Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hour 20 minutes for Rush to talk about Wilson problem.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
slater71 Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 12:36 PM
Original message
Hour 20 minutes for Rush to talk about Wilson problem.
He only mentioned it and went to break. Then a caller asked him why it took him so long to talk about it and why wouldn`t he call for a special prosecuter. He blew him off saying that it was to early and no one is trying to stop Ashcroft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Almmost goes without saying
Edited on Mon Sep-29-03 12:42 PM by ewagner
If it were a Democratic Administratin that's ALL he would have talked about the 1 hour and 20 mins.

Can't the dittoheads get their mind around the hypocrisy of this guy?

on edit: Another shinning example of just how "patriotic" this SOB is. He should be concerned about American security no matter what!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evil_Dewers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't listen to Rush.
You aren't missing a thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Questions Rush forgot to answer re Wilson and Whitehouse
From the ABCnote:

"Has President Bush made clear to the White House staff that only total cooperation with the investigation will be tolerated? If not, why not?

Has he insisted that every senior staff member sign a statement with legal authority that they are not the leaker and that they will identify to the White House legal counsel who is?

Has Bush required that all sign a letter relinquishing journalists from protecting those two sources? Has Bush said that those involved in this crime will be immediately fired? If not, why not?

Has Albert Gonzalez distributed a letter to White House employees telling them to preserve documents, logs, records? If not, why not?

Has Andy Card named someone on his staff to organize compliance? If not, why not?

White House officials who might have legal or political exposure on this are going to have to decide whether to hire lawyers or not, and the White House counsel's office is going to have to decide what legal help they can and should provide to officials if and when the DOJ wants to talk to them.

That means that the '90s practice of every Washington bureau of calling members of the bar to see who has hired whom is about to heat back up. The first one to report someone hiring a criminal lawyer wins a prize, as does the first person who develops that lawyer as a source on all this.

A reminder that students of recusal politics will have to consider the Rove-Ashcroft history"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
10digits Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. I liked Rush better,
when he was advising the Dean campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-03 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. nm <nt>
Edited on Mon Sep-29-03 03:17 PM by tkmorris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC