Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Due To These Facts They Should Be Charged With Negligent Homicide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 12:31 AM
Original message
Due To These Facts They Should Be Charged With Negligent Homicide
CHRONOLOGY....Here's a timeline that outlines the fate of both FEMA and flood control projects in New Orleans under the Bush administration. Read it and weep:


January 2001: Bush appoints Joe Allbaugh, a crony from Texas, as head of FEMA. Allbaugh has no previous experience in disaster management.


April 2001: Budget Director Mitch Daniels announces the Bush administration's goal of privatizing much of FEMA's work. In May, Allbaugh confirms that FEMA will be downsized: "Many are concerned that federal disaster assistance may have evolved into both an oversized entitlement program...." he said. "Expectations of when the federal government should be involved and the degree of involvement may have ballooned beyond what is an appropriate level."


2001: FEMA designates a major hurricane hitting New Orleans as one of the three "likeliest, most catastrophic disasters facing this country."


December 2002: After less than two years at FEMA, Allbaugh announces he is leaving to start up a consulting firm that advises companies seeking to do business in Iraq. He is succeeded by his deputy, Michael Brown, who, like Allbaugh, has no previous experience in disaster management.


March 2003: FEMA is downgraded from a cabinet level position and folded into the Department of Homeland Security. Its mission is refocused on fighting acts of terrorism.


2003: Under its new organization chart within DHS, FEMA's preparation and planning functions are reassigned to a new Office of Preparedness and Response. FEMA will henceforth focus only on response and recovery.


Summer 2004: FEMA denies Louisiana's pre-disaster mitigation funding requests. Says Jefferson Parish flood zone manager Tom Rodrigue: "You would think we would get maximum consideration....This is what the grant program called for. We were more than qualified for it."


June 2004: The Army Corps of Engineers budget for levee construction in New Orleans is slashed. Jefferson Parish emergency management chiefs Walter Maestri comments: "It appears that the money has been moved in the president's budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that's the price we pay."


June 2005: Funding for the New Orleans district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is cut by a record $71.2 million. One of the hardest-hit areas is the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, which was created after the May 1995 flood to improve drainage in Jefferson, Orleans and St. Tammany parishes.


August 2005: While New Orleans is undergoing a slow motion catastrophe, Bush mugs for the cameras, cuts a cake for John McCain, plays the guitar for Mark Wills, delivers an address about V-J day, and continues with his vacation. When he finally gets around to acknowledging the scope of the unfolding disaster, he delivers only a photo op on Air Force One and a flat, defensive, laundry list speech in the Rose Garden.


So: A crony with no relevant experience was installed as head of FEMA. Mitigation budgets for New Orleans were slashed even though it was known to be one of the top three risks in the country. FEMA was deliberately downsized as part of the Bush administration's conservative agenda to reduce the role of government. After DHS was created, FEMA's preparation and planning functions were taken away.

Actions have consequences. No one could predict that a hurricane the size of Katrina would hit this year, but the slow federal response when it did happen was no accident. It was the result of four years of deliberate Republican policy and budget choices that favor ideology and partisan loyalty at the expense of operational competence. It's the Bush administration in a nutshell.





http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2005_09/007023.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. GENOCIDE
And furthermore, absence of malice cannot be established.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I thought I'd just go for the easiest charge to prove.
It's a slam dunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. With the reports that
no aid is allowed in and no people allowed out I'd say we have a good shot at Manslaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. Also - as I understand it
Brown"s boss, Chertoff head of Homeland Security was an assistant to Ken Starr - no emergency experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wilful and wanton disregard would be a better standard to hold him to
because it is more accurate: they just didn't care.

wanton: adj. 1) grossly negligent to the extent of being recklessly unconcerned with the safety of people or property. Examples: speeding by a school while it is letting out students or firing a shotgun in a public park. 2) sexually immoral and unrestrained. http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?typed=wanton&type=1&submit1.x=74&submit1.y=12&submit1=Look+up


negligence: n. failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do in the circumstances, or taking action which such a reasonable person would not. Negligence is accidental as distinguished from "intentional torts" (assault or trespass, for example) or from crimes, but a crime can also constitute negligence, such as reckless driving. Negligence can result in all types of accidents causing physical and/or property damage, but can also include business errors and miscalculations, such as a sloppy land survey. In making a claim for damages based on an allegation of another's negligence, the injured party (plaintiff) must prove: a) that the party alleged to be negligent had a duty to the injured party-specifically to the one injured or to the general public, b) that the defendant's action (or failure to act) was negligent-not what a reasonably prudent person would have done, c) that the damages were caused ("proximately caused") by the negligence. An added factor in the formula for determining negligence is whether the damages were "reasonably foreseeable" at the time of the alleged carelessness. http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?selected=1314&bold=||||

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Sounds reasonable
Who is going to prosecute? Let's get a retainer. I'm in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Fitzgerald? Too bad Jim Garrison is gone
Let's see what he does with Plamegate.

Garrison prosecuting the pResident over the destruction of New Orleans, going after government cover-ups, too bad he's gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I thought about Garrison too. He was an amazing attorney.
and a courageous man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Hey
I think it would be more than appropriate if the Supreme Court marshalled his ass. Yes. The same ones who installed his lunacy should remove him. Is that legally feasible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. The Supremes are primarily an appeals court
Besides, I don't trust them. IMHO, a trial should be held in Lousiana, Mississippi or Alabama, that is the areas affected and therefore the proper venue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Think weather trends in Oil Market Speculation.
Edited on Sat Sep-03-05 12:50 AM by Wizard777
I think they were creating an opportunitry, just like business men do, and Katrina Realized that speculation. They hit the jackpot AGAIN. If we saw this leg off. If anyone even looks at the table it will fall and we're Billionaires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. norml
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
copyrighted news source.


Thank you.


DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
norml Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Oops! Sorry
It was late.

I was tired.

Usually I'd remember to do that.

I must have been thinking of it as a list, and not an article.

I'd just gotten home from closing at the restaurant, and was about to stay up until dawn hosting some KZUM blues thing.

Wish I didn't have to go to work this afternoon.

My apologies for making your job harder.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. Start by charging Michael Brown ---
I believe there are some posts here indicating he's run afoul of the law before. City of New Orleans v Michael Brown. Or a victim's surviving family v Michael Brown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
13. "an oversized entitlement program"
Exactly. Handing out food and water to the people of NO is too much like welfare -- that's why they waited until the last possible moment.

Those pictures of him laughing it up and playing guitar are a message to us: NOT HIS PROBLEM.

It will be his problem when the people of this country riot and demand his head on a pike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. or perhaps Depraved Indifference n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC