Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Definition of High Crimes and Misdemeanors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:01 PM
Original message
Definition of High Crimes and Misdemeanors
It seems our boy Bush has pretty clearly performed a high crime or misdemeanor.

===

"High crimes and misdemeanors" entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment -- treason and bribery -- were not enough. He worried that other "great and dangerous offenses" might not be covered, and suggested adding the word "maladministration." Madison argued that term was too vague, so Mason then proposed "high crimes and misdemeanors," a phrase well-known in English common law. In 18th century language, a "misdemeanor" meant "mis-demeanor,"or bad behavior (neglect of duty and corruption were given as examples), while "high crimes" was roughly equivalent to "great offenses."

Lawyers and historians are still arguing about the exact meaning of "high crimes and misdemeanors," dividing into three schools of thought about the appropriate definition: (1) serious criminality evidenced by breaking existing law; (2) an abuse of office, and (3) the Alexander Hamilton standard (Federalist 65) of "violation of public trust."

===

Seems there is plenty of evidence for a pretty solid impeachment here.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cssmall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. You see, Bush didn't neglect his duty because he wasn't fuckin' an intern.
Blame it on Clinton's Penis. He was too busy having sex with an intern in *gasp* the Oval Office. Ha! I wonder how the republicans would feel if they knew that Bush was fucking some of his compadres in the ass in the Oval Office. See, that's why they hate Clinton he violated the public trust by defilin' the Oval Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-04-05 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC