Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-30-03 06:03 PM
Original message |
Is this a stupid question RE: Rove |
|
If Rove is *'s political advisor, why would he know about a CIA operative? He shouldn't be privy to that kind of info should he? If he was, I wanna fuckin' know why!!!
|
Padraig18
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-30-03 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If * knows it, Rove knows it!
|
IMayBeWrongBut
(470 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-30-03 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Yes, someone with authorized access must have told him. |
|
Maybe, Bush told him. Wouldn't that be a story....
|
MidwestTransplant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-30-03 06:07 PM
Response to Original message |
3. That's exactly the point I have been trying to make... |
|
Edited on Tue Sep-30-03 06:08 PM by MidwestTransplant
how did Rove have access to classified information. The most vile explination is that somebody with high security clearence in the WH gave him the info and told him to go to work. The least vile but still pretty vile is that he is allowed to sit in on classified briefings. Why would a political hack be allowed to do that?
|
BQueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-30-03 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Maybe that's why they're saying "everybody in DC knew it!" |
|
so they can claim that he didn't hear it from someone with security clearance.
|
Noon_Blue_Apples
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-30-03 06:07 PM
Response to Original message |
4. That's the true million dollar question |
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-30-03 06:11 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Well, it's a serious question on my part |
|
I really don't know who's supposed to know what. Is this something someone in Rove's position should know in the first place? If so, I'll leave it alone (just this small part of it...not the whole issue of course.)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:25 AM
Response to Original message |