shance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 05:15 PM
Original message |
| Randy Rhodes discussing General Byrnes now. |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 05:16 PM by shance
Tune in***
|
| shance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. "The Army gave NO specific allegation on General Byrnes". |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 05:27 PM by shance
This dog so won't hunt.
|
| blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. Thanks.....anything more? |
|
I've only heard that reporters are having difficulty getting ANY information on Byrnes.
|
| shance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 5. Not too much. Except how much it doesnt make ANY sense.. |
| shance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. The definition for "unspecified sexual misconduct" is......envelope please |
| flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 05:47 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. what Randi is saying... |
|
wife supported the general dating!!
he was 3rd in seniority ..of 11 generals...
his wife was totally supportive..
he was refusing to take kids who couldn't read or write..or who had criminal backgrounds because he said they would be dangerous to the other troops..he was told to take them or else basically...
joan jett was on and is good friends with him...said his marriage was totally over. last year..randi keeps saying he was booted for dating..she keeps saying he was dating!!
Randi said...
no 4 star general relieved of duty for disciplinary reason in recent history
|
| understandinglife
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 6. Wow! I sent a 'tip' to Huffington Post with a link to this thread ... |
|
... hopefully Arianna will give Randi a call, soon ...
Thank you!
Peace.
|
| jsamuel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 8. Randi made that part up of the top of her head!!! |
|
Edited on Tue Aug-16-05 05:56 PM by jsamuel
Don't quote it!
"he was refusing to take kids who couldn't read or write..or who had criminal backgrounds because he said they would be dangerous to the other troops..he was told to take them or else basically..."
Pissed me off she was spewing this crap when it is obviously bigger than that! It is obvious it is over Iraq or Iran...
|
| flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. she was also saying it was bigger than that.. |
|
but it was what she said..
and its whats been in print as well about the 50,000 troops Byrnes was told to take at lower standards...
she was talking about all of it...she was talking about it also being about iraq!
|
| flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
| 10. randi was pointing out that it was all a sham...n/t |
| shance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 11. Yeah, I think she reeled it back in, but you make a good point. |
|
That could in fact be true, but that was not anything that I have seen written before. And the other concerns needing to be addressed are certainly much larger than that.
|
| seemslikeadream
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-16-05 05:53 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:56 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
