Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Doctor says Red Cross should have been there

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 11:01 PM
Original message
Doctor says Red Cross should have been there
Ok, so Red Cross was not in New Orleans because it would have been "in harms way" (that means if you crawl on glass about 100 miles away from the disaster, they MAY allow you to enter their air conditioned shelter and get a cup of water).

See: "Homeland Security won't let Red Cross deliver food"

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05246/565143.stm.

(So why couldn't they have loaded trucks for the NG to bring the supplies in?)

But why the heck aren't they at the airport?

"Doctor says Red Cross should have been there"

http://www.kbcitv.com/x5154.xml?ParentPageID=x5155&ContentID=x51828&Layout=KBCI.xsl&AdGroupID=x5154&URL=http://localhost/apwirefeed/d8ccvvqg1.xml&NewsSection=NationalHeadlines

September 3, 2005 12:56 PM

The Associated Press

NEW ORLEANS "Where is the Red Cross?"

A doctor at the airport in New Orleans posed that question today to an Associated Press reporter. The doctor, one of the first to set up a triage center at the airport, says he wishes the Red Cross had been there, since the organization has the expertise to set up that kind of facility. He said he hasn't seen any Red Cross presence there.

And the picture that emerges is a bleak one. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a surgeon who visted the airport today, says the hallways and floors are "filled," and that people are dying because the resources aren't there to treat them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Its criminal that desperately needed resources were prevented from
getting into NO. There is no excuse for this. None whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Well, Clara Barton would be quite angry. The military welcomed her help.
And Florence Nightingale, well, Florence flowed right past the army and set up shop. She didn't wait for protection, or permission. She fought the opposition to her nurses helping the wounded and ill. And the Army brass be damned.

Actually, I wonder if some of them weren't. :)

Florence reminds me of Cindy Sheehan. Strength, grace, honor and purpose defines them both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've heard they weren't there because they were told
it was 'too dangerous'. In fact, many people were told that. Makes me wonder, 'too dangerous' for who? And who was handling the info or spin-FEMA? This needs to be looked into. Major incompetence or downright eliticism or racism. Whatever happened, heads need to roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. People are dieing because it has been too long and no resources and
those capable of getting the resources there didn't care. MrFrist.


Resources aren't there to treat them. Obviously. I hope this sticks in Frist's little mind and conscience for the rest of his life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Columbine, sheriff wouldn't let his men go in because
Edited on Sat Sep-03-05 11:10 PM by caligirl
it was too dangerous, so kids were murdered instead of saved by those PAID to face the bullets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-05 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. People who were shot and could have lived died because of that.
And that is the truth. Columbine was a tragedy on so many levels. The clueless law enforcement was a major problem. One kid broke a window and fell out on his own. I watched on TV with both of my kids. A random group of officers did approach and bring him in. Otherwise, he would have died from his wounds.

The people in charge were clueless, and they were not heroes. They left innocents to die. They were cowards. The mothers would have done better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC