Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jon Stewart vs. Hitchens... what happened tonight....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DougieZero Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:36 PM
Original message
Jon Stewart vs. Hitchens... what happened tonight....
Some people see these excited threads and probably think it's being exaggerated, but this was the real deal. It was a smart intellectual debate and was won by Jon Stewart... it was a dismantling point by point... done the honest way.... no shouting, no screaming... it was calm and devastating to Hitchens. It’s was basically everything you wish you could do if you had 7 minutes with a hardcore war supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Am Convinced And Will Definitely Watch At 11 Here In CA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. can hardly wait!
Im in Seattle and I'll probably tape it and watch it twice!

http://www.cafepress.com/scarebaby/654252
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'll watch it on Crooks and
Liars tomorrow night!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I got my wish. I wanted to see Stewart "Goldberg" him and he did!
Thank you Daily Show, oh heavenly creator of all things politically funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks to everyone in the eastern zone for the heads up!!!!
I'm setting up the VCR now...no way I'm gonna make it to 2300.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. This was the first time I saw Hitchens but
Edited on Thu Aug-25-05 10:42 PM by zoeb
I didn't get the impression he was a huge supporter of Bush. He agreed with something Jon said and then Hitchens said, "You go to war with the president you have" like he understood Dubya wasn't up to the task.

Jon should have did the entire show with Hitchens because it was great to watch.

edit to apologize for spoiling a little!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DougieZero Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. his buddy is David Horowitz nt/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. ick!!!
I think he left his Horowitz influence in the green room...or some of it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hitchens is a weird guy
And some happen to think the whole thing is an act - he's a notorious contrarian.

He's actually a hardcore, pinko leftist on economic issues. He used to often write for the Nation and used to attack the Labor Party and much of the English and American political cultures from the left.

But he couples this with being a hardcore Neo-Con. He wrote an article in The Nation (of all places) endorsing Bush for his neocon tendencies. Then he wrote on Slate that he was voting for Kerry on competency issues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. That explains what I saw on tonight's show
He was definitely pro-war but not pro-Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I think the emphasis should be on...
... "used to often write...."

Hitchens reminds me greatly of Jack Kerouac in his waning days--quarrelsome, authoritarian in tone and starting to lose his perspective. Just plain too much alcohol for far too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Wow. Now THAT is a cultural reference with some punch.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Yeah I recall when he claimed he would vote for Kerry
He's truly twisted but a fascinating character. I also remember him claiming that Clinton "raped" Cathleen Wiley. He has a pathalogical hatred of the Clintons, in the same vein as Richard Mellon Scaife, or the other rabid RW Clinton haters.

At the same time, I actually thought he had some good points on extremist Islam after 9/11 but of course he completely drank the kool aid and backed the administration on the war.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
26. "He's actually a hardcore"
Alcoholic.

That's why his views seem so convoluted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. jon stewart called the right on dismissing people as anti war
that has long been needed said. and stewart did it. not about wanting to pull out, about bush incompetence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. 9/14/05 Galloway vs. Hitchens...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaygore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I hope you are right. Stewart needs to do more of this.
Instead of letting people off with pussy interviews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. "You're a drink-soaked former Trotskyist popinjay,"
Web Results 1 - 10 of about 880 for popinjay hitchens. (0.18 seconds)
Tip: Save time by hitting the return key instead of clicking on "search"

Guardian Unlimited | The Guardian | Galloway and the mother of all ...
"You're a drink-soaked former Trotskyist popinjay," Mr Galloway in formed him.
... You badly need another drink," he added later, ignoring Mr Hitchens's ...
www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,1486417,00.html - 39k - Aug 25, 2005 - Cached - Similar pages

Daily Kos: Sheehan slander: Hitchens steps WAY over the line on C-SPAN
We all know drink-soaked former Trotskyist popinjay Christopher Hitchens is an
... The drink-soaked popinjay Hitchens is, like Kim Philby, surrendering his ...
legalspice.dailykos.com/story/2005/8/18/20447/5293 - 28k - Cached - Similar pages

(Admiral) 05/08/19 08:10 PM "When the Conservative movement ...
George Galloway nailed him as a drink-soaked former Trotskyite popinjay.
Hitchens response was to mutter a reply, something which wouldn't have happened 20 ...
www.trekbbs.com/threads/printthread.php?Cat=& Board=Debateforum&main=4883052&type=thread - 48k - Cached - Similar pages

Unmitigated Galloway
by Christopher Hitchens 05/30/2005, Volume 010, Issue 35 ... tone and said that
this was just what he'd expect from a "drink-sodden ex-Trotskyist popinjay. ...
www.weeklystandard.com/Content/ Public/Articles/000/000/005/641kyjkk.asp - 24k - Aug 24, 2005 - Cached - Similar pages

RoguePlanet
Drink-soaked former Trotskyist popinjay Christopher Hitchens has a column up at
Slate entitled Losing the Iraq War: Can the left really want us to? ...
rogueplanet.blogspot.com/2005/ 08/drink-soaked-former-trotskyist.html - 21k - Cached - Similar pages

The Liberal Avenger: Galloway on Christopher Hitchens
'You're a drink-soaked former Trotskyist popinjay,' Mr Galloway informed him.
... Eventually Mr Hitchens gave up. 'You're a real thug, aren't you? ...
liberalavenger.com/2005/05/ galloway-on-christopher-hitchens.html - 28k - Cached - Similar pages

Orbis Quintus » Blog Archive » The Popinjay Responds
The Popinjay Responds. Hitchens’ new article in the Weekly Standard (? ...
Galloway’s now-famous slur on Hitchens (”drink-sodden ex-Trotskyist popinjay”) ...
orbis-quintus.net/blog/?p=1422 - 21k - Cached - Similar pages

Forums - Drink-soaked Trotskyite popinjay slimes antiwar Mom
Posts: 1009, Drink-soaked Trotskyite popinjay slimes antiwar Mom. Christopher
Hitchens and other Trotskyite neo-con wackos are trying desperately to slime ...
engforum.pravda.ru/showthread. php3?threadid=139550&goto=nextnewest - 27k - Cached - Similar pages

Shock Tales And Cocktails -
But popinjay? “It’sa kind of target used in archery,” says Hitchens. “A lovely
word, I’ve used it myself and it’s truer than he knows. ...
www.sundayherald.com/50074 - 34k - Aug 24, 2005 - Cached - Similar pages

LP: Christopher Hitchens: Letter to the Left
"drink-sodden Trotskyiest popinjay." I think that sums up Hitchens in a nutshell.
Anyone else want to join the slanderer of Mother Theresa and support the ...
www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=105594 - 24k - Cached - Similar pages


http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=popinjay+hitchens&btnG=Search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Wow, Hitchens v. Galloway -THAT should be stellar. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
akarnitz Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
17. It's up on Crooks&Liars
and I'm not so sure Stewart dismantled him point for point.

Hitchens seems to believe passionately in upholding the integrity, not to say the safety of the Iraqi people. However, it still mystifies me how he jumped in bed with the neocons. The 'cons wouldn't
dare use the human rights of Arabs as even the tertiary issue of justification of this invasion- it would come across as the "Clinton" thing to do to the base of their support AND it would get the Saudis all twisted up.

Hitchens did express displeasure in Chimpy, but he still towed the terrorism and WMD lines. Saddam harbored Abu Abbas. Saddam used gas on the Kurds. Both are givens. But, at the risk of sounding insensitive, these things ocurred quite a while back. And though the U.S. condemned these actions at some point in time, our government never deemed these as casus belli(sorry if my Latin grammar/spelling are off).

Hitchens also raised the point of the unfinished business of Desert Storm. Surely, unlike so many of those on the Rethug wagon, Hitchens is well aware of the objectives of the Coalition mandate in that war.
G.H.W. Bush decided the objective (of freeing Kuwait) had been met. Furtherance of hostilities on the part of the U.S. would have led to long term diplomatic damage between the U.S. and the rest of the world, much of the Coalition included, and unacceptable casualties to both the U.S. (and the Coalition members who might have chosen to stay on) and the Iraqi populace. And for what? Unlike Germany after WWI, Iraq's military had been shown for what it was and decimated. The Iraqi infrastructure was in ruins. The regime remained intact but toothless, but to their own people. They could not, in the forseen future, conduct an offensive war.

Like Hitchens, I deplore Saddam's human rights abuses. Unlike him, however, I could not stomach throwing my support to the neocon cabal, the people who so transparently rigged the WMD and terrorism evidence; who took under advisement an Ahmed Chalabi, infamous conman; who botched the capture of Osama Bin Laden. With two years of lies and deceit, of politicizing the most horriffic act to happen to the American people, of feeding the corporate interests at the expense of the American people(the same corporate interests that would profit most from this adventure) I could not support this war as led by G.W. Bush. And, after more than 1,800 U.S. deaths and god only knows how many Iraqi deaths, Hitchens, however altruistic his original intentions, should be ashamed to continue his support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Bit Jon still did a great job speaking for the left
We are not anti-military, we are adults and hve justified reasons for questioning this president and this war.

I love how Jon talked about Bush's "Watergate polling numbers." I also thought that he got a lot out of Trent, the racist, shit head Senator of my state, Lott to admit that we went to war in the completely wrong way. Jon was nice and brutal all at the same time.

You have to pay attention when Jon is questioning a RWer, he is trying to get as much real information out of them as possible, it's amazing how off guard he gets them sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
akarnitz Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I'm not saying Stewart did a bad job,
but he seemed awfully chummy w/Hitch. Hell, I still agree w/most thing the old sot has to say. I just don't think that John totally
shredded Hitchens' arguments, but John did bring him down a few pegs.

BTW, Melodybe, I love seeing the Conyers avatars. He makes me proud to be a Michigander. Here, on the other side of the mitten, it's hard to find Dems. It must be the fumes from AMWAY....I mean ALTACOR(they changed their name, but not their practices). ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melodybe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Mississippians love John Conyers, he is such a hero!
I was surprised when I talked to a few people the other day, they were hoping that Morgan Freeman would challenge Barbour for Governor.

He'd win by a landslide, Freeman is incredibly popular in MS as well, ever since Shawshank Redemption he has been MS's favortie son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Hehe you know speaking of Freeman
I was just thinkin if they ever made a movie about Conyers, Freeman would be a great choice to play him.

Good luck in getting Freeman to run for governor. I saw him being interviewed on CNN and he's very admirable himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
22. Has anybody ever kind of run off the set after the interview like that?
I think Hitchens knew he lost that one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
akarnitz Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. They tape in the early evening
and he was rushing so he could catch the end of Happy Hour.:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-05 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
27. The video is
now up at crooks and liars :woohoo: :woohoo:

jenn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC