spooked
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-29-03 05:35 PM
Original message |
If they're already denying Rove did it, it must have been him!! |
|
This is going to be fun!! http://www.reuters.com/printerFriendlyPopup.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=3525621WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House denied on Monday that President Bush's top political adviser, Karl Rove, was behind a leak of secret information apparently aimed at discrediting a vocal critic of pre-war intelligence on Iraq.
|
Wetzelbill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-29-03 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
1. the moment that story broke the first two people I thought of were |
|
Rove and Cheney. The Wilson affair has those guys written all over it, whether they ever get nailed or not, one or both were involved somehow. Bet on that.
|
boxster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-29-03 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Yes, let's not ignore Cheney in all of this. It's very possible |
|
he's the one or at least involved.
I'm just trying to figure out how he would profit from it....
|
gristy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-29-03 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |
2. They're denying it because Bush is reported to have asked him if he did |
|
it, and KKKarl said no, it wasn't him. Apparently that was good enough for the shrub, and it ought to be good enough for us, huh? :eyes:
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-29-03 05:53 PM
Response to Original message |
LittleApple81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-29-03 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I am sorry, because you cannot choose the way you look |
|
but all these misadministration blooddrinkers look scary, mean, an awful. I have a theory that as you age, your face takes characteristics that reflect your character. If you frown a lot, or sneer a lot, or hate a lot, your features tend to get hardened into those expressions.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:47 PM
Response to Original message |