Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran's devastating weapon that no one talks about

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 10:19 PM
Original message
Iran's devastating weapon that no one talks about
I don't know with certainty that it exists. What if they have smoking gun evidence that the 1980 "October Surprise" deal with Reagan/Bush was real? Could it be used as blackmail against the administration to deter attack?

I imagine it would be used with great reluctance, since exposure of a deal might have serious negative reaction in Iran as well as the United States. But in the face of an attack, there might be little to lose.

October Surprise:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_Surprise

I've never dug into the allegation enough to decide how much merit Gary Sick's book had.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting thought
but I think by now most people know that Reagan (the Admin, not the man) had to be working behind the scenes. It would be a blip on the history screen and the comics would get some late night work out of it and then it would be forgotten. This country has become so confused about what is good and what is bad, what is right and what is wrong that I don't think this would raise an eyebrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I read Sick's book years ago and found it compelling.
But, as another poster points out, by today's standards the mere queering of an election by making a corrupt deal with a foreign government to prolong a hostage crisis is pretty small potatoes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gary Sick took a lot of...
... shit for his book. But, you should also look at Robert Parry's collected articles on the subject. Just go to:

http://www.consortiumnews.com

and search for the X-files. There will be about 15-20 articles on that time period.

From those, I think you'll find that knowledge of dealing with Reagan's people was very compartmentalized in the Iranian government. Not everyone in it knew of those meetings, and many of those that were purported to have engaged in those meetings may not be alive today.

Besides, it's old history and a different administration (albeit with a lot of the same players). I'm sure that if Iran thought there was any advantage in revealing that information, they would have done so already. Moreover, what would the response of the right wing be? They'd scream, "lies" and go on about their business.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks for the link
The political impact might be stronger. We are talking about treason, and Dubya's dad. Mor important - in the context of fighting terrorism, it would be hard to find anything in modern history that did more to encourage it's use as a political tool.

A lot would depend on how strong the evidence was. Based on recent experience, If Rove knew it was coming out, I would expect some "forged" evidence to get leaked and then exposed. Nothing would be believed after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. As for it being a political tool...
... that's old news, too. We know, because of Iran-Contra, that the Reagan/Bush administration traded arms for hostages with Iran. But, the Congress and the courts have already decided that one--it's old history, too, and the major figures were protected.

One has to concentrate on this administration's actions--otherwise, the media just ignores it all. They will just dredge up all the old excuses (the senior Bush: "I was out of the loop on that one").

Now, if it could be proved definitively, yeah, it might hurt the Republicans in general, but it won't hurt Bush, Jr. (unless you can find evidence he was involved, and I don't know of that).

It was twenty-five years ago. About a third of the voting population have no direct memory of those events or that election.

Nope, I'm afraid if one wants to bring down Bush and the Republicans, it's going to have to be based on current events (and, lord knows, there's enough of those that are nasty and foul).

Cheers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. they should just expose it now
They can expose more later if need be. I'm sure there are plenty of subsequent illegal arms sales to talk about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-05 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Anything can be
We have been so dirty in the Middle East it is pathetic. Reagan had his deals with Saddam, we built bunkers and all that stuff. I would not doubt that Iran has dirt on us too. Maybe with the Shrub family. I saw GW holding hand with Saudi Royalty. The Whole things smell of camel dung!! :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC