Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who would be a better nominee Bobby Kennedy or Tom Vilsack?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:41 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who would be a better nominee Bobby Kennedy or Tom Vilsack?
I don't mean Bobby Kennedy Jr., I mean Bobby Kennedy, the guy who would've been elected President in 1968 had he not been assassinated. I posted this a few weeks ago and got little response so I figured I'd try it again.

My point: The idea that a Governor is ALWAYS better than a Senator is complete bullshit. As far as I'm concerned somebody who has charisma and vision beats the hell out of somebody who is dull and has no vision, no matter what position they have previously held.

But for the hell of it, let's see who DU says would be the better nominee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. haha you said Sack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. personally I am sick of dumbass blank-slate governors
"washington outsider" could mean they are too stupid to know how to get things done.

but maybe that's just me. . . .and granted I am in a terrrrrrrrible mood today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. There's no such thing as a "Washington outsider" today
The last "Washington Outsider" elected President was Jimmy Carter. Reagan, Clinton, and certainly Bush were already connected in Washington before they ran for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Maybe we need somebody who isn't an officeholder at all..
Why not start looking at the ranks of activist leaders, or organizers of progressive causes?

(On the specific question in the thread, RFK would be the better choice. While he was still breathing, of course.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree - in 2008 there are still likely to be huge foreign problems
Bill Clinton is widely conceded to be one of the brightest people of his generation - but in the first term he had problems dealing with military and foreign policy issues that his primary opponent Bob Kerrey might not have had.

Clinton was lucky that he was President in a relatively tranquil time period. Kerrey using his own knowledge would likely have supported efforts to clamp down on terrorist bank and communications as recommended by John Kerry. Although Clinton was more aggressive than the pre-911 Bush was on terrorism, I think Kerrey's work on the intelligence committee would have let him intelligently fight these issues from the momment he took office - leading to a much weakened Al Queida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-11-05 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC