Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Homeland Security lightbulb joke

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dsewell Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:45 PM
Original message
Homeland Security lightbulb joke
Edited on Sat Sep-03-05 07:46 PM by dsewell
Q: How long does it take Michael Chertoff to change a lightbulb?

A: Five days.

On the first day, he notices that the lightbulb is out.

On the second day, he brings a new lightbulb.

On the third day, he screws the lightbulb in, but the room remains dark.

On the fourth day, someone points out to him that he has forgotten to flip the light switch.

On the fifth day, he flips the light switch and the light comes back on.

And on the sixth day, he holds a news conference to say that no one could have predicted a scenario where lightbulb filament failure would be accompanied by a light switch in the off position!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fiveleafclover Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Beautiful!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
idiosyncratic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent!
Thanks for that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. And on the 7th day he rests
Screwing in light bulbs is hard werk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Excellent, but I would change it:
On the first day, he hears that the lightbulb is out but doesn't believe it.

On the second day, he grudgingly concedes we need a new light bulb and makes a note to buy one.

On the third day, he goes to the store to get a lightbulb but gets distracted by free ice cream.

On the fourth day, he finally buys a lightbulb.

On the fifth day, he screws it in, but the room remains dark.

On the sixth day, someone points out he has forgotten to flip the switch.

And on the seventh day, he flips the switch, the light comes on, and points out that no one could have predicted a scenario where lightbulb filament failure would be accompanied by a light switch in the off position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. don't forget day 3, when switch-flippers are kept out of the room
by armed patrols
on day 4, gunmen are said to be seen in the dark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. he's already committed obvious perjury....I linked this during his
Edited on Sat Sep-03-05 08:27 PM by Gabi Hayes
confirmation hearings

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/13/1455248

"We speak with former Justice Department attorney, Jesselyn Radack, who charges that department officials under Michael Chertoff improperly questioned John Waker Lindh and that her memos raising ethical concerns about his interrogation were purged and not turned over to a criminal court.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Chertoff, President Bush's Homeland Security Chief nominee, was praised by Senate Democrats and state lawyers this week as being a tough but fair prosecutor who would serve well as Tom Ridge's replacement.
But as his record comes under fresh scrutiny, questions are being raised about his handling of the case of John Walker Lindh - the so-called American Taliban. As head of the criminal division of the Justice Department, the 2002 prosecution of Lindh was one of Chertoff"s biggest triumphs.

But the case resurfaced the following year in Senate confirmation hearings after Chertoff was nominated to be a federal appellate judge. At that time, Senate Democrats questioned Chertoff extensively about concerns that the FBI might have improperly questioned Lindh in Afghanistan even though his family had hired a lawyer for him. "


there's another, well documented, story about him representing a doctor who had probably terror financing ties
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Unfortunately, he put a 10 watt bulb in a 100 watt city.
Shame!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC