Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHY DID HILLARY CLINTON OPPOSE CAFTA?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 09:29 PM
Original message
WHY DID HILLARY CLINTON OPPOSE CAFTA?
I am surprised and confused that Senator Clinton opposed CAFTA. I am glad she did but the Clinton's have historically been pro free trade. Even Jimmy Carter supported CAFTA. Do you think this was all because of 08 and Hillaryt rying to keep friends on both the left and the centrist wing of our party? I have read a few articles stating that CAFTA would actually help the farmers in NY so I am just having trouble understanding why Hillary- a politicians politician would oppose it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hill is to the left of Bill- wants environment/labor law rules in treaties
Bill's comment was that he wished she had voted to approve CAFTA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. well good for her then
Edited on Tue Aug-09-05 10:25 PM by BayCityProgressive
I had heard rumors before that her and Bill also got into a big fight over the 96 welfare reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I have no inside info on that - but Hill fought Bill in 93 as she pushed
for single payer national health

We - the insurance folks cutting checks to our lobbyist crowd - were quite proud of the way we stopped her - appealing to Bill's ego and saying we would guarantee passage as long as he did not go single payer

As in 73 with Nixon, insurance company lies stopped single payer Health in the US despite a President that was ready for it.

Of course it helped the insurance position to be able to control the spin in the media.

But what is the point of rich folks running things if they do not help each other?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I thought she was to the right of Bill
to hear folks here talk about it.

She was a Goldwater Repub and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. She was a Goldwater GOPer - but check out her conversion to the good
side while at Wellesley and at Law school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Singular73 Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Because they know the American worker won't stay competitive
if they are making garments in South Carolina.

It sucks, but its the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Neocon free trade is not all there is to free trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mourningdove92 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Just a wild guess here, but I would say that she opposed it
because she believes it is bad for the county.

that works for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. 95% of US citizens opposed CAFTA; 95% of reps should have too
Explaining this anomaly will not reflect kindly on most of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. 95%? I'd wager that not even 95% have heard of it,
let alone have a position for or against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-05 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. 95% of respondents to polls were against it
Self-selection issues? Maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. voted against but did not campain against CAFTA?
Interesting.

Btw if you read certain articles, you'd think CAFTA is good for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC