karlrschneider
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 07:05 PM
Original message |
Why did Chimpy cite casualty numbers today in speech? |
|
I don't recall him ever doing that before...obviously somebody thought it would be useful for him and his bullshit "war", but I can't see HOW. Anybody got a theory?
|
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Proving he's paying slight attention? |
OrlandoGator
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Because he's a psychopath? |
etherealtruth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. I was going to agree with response #1 |
|
... but, decided yours was the only correct reason
|
ayeshahaqqiqa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 07:07 PM
Response to Original message |
3. so that more people can go die |
|
for those who are already dead. Hey, I think this is tha latest reason to stay in Iraq.
|
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. If you look at his record in public office... |
|
You can tell he sure does love death, dying and killing folks.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 07:08 PM
Response to Original message |
4. He's trying to look sensitive. Think Cindy Sheehan. |
|
Phony as a 3 dollar bill.
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 07:09 PM
Response to Original message |
6. To make it sound like he cares about the casualties and their families |
|
(he mentioned the families as well). Could he be any more transparent?
He would never had done this if it wasn't for Cindy Sheehan.
|
proud patriot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 07:10 PM
Response to Original message |
7. He's running out of options |
|
so far nothing has worked to turn support around for his Imperialist agenda
|
Wickerman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 07:10 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I seriously think its a new meme |
|
Edited on Mon Aug-22-05 07:11 PM by Wickerman
its only 1,800 and change. I heard today, seriously, someone say that this isn't at all like Vietnam. Only 1,800 dead, not the 50k of 'Nam. Oh yeah, and fuck the civilians, their deaths don't matter - remember, we are fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them here.
If they minimize the number (and the RW Hacks will soon do so) then Bush suddenly looks wise and glorious to the boobs who support him, including the vacuous middle that swings with the trend in opinion polls.
edit, html
|
TomInTib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Trying to get in front of the issue |
|
If they believe a large offensive is pending death toll numbers have a somewhat numbing effect. Make them numbers, not names.
|
Inspired
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Yep, it's because of Cindy. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:09 PM
Response to Original message |