Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Or we could talk about this lie from Sept. 7 2002, debunked by IAEA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 03:28 PM
Original message
Or we could talk about this lie from Sept. 7 2002, debunked by IAEA
I have not heard much about his one lately. Something similar appeared on MSNBC on the 27th of Sept, but I can't find the article now.

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/attack/2002/0930atomic.htm
SNIP...."The International Atomic Energy Agency says that a report cited by President Bush as evidence that Iraq in 1998 was "six months away" from developing a nuclear weapon does not exist.

"There's never been a report like that issued from this agency," Mark Gwozdecky, the IAEA's chief spokesman, said yesterday in a telephone interview from the agency's headquarters in Vienna, Austria. "We've never put a time frame on how long it might take Iraq to construct a nuclear weapon in 1998," said the spokesman of the agency charged with assessing Iraq's nuclear capability for the United Nations.

In a Sept. 7 news conference with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Mr. Bush said: "I would remind you that when the inspectors first went into Iraq and were denied — finally denied access , a report came out of the Atomic — the IAEA that they were six months away from developing a weapon. "I don't know what more evidence we need," said the president, defending his administration's case that Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was building weapons of mass destruction....."END SNIP

Well, this is more than 16 words. I have not seen this lately. Debunked by the IAEA, in no uncertain terms.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. They did admit that was a mistake
Somewhere along the line. But it sure is an indication of their willingness to say anything. And there's also these little ditties:

“Most of the IAEA activities…destruction, removal and rendering harmless… Iraq’s nuclear weapons programme…were completed by the end of 1992. …only a relatively small number of items… have been identified and disposed of… since the events of August 1995.” July 27 1998 IAEA Report to UN

"There is no indication of resumed nuclear activities in those buildings that were identified through the use of satellite imagery as being reconstructed or newly erected since 1998, nor any indication of nuclear-related prohibited activities at any inspected sites," Dr. ElBaradei U.N. Security Council. Mar 7, 2003

“At only a few inspected sites involved in industrial research, development and manufacturing have the facilities been improved and new personnel been taken on. This overall deterioration in industrial capacity is naturally of direct relevance to Iraq's capability for resuming a nuclear weapons programme.” Dr. ElBaradei Mar 7, 2003
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmags Donating Member (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. I believe that's one of those times when the White House
said Bush "misspoke"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC