Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An email to my Republican Mom

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 09:59 AM
Original message
An email to my Republican Mom
I sent her this link from an article I wrote yesterday:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=109&topic_id=22145&mesg_id=22145
She responded below.
My dear Mom is a diehard Repub but she does have a bit of an open mind and I know her heart is in the right place. I hope my response helps her "see" a bit more.


-----------------------



Mom:
Very literate and well thought out. Can't be sure I would agree with the conclusion that we need "more government" but do agree with you re: the media being controlled. I'm just not ready to let government run anymore of my life than is already done.


Me
I don't recall suggesting "more" government. In fact the only President to "shrink" government, in recent history, was Clinton.
The point of my article was to first point out the unfounded "liberal medial" label and secondly to suggest that we need a shift of our Government and media away from "Corporate control" to "Citizen control", hence the call for more involvement by the populace, young and old.
A common argument is that journalists are liberal. Well research polls do not make or break a journalist's career and they can answer anonymously without fear of retribution. And furthermore the journalists do not decide on editorial content. That is done by editors who are directed by publishers/program directors/owners etc. That group is far to the right. Remember when Reagan trashed the "Fairness Doctrine" in the '80's? That was the beginning of the end of objective, fair journalism in this country. In all fairness, Clinton signed the "Telecom Act" which allowed for corporate monopolies to further take place, in the media market, killing competition. We now have about 6 mega-corporations owning all of our print, TV, and radio.

Big money controls Washington and also the message, being "the media".
Big oil and defense contractors control them all. Big oil and defense contractor interests are what the current administration's cabinet is made up of. And as far as "more power" is concerned, the "Patriot Act" gives the government more power than any other piece of legislation in our history. As it stands now, government officials can enter your home without your knowledge, no search warrant, when you are gone, and leave without ever notifying you. Some say, "that's fine, I have nothing to hide". One big problem with that is our government should be of the people, by the people, and for the people. If say someone disagreed with the direction of the government they would have no ability to be secure in their quest to peacefully change the government. Computers, papers, anything could be taken at anytime without a warrant. That is how the law is set up today.

I want a government that:

Protects, instead of weakens, environmental oversight.
Protects us from Insurance corporations running roughshod over our health care.
Looks as health care as a duty to all it's citizens rather that a privilege for those that can afford it.
Protects our ports, railways, and homeland instead of overseas follies.
Does not invade other countries but instead takes care of it's own citizens.
Does not give tax rewards for stationing businesses overseas.
Does not pass Energy Bills written by oil companies making obscene profits and at the same time receiving $12,000,000,000 in tax breaks.
Understands the importance of an independent media and not the paid off type as in cases like Armstrong Williams.
Does not exclude it's citizens, based on bumper stickers, from Presidential gatherings as happened during the SS tou, in Colorado.
Stops the obscene trade deficit with China instead of rewarding it.
Instead of gutting the Farm Bill and passing CAFTA, actually looks out for our farmers instead of the big agri-business interests.
and on and on...

The mainstream news is far more interested in bringing us stories on runaway blondes, god, guns, and gays when the real stories are:
Healthcare
Economy
Environment
Iraq
The theft of democracy via the privatized, corporate controlled, electronic vote counting system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Under Chimpy the government has actually increased. Not to mention
all you said is that you want a government is to do what it is supposed to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. what she said...
and please (original poster) let us know how your mother responds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks...I will. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kudos to your 'thinking Republican' Mom
Some of us don't even have that. My Mom is a Faux-News-watching, liberals-are-destroying-this-country, can't-seem-to-think-for-herself Repub. It's completely devastating to find out your parents are blind and ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well
My Mom does say FAUX is the only "balanced" news out there but she is open minded in other areas. She is in favor of industrial hemp legalization for instance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Well good for her
That's something at least.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. That's a really bad idea actually. It would put the industry in the hands
of companies like Marlboro, Monsanto and big pharma. The last thing we need is big business turning a relatively harmless organic into some kind of highly addictive frankenweed.

Decriminalize, don't legalize. If you want to smoke it grow your own. I don't smoke it, never have but I certainly don't have a problem with those who would engage in responsible recreational use and I CANNOT for the life of me figure how ANYONE could be against allowing those who would benefit medically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Some confusion here
Industrial Hemp is an altogether different animal than medicinal/recreational use.

Check my sig line below>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Gotcha
I guess I drove by your post at about 87mph, I'll try to slow down a little and pay better attention.

Industrial hemp is something we should have been pushing DECADES ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. 10-4 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. If this e-mail doesn't wake her up, nothing will! Recomended Greatest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. My Mom's response
I couldn't possibly agree more with your list under "I want a government that......" I took wrongly your original phrase "what we need is a stronger government...." All in all we don't disagree as much as you might think. Keep on keepin' on. Love, Mother

That my friends, is progress!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mconvente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. bravo!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. A small shift in thought...
Edited on Sun Aug-07-05 03:59 PM by SHRED
but an important one.

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Hey SHRED
a HUGE :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Thanks salin!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-07-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. liberals and conservatives differ in WHERE the government's powers
should lie and be used: that's the closest the two opposing sides come to--much like particles and antiparticles, there's a significant similarity under the essential and intergral--world-shattering, indeed--difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC