Clinton, Madeline Albright, Colin Powell, Bill Richardson, even Trent Lott etc. He must learn to handle the attacks more smoothly and productively. Then when the rare, appropriate occasion presents itself, firing off the big guns is much more effective. This is not self-betrayal or changing who you are. It's growing to meet the challenges, changing the theory based on new facts.

I want Dean to do as well as he can, and he obviously has been doing pretty good already. But there is a long road ahead. aWol looks weak and vulnerable now, but next fall he conceivably could be stronger (?), and we need to send our best, at their best, against him. Dean needs to practice this hard now so he can fight at his best if he gets the nod.

Now, all the above is directed at style, not so much content. I must say I was extremely pissed and surprised at the content of his attacks on Clark, and really think they were beneath Dean, or at least my impression of Dean so far. Clark is my top choice now, based on my perception of his chances to topple aWol, and his positions and vision for the future. Dean is way ahead as my second choice now, and I would hate to see him decline in that position due to poor interview technique or uncalled for cheapshots at any dem competitors.

I just watched Powell with Judy Woodruff. He handled her perfectly, and refused to bash Clark despite repeated egging on. Too bad he employs his skills in service to the dark side. Our guys need to hone such skills and use them in the fight for the good.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #115
131. Oh yeah! The murdering, killling, lying, colin powell is good
with judy judy judy and this is great ..where as Dean doesn't suffer fools and is honest in his reaction to the likes of fu=king bob schieffer and Dean should go to school on it.

I'll Dean anytime, anywhere, any place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC