Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CIA Operative Story - How Will It Affect the Media?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 02:39 PM
Original message
CIA Operative Story - How Will It Affect the Media?
How will this story affect the media? Will they look bad, or pathetic?

We say the media is biased (conservative bent), is lazy (not investigating, just taking dictation), and has grown too fond of living among the rich and powerful. Will this story shake them up?

At least 6 reporters were contacted by the WH regarding Joe Wilson's wife. Did the WH try to set them up? More than 1 reporter called Joe Wilson about the story after talking with the WH - so Wilson knows who some of 6 are. My bet is that these reporters will be all Washington beat, political types - high profile, well-known names at ABC, NBC, CNN and maybe even Faux (it will be interesting to see if any are from Faux). I've heard Russert and Mitchells frostily say they don't reveal sources (Mitchell tried the Novak technique of saying not important - what she was aware of was not relevant to the story and thus was part of the story).

Novak printed the information, so he is in the hot seat. Other reporters did not print the info - are they heroes or villians? These other reporters have evidence of a crime - that a person leaked the name of a CIA operative. These other reporters will be investigated - perhaps some identified by Joe Wilson - perhaps determined by call logs or otherwise identified by the DOJ.

These other reporters had evidence of a crime but did not report it. The crime was that a WH person called them and leaked this information. Isn't just getting the call about the operative itself a story? Why did no reporter report that story? Why are these reporters clamming up now?

Are these reporters tarnished? Were they patsies? Were they in on it? Did they know it was a crime, and were they covering up for the WH (who apparently was too vengeful to consult the US Code?) Did they not realize the criminal part? Do they feel used? Will this scandal affect the way that the media interacts with the WH - will there be a cooling off of the cozy relationship? Will we have fewer pundits and more reporters, more facts and less spin?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-03 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. many of them are cia themselves....
andrea mitchel and novak obviously, but russert and too many others to mention!
mygod, the bfee SS has an unlimited budget; and people marvel at the media being whores?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC