Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Marie Cocco: Bush's oilmen got it all wrong in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 08:57 AM
Original message
Marie Cocco: Bush's oilmen got it all wrong in Iraq
http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-opcoc094376423aug09,0,312665.column?coll=ny-viewpoints-headlines

Bush's oilmen got it all wrong in Iraq

Marie Cocco 8/8/05

No oil for blood.

<snip>

"Iraq has oil," Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld told Fortune magazine in 2002, discussing the potential cost of an Iraq invasion and how it would be met. "They have financial resources."

Paul Wolfowitz, formerly Rumsfeld's deputy, was bolder: "The oil revenues of that country could bring in between $50 and $100 billion over the course of the next two or three years," he told Congress as the war began. "We're dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction."

Iraq exported 1.6 million barrels per day in July, according to the oil ministry, at least half a million barrels a day less than in the waning months of Saddam Hussein's regime. Hours-long lines at gas stations are a constant of daily life, and the country must import gasoline.

<snip>

How did an administration overflowing with oilmen get it all so wrong?

The story line is tiresome. It parallels the warnings about weapons of mass destruction. It tracks with the delusional prediction about being greeted as liberators, and the fantasy about how only a few "dead-enders" continued to fight after our troops took Baghdad.

<snip>

http://www.newsday.com/news/opinion/ny-opcoc094376423aug09,0,312665.column?coll=ny-viewpoints-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. "The story line is tiresome." Magnificent line, great summary.
With everything else they are, ultimately * and the Neocons are "tiresome" small minded, and incompetent. I'd hate to think what the implications could have been of a quick victory, incredibly efficient transition, and skillful installation of a "rubber stamp" government. Hell, we'd be training Iraq to conquer other Arab states.

But, no, they just can't do it. They have well earned performance anxiety.

Great post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. the piece is a pretty good parallel to this one from DU last week
The Enemy of my Enemy is my Enemy
August 3, 2005
By Bucky Rea
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. I remember the comment...
... from a few months after Bush announced "mission accomplished" from one of the State Dept.'s experts on nation-building. He'd asked around about why he hadn't been consulted before the war began. Someone from the White House told him, "It's all done. The President spent an hour on it."

`Nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bush was a failed oilman so it's no wonder they got Iraqi oil wrong too
Edited on Tue Aug-09-05 09:18 AM by wishlist
Bush couldn't stand for Saddam to have control of that much oil.

Good points about failure of Iraq oil to pay for the expenses of reconstruction:

"The president's men saw what they wished to see - the 115 billion barrels of oil reserves beneath the desert. They were blind to what was really there: an oil industry decimated by more than a decade of economic sanctions, with technological decay and even geological deterioration of the fields already gnawing at it.

The rash predictions about Iraqi oil paying for the American conquest of Iraq were always suspect, part of the marketing campaign that sold the war. "The statement in and of itself always struck me as part of the spin that this was going to be a clean, simple, fairly cost-free operation," a veteran adviser to Western governments in Baghdad told me in an interview.

Just as UN weapons inspectors, once allowed back into Iraq, correctly surmised that there were no weapons of mass destruction, so, too, did oil industry inspectors for the United Nations accurately assess the dire condition of Iraq's oil industry. In 1998 a UN report found it in a lamentable state. The conclusion was confirmed in 2000 and again in 2001. "Basically being held together with chewing gum," is how the Western expert described it. "At the time this was dismissed by the United States as just another example of how the UN had been taken in by the Iraqis."

The U.S. Energy Information Administration concedes the point. The report for the United Nations "now appears to have been largely accurate," the agency says in its latest analysis of Iraq's oil situation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I guess they had bad intelligence. Better find someone to blame.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC