Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will our senators invade Iran?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KarenInMA Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:06 PM
Original message
Will our senators invade Iran?
Let's be honest, Bush can't do it without congressional approval. Our senators gave him a pass on Iraq, and now many of them are claiming that they, "didn't know" (which is funny, because I remember many people who AREN'T senators who knew this war was wrong).

Will the senators and congresspeople make the same mistake twice? Many of them are up for reelection soon.

It will be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes he can. He bombed Iraq before the actual war without approval.
AND he has control of the Senate and Congress anyway and as things stand now, no one has yet to pick country over party. In other words, he has the consent of the majority of the Senate and Congress regardless of what the Democrats want.
AND if we vote on electronic machines in 2006, it will only continue.

Syria's next...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. but if he bombs Iran, he will put our troops in immenent danger
from their Shiite brothers in Iraq

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KarenInMA Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hey doesn't care about the troops. His ecconomic
policies ensure that there will always be more cannon fodder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. if he bombed Iran, the economy would tank
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KarenInMA Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. and more people would have to join the army...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
titoresque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. not join
draft! There would be a draft!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
23. eh? he'll put us in danger from retaliation from the SCO
Not to mention the nuclear false flag he'll use as a pretext.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. actually the bombing was justified because they said iraq
violated the first gulf war peace agreement

They would have an issue not going through Congress with Iran

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. He already has approval
He was given blanket approval after 9/11. He doesn't need Congressional approval any longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. not true
that was ONLY for Iraq that they gave him the authority, not anything else

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Incitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Can you be more specific?
Bush can send in the troops without a vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KarenInMA Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. He doesn't have a "Tonkin Gulf" type blank check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Immediately following 9/11 he was given the power to attack any nation
Edited on Sat Aug-13-05 11:31 PM by Walt Starr
he deemed aided terrorists.

He has a blank check. He did not even need the IWR to attack Iraq, only the claim of terrorist support.

The IWR gave him even more sweeping power to invade any nation any time.

His check is blank. The Congress signed over their authority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Correct, Walt!
When authorizing the ground invasion of Iraq, Congress gave Dubya blanket approval to invade anywhere, anytime. To get that changed, Congress would have to initiate legislation, and pass it by a veto-proof majority.

I still remember the impassioned speach Senator Byrd made on the Senate floor, begging his fellow Senators to come to their senses and vote against the legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:18 PM
Original message
He can get away with bombing, but an invasion is out of the question
Congress would never approve an invasion - not if the Repukes want to have any power in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Incitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bombing might be enough to start the war.
Edited on Sat Aug-13-05 11:24 PM by Incitatus
Depending on how Iran retaliates, Congress might vote for war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Perhaps, but he's walking on thin ice if you ask me
Takin' it to the streets will be alive and well in America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Congress is in recess now and won't be back until early September.
There are some hints that things are coming to a head in August, and that is when the attack by the US or by Israel with US support would take place. Pre-emptive strikes are now official US strategy, and an attack during the recess would bypass "obstruction" by the Congress. They took the blatantly unconstitutional step of "giving" the president the power to declare war, so they can't stop him when/if he does - especially if they are out of town and not meeting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. they will start the wro and try to stop before the war powers
act REQUIRE congressional aproval
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. Congress never actually gave him permission to go to war, did
they? Did Congress ever actually declare war? Only Congress has the authority to declare war, right? I guess bush can do what he wants? He has up to this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. It's not just Bush
Congress effectively ceded it's jurisdiction over commitment to war with the War Powers Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. But was war actually ever declared by Congress?
The War Powers Act gave bush the power to declare war? So Congress gave up their power? Is that permanent? Apparently I am confused here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
17. Nah...they'll just send others to fight and die
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-05 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. Media leaves open question: where do Biden, Kerry, Obama etc stand on this
,not to mention Lieberman, Bayh, Schumer, Hillary, Bill himself? This has been a prominant question on many minds for months now. These people better preempt any Bush plans rhetorically now or kiss their asses goodbye as Prez candidates and kiss the 2006 elections goodbye too.

So far, no obvious position by any of these people. They better get going and figure something out to say. And do it from the heart not relying on polling and consultants!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H5N1 Donating Member (777 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. HELLO! This is a done deal
Man, you are way behind.
The reason we see INVADE IRAQ all the time on TV is
because bush is going to invade Iraq. And soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
titoresque Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-14-05 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC