Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Global SAVE - Global Struggle Against Violent Extremism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 10:50 AM
Original message
Global SAVE - Global Struggle Against Violent Extremism
So that's the new motto.

It seemed like a rather and mouthful - until you think about the acronym. :argh:

They are so insane.


Slate had an article about it last week:

"...Look at the first letters of Global War on Terrorism. GWOT. What does that mean; how is it pronounced? Gwot? Too frivolously rowdy, like a fight scene in a Marvel comic book (Bam! Pfooff! Gwot!). Gee-wot? Sounds like a garbled question (Gee what?).

Then look at Global Struggle Against Violent Extremism. Its acronym is GSAVE—i.e., gee-save. We're out to save the world, see, not wage war on it. Or, as national security adviser Stephen Hadley puts it in the Times piece, "We need to dispute both the gloomy vision and offer a positive alternative."

Does Hadley, and do all our other top officials, really believe this nonsense? Are they so enraptured with PR that they think a slogan and a strategy are the same thing and that retooling the one will transform the other? Have we lapsed into the banality of the mid-'70s, when President Gerald Ford tried to beat back 20-percent price hikes by urging Americans to wear gigantic lapel pins that read "WIN"—for Whip Inflation Now?

The Times notes, midway into the story, that the "language shifts" come at a time when Karen Hughes, one of President Bush's most trusted advisers, is about to take over the State Department's office of "public diplomacy." If changing GWOT to GSAVE is a sign of campaigns to come, we are in sorrier shape than anyone might previously have imagined."

http://slate.msn.com/id/2123412/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, a jihad by any other name ...
... (like "crusade") smells the same, I guess. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. It's interesting to me
because I've had fundys try to convince me that we are not fighting in the name of religion - like the "Muslims" do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. I like how they had to add "Violent Extremism" instead of just "Extremism"
Lest they punk Goldwater's old rant from the 1964 convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. kinda like the frame they tired to implant b4: Homicide bombers-asshats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. And to save the world we will blow up most of it!
We simply started with Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. I thought it was Religious Extremism
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. NO, no, no
Bush is supporting Religious Extremism. All the better to create enemies and increase the military. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Don't it just piss you off?
1820 dead American soldiers and the bushco's change the name of the game. Somebody ought to impeach the whole crew.

Imminently!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. What's been more extreme than 'Shock and Awe', lately?
I believe 100,000 civilians were killed in that one.
And let us not forget Falluja.

Sickening hypocrites.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-03-05 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
10. ...
:banghead:

:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC