Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The WHY of the leak, points to possible LEAKERS!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 11:56 AM
Original message
The WHY of the leak, points to possible LEAKERS!
The cover of a CIA agent was blown NOT for punishment of Wislon, NOR for a warning to others, but to undermine Wilson's credibility by implying his mission was self-initiated (thru his wife at the CIA). It was in error (his wife only provided the contact information so the CIA could give Wilson his directive--to look for yellow cake sales from Niger to Iraq). But the error did not matter. What did matter was immediately discrediting Wilson who was pointing fingers at Cheney and the White House for being remiss with his findings.

Therefore, it would be political operatives such as KARL ROVE and SCOOTER LIBBY, or maybe CHENEY himself!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Lewis Libby, Vice President Cheney's chief of staff -looks ready to fall
Edited on Tue Sep-30-03 12:00 PM by papau
From the ABCNote
""An article that appeared on the Time magazine Web site the same week Novak's column was published said that 'some government officials have noted to Time in interviews . . . that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, is a CIA official who monitors the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.' The same article quoted from an interview with I. Lewis Libby, Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, saying that Cheney did not know about Wilson's mission 'until this year when it became public in the last month or so.'" One obvious implication of this is that the oft-press shy Libby was taking journalists' calls during the period when Plame's name was named, but, of course, that doesn't mean that Libby had anything to do with it."


(So today an unbiased Ashcroft gives an unpredented heads-up to the target of an investigation - and indeed gives direction to the target of an investigation about when they should preserve documents - so the ABCnote asks)"Who at DOJ notified Gonzales?".."Why didn't Gonzales act to preserve material earlier?"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skip fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. so sweet, he's one of the Neo-Cons as well!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC