Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush shuns science - Austin American Statesmen editorial

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DanCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 12:39 PM
Original message
Bush shuns science - Austin American Statesmen editorial
EDITORIAL
Watching from sidelines as science marches on
EDITORIAL BOARD
AUSTIN AMERICAN STATESMAN

Monday, August 08, 2005

Reports last week that a South Korean scientist had successfully
cloned a dog underlined a fact about biological research: We can
debate the morality of such issues as cloning and stem cells as long
as we wish, but science will not wait on the outcome. While we in
the United States talk, someone in the world acts.In his first year as president, George W. Bush set a national policy of not using federal funds to pay for research on human embryonic stem cells, except for the few lines already under study. The effect was to sharply curtail such research in the United States. The moral objection to such research was that stem cells — which can
grow into any kind of body tissue — are derived from a human embryo,
when it is about five days old and has about 100 cells. The embryo
dies in the process. Sounds horrible until you consider that such
embryos would be destroyed anyway. Still, because the embryo is
human in origin, religious and some other conservatives regard its
death as an immoral killing.

But the potential benefit of stem cell research is great. Scientists have high hopes that medicines and treatments derived from embryonic stem cell research could cure or reduce the effects of diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, or help people replace damaged internal organs or spinal cords. And it's not just
scientists who are excited by such possibilities, but the victims of
disease and injury and their families.Some hope to reap the benefits of stem cells but avoid the moral problem by using stem cells derived from adults. But scientists don't know yet, without doing the research, whether adult cells can be as effective as stem cells from embryos. The Texas House has approved a measure that includes $41.1 million for a medical research facility at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. The school has promised to focus — for now — only on adult human and animal stem cell experiments.
However, there's no promise to never conduct embryonic stem cell
research. The bill awaits action in the Senate. Any state or nation that shuns cutting-edge biological research on such things as stem cells risks losing substantial intellectual capital. While the federal government has restricted funding for embryonic stem cell research, California voters last year approved a $3 billion bond issue to support research with no such limitation. Texas now seems torn between its religious conservatives and its devotion to economic growth. The U.S. House has passed a bill to allow federally funded stem cell research on an estimated 400,000 embryos marked for disposal by fertility clinics.On July 30, Sen. Bill Frist, the U.S. Senate Republican majority leader and a heart transplant surgeon, upset many in his party and religious conservatives by announcing he would support expanded federal support for embryonic stem cell research.

"Embryonic stem cells have specific properties that make them
uniquely powerful and deserving of special attention in the realm of
medical science," Frist said. With Congress in recess, the Senate cannot consider the stem cell bill until at least September. The Senate should approve it. The White House has threatened a veto.
The president should reconsider, weighing not just the moral status
of embryos, which feel and know nothing, but the pain and suffering
of those with diseases and injuries. And one more question the president should consider: If scientists carrying out embryonic stem research overseas or even under state sponsorship here find a cure for a disease, or a way to grow new organs or repair damaged spinal cords, will he attempt to block Americans from using them on the grounds that they were immorally discovered? Americans wouldn't stand for that.If we're going to use treatments discovered from embryonic stem cell research, what is achieved by shunning the work required to find them?


Ellen Arnold

Jim Arnold & Associates

512 477-4232
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC