Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is any other country pro-Israel?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 06:57 PM
Original message
Is any other country pro-Israel?

?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. India is becoming fairly pro-Israel
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/3092726.stm

The Axis of Sharon - USA-India-Israel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. What about the Indian people?
Who do they sympathize with in the I/P conflict?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screaming_meme Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Because they're at war with Muslim militiants, too
Plus the defense and technology capabilities Israel exports. They specialize in modernizing the avionics of old Soviet fighters. India used to be a major arms client of the USSR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. That isn't it IMO
This is to contain Pakistan IMO. Israel realizes that if fundies take over Pakistan they are in trouble. India accepts the aid because Israel has more advanced weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sushi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
45. It's politics
They have one thing in common. They're fighting the same enemy. Muslims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Marshal Islands.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Aren't you the guy who implied that Arabs smell?
In the foreign affairs forum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. ME?
No, that wasn't me. That was Herschel.

I'm quite pro-Palestinian, actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Ok
I'm neutral on the issue. I believe we should start negotiations now but not finalize an agreement until the terrorism stops. A Palestinian state, with no military, should be created IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Why demilitarized?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. demilitarized for a generation at least
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 07:17 PM by _Jumper_
Palestinian children have been taught that killing Jews is heroic, that Jews are evil, through the media, school system, and culture. That hatred will not evaporate if they get a state. There needs to be timeout where that hatred is allowed to fade away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. They have?
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 07:28 PM by Darranar
That claim, IMO, has been debunked many times. The environmental factors that contribute to hatred of Israel has a lot more to do with brutality and oppression by the Israelis then with teaching. It's the same way in isarel. Irrational hatred of the Palestinians is based not on teaching, but on the fear of the suicide bombings and devestating strikes against innocent people.

Ending the occupation, dismantling the settlements, and giving a state to the palestinains will evaporate quite a bit of their hatred - which will in turn stop terrorism, which will end Israeli fear and hatred and stop them from occupying the area ever again. Of course, that works alternatively with a halt to Palestinain terrorism. It isn't a one-sided conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I'll go to the I/P forum and read more on the issue
You know more than I do about this so I defer to your theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loyal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. In my opinion,
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 07:14 PM by Loyal
being pro-Palestinian isn't any better than being pro-Israel. An objective view is necessary for such a complex conflict, and you cannot provide it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Go down to I/P...
and see my posts.

The thing is that I'm both - pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian, that is. The atrocities committed by both sides must be seen as that - atrocities. It must be realized that extremist and indiscriminate tactics by both sides not only are immoral, but also accomplish nothing whatseover for their respective causes.

I support an objective position on this conflict. Like you, I think it is neccesary for resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Will do
I don't visit that forum regularly but I'll take a look today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loyal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. I have
And it seems that you never condemn suicide bombings, but that you silently justify them because of the atrocities that Israel commits. So I am not convinced of your objectivity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Then you haven't read them enough...
I have condemned suicide bombings befoe, and I will do so again, right now:

Suicide bombings are immoral and despicable acts of terrorism against israeli civilians. They MUST stop in order for there to be true peace.

And there's no ifs, ands, or buts to that.

Happy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loyal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Yes, and for the record,
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 07:45 PM by Loyal
I condemn Israeli incursions that go farther and farther into sovereign land.

Happy? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Yah, I'm happy.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sushi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
46. I've walked past
many Arabs in the Middle East, and smell incense (a lot of women), and talcum powder or perfume (a lot of men!).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Turkey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screaming_meme Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Apartheid South Africa was a close ally of Israel
They had a lot of defense/nuclear links. France used to be an ally of Israel's a long, long time ago. I think the USSR was in the very beginning; Zionism had a very collectivist or socialist philosophies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Many countries are pro-Israel, only US funds sharon's war crimes

Over a fifth of the households in Israel don't have enough food.

Sharon takes all the tax money the bush regime gives him and spends it to kil Palestinians.

While many countries like the Israeli people, only the US supports crimes against humanity, including torture, human shields and the starvation of both Israeli and Palestinian children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Which ones?
What I meant was does any other country favor the Israelis over the Palestinians?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Why Is It A Either/Or Proposition?
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. Few nations are 50-50 on anything
There has to be an iota of preference for one side in a large group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Only the US values Israeli lives over Palestinian lives

Most earth residents think Palestinian lives are just as valuable.

This makes the sharon and bush regimes very angry. They consider such people to be terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Germany used to be.
Out of guilt.

But they don't want to sanction Sharon's continuous war crimes any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Of the real countries in the world, we're it.
Australia will sometimes vote with them in the U.N., as will Canada.

In a way though, it depends on how you define 'pro-Israel.' Lots of countries have trade with Israel, and most countries are not innately hostile to Israel (contrary to what some of Israel's apologists claim); however some of Israel's policies and behaviors make it a difficult country to 'support.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I'll define it
I define pro-Israel or pro-Palestinian as favoring one side over the other.

Australia? Why?

Doesn't Canada now try a balancing act since it has twice as many Muslims as Jews, but Jews have more money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Even the terms 'pro-Israel' and 'pro-Palestinain'
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 07:35 PM by BillyBunter
are probably insufficient, although I have a better idea what you mean now.

If you mean how many countries in the world take Israel's side in what is called the 'Israel-Palestinian dispute,' then we really are the only one.

As to why Australia does, I've never really looked at it much. I suspect it has to do with their alliance with the U.S., and the same is true with Canada. The reason Marshall Islands supports Israel is basically because we tell them to, for example; it would suprise me little if Australia sometimes went along with the U.S. as part of some kind of quid pro quo arrangement. I'm unfortunately not well-versed in Australian politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Marshall Islands?
Is it true that it is pro-Israel? I thought Darraner was just being facetious when he said that.

1% of Canadians are Jewish. Prior to the past 15-20 years there were virtually no Muslims there. That explains their pro-Israel stance in the past. Now Muslims make up 2% of the population but Jews have more money and affluence so the government in recent years has tried an even-handed approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Yah, they do...
they joined our great country in voting against the resolution to stop Israel from killing Arafat. As mentioned above, basically because the US told them to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. LOL
Who else voted against that resolution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Marituania, (sp?) I think...
and no one else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Thanks
BTW, it is spelled Mauritania. That is interesting since it is a 100% Muslim country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Well, as it turns out...
Edited on Sun Sep-28-03 07:42 PM by Darranar
I was completely wrong. It wasn't Mauritania, it was Micronesia. Sorry for the error.

In case you're interested, here's the voting on the Arafat resolution:

In favour: Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Chad, Chile, China, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Ecuador, Egypt, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gambia, Germany, Greece, Grenada, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Thailand, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen.



Against: Federated States of Micronesia, Israel, Marshall Islands, United States.



Abstain: Australia, Cameroon, Canada, Colombia, Fiji, Guatemala, Honduras, Kenya, Nauru, Nicaragua, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Tonga, Tuvalu.



Absent: Afghanistan, Bahamas, Bhutan, Burundi, Central African Republic, Comoros, Costa Rica, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Gabon, Georgia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Iraq, Kiribati, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mongolia, Niger, Palau, Republic of Moldova, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Sao Tome and Principe, Seychelles, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Tajikistan, Timor-Leste, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Thanks!
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
40. Did you really say that?
Nice stereotype.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. That is a fact
Most Canadian Muslims are 1st or 2nd generation immigrants with little political power and aren't very wealthy. Canadian Jews are wealthier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sushi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
48. As far as I know
Australia is even-handed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. They abstained on the Arafat resolution...
I'm not sure I'd call that evenhanded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmeriCanadian Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. Canada is
... Been supporting them as long as the US has
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Is that still the case?
I've read that due to the rise in the Muslim population they have tried to be even-handed in recent years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. El Salvador and Costa Rica both have their embassies in Jerusalem...
to the dismay of arab countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddleoftheroad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. Since that is the capital
That's where the embassies belong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. It is a disputed capital
Would you support China moving its capital to Tibet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. that's not what we are discussing...
most other countries have it in Tel Aviv. It is certainly an indicator that both countries support Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GabysPoppy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
49. I am locking this thread
The majority of posts in this thread are I/P content. I do not want to just move it to that forum because it will be locked per I/P rules.

You may repost by linking it to a current news article and/or a current editorial in the I/P forum and continue the discussion.


GabysPoppy
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC