Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judith Miller

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LeftyElvis Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:17 AM
Original message
Judith Miller
Anyone know why she is still is jail. I mean, we know who her leaker was; KKKarl Rove. What's the deal? Were there more leaks in the bush sinking ship?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, we're not sure Rove was the leaker.
He permitted Cooper to tell his name. Miller's source is different, or, perhaps, she is the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pk_du Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:26 AM
Original message
I agree Millers source could be different OR
- The communication from Rove to her is more damning that that between Rove/Cooper


BUT - "she" cannot be "the source"..... she was never entitled to have the info, som whoever told her was her source ( possibly Libby if not Rove)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. We know there was more than one
And there is an interesting quirk to treason and other laws; there have to be TWO witnesses.

Fitzgerald appears to be looking at a conspiracy, and as such needs all the witnesses he can get.

And besides, she deserves it for her Chalabi and DoD stenography pre-war. And after war too. That one where she reported a farmer was pointing to the ground and how that confirmed that there were WMD in Iraq was a real howler.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. because she's protecting criminals
its just a coincidence that she's a warmongering, lying piece of shit that should rot in jail for decades.

kinda like getting Capone for tax fraud, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hi LeftyElvis!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. She's still in jail because she's still contemptible
I mean, she's still in contempt of court for not complying with the judge's order that she name her source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. welcomne to du, LeftyElvis...
:hi: but then it's all = poor Judith, who knew 'journalists' were so principled :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-05 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. We'll find out...
eventually. I hope, anyway. Right now it's all guesswork.

This investigation is the tightest one in memory-- absolutely no leaks or hints at what's going on from the investigators. A lot different from Starr and his PR department.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC