|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Lexingtonian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:06 PM Original message |
Gallup: Bush approval 40%, disapproval 56% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
1. HOLY FUCKING SHIT!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
2. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Gallup was fudging a 39%... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. And this is Gallup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Did you read the OP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
4. Whoa! Gallup has finally corrected their samples? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flubadubya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. No... they still tilt right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:24 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. How can you say that, though? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flubadubya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Oops, sorry Roland... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. heh...I can't help but wonder if some of the Rep. are now Ind. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lexingtonian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. it's selfreported Party ID |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. That makes sense with Zogby and would explain Nov. 2004's results. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlamoDemoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
5. I am surprised it took this long for the American public |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pauldavid (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
7. marking a slow but steady decline? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EnfantTerrible (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:18 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. They're trying not to incite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. It's literally a DECIMATION of Bush-supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flubadubya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:24 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. And don't forget rigged voting apparatus... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:52 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. eh? decimation is reduction to 1/10 of prior n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 02:23 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. (Hmmmm...) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 02:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
26. It's about time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
8. LMFAO. LOSERRRRRRRRRR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
12. I'm Shocked, Seriously!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
samsingh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 02:50 PM Response to Reply #12 |
27. yes Beetwasher, i was keeping tabs on your predication |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 03:54 PM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Keeping Tabs On Me, Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
13. that is gallup language, so reality, 37-38%... i have learned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:54 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. my guess is there's a larger coverup going on these days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
14. drop...mostly among Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 02:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. Usually by now, polls would be indicating a bump |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
24. "Popular president has mandate with 40% approval!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trogdor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
28. My prediction was 41% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrrevolution (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 02:57 PM Response to Original message |
29. repub spin "Bush Most Popular President To Poll 40% or Less" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-26-05 04:10 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. heh heh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:03 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC