Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Viewpoint: Has Katrina saved US media? (BBC-- Must read!)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:31 AM
Original message
Viewpoint: Has Katrina saved US media? (BBC-- Must read!)
Viewpoint: Has Katrina saved US media?
By Matt Wells
BBC News, Los Angeles

As President Bush scurries back to the Gulf Coast, it is clear that this is the greatest challenge to politics-as-usual in America since the fall of Richard Nixon in the 1970s.

But unlike Watergate, "Katrinagate" was public service journalism ruthlessly exposing the truth on a live and continuous basis.

Instead of secretive "Deep Throat" meetings in car-parks, cameras captured the immediate reality of what was happening at the New Orleans Convention Center, making a mockery of the stalling and excuses being put forward by those in power.

MORE at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4214516.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is Compassionate Conservatism
I don't trust the media to not turn back to giving Bush a bow...What we need to do is to focus on what the Media is showing us as an example of George Bush's compassionate Conservatism. This is what republicanism does folks. It lets people die in favor of tax cuts and wars to benefit big corporations and oil companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flakey_foont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. great article!
Thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimmyJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. See also comment on the piece here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. The BBC presumes....
...that most Americans have a brain and can understand the reporting on their tv screens. I am under no such illusions. Many people (roughly half) in this country are either too damned stupid or too damned stubborn to believe what they are seeing (even on FOX News). By now I am too damned jaded to believe that many in this country will ever get a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'll wager........
that 60% of Americans can't name 3 of Bush's cabinet members. Same with Justices on the Supreme Court. I'll bet the same number couldn't name their state senators and congressmen.
I'm a little older than most here, 54, but I can remember a time in this country when just about everyone KNEW who was running the government. They were involved, THEY CARED! Now, people just go about their lives in a constant ignorant funk, not knowing or caring who, or in the case of Corporate America, what, is leading them and to where. It's disgraceful, it really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prodemsouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Thank You. I don't put too much stock in British commentary
and analysis of USA current events. For the most part it is usually wrong. Its based on assumptions about the UK and then applied to the USA. The Media has a long way to go before we can even ask the question "is their spine back". Plus the elimination of the Fairness Doctrine, the growth of cable news has allowed for more political spin and for pundits to gain heavy influence in American News. The Media is still very much corporate America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bumblebee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Great article and implications for Texas are also intriguing
"Tens of thousands of voters whose lives have been so devastated will cast their mid-term ballots in Texas next year - the president's adopted home state."


Hope they do register and vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. Lying liars
I like this response:

"Now how about telling the truth, retroactively as well as prospectively, as you see it, catch us citizens up on what else you have known the governments are lying about?"
Hank Roberts, Berkeley, CA, USA


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. This quote made the hair stand up on my arms:
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 08:27 AM by crispini
"Tens of thousands of voters whose lives have been so devastated will cast their mid-term ballots in Texas next year - the president's adopted home state."

Texas = blue state, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneGrassRoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
11. about the media...........
aside from the switch we saw from media this past week, mainly because many of those reporters were witnessing the horror and negligence, don't you think they smell blood?

I mean, I can't imagine they will go back to business as usual....they are all acknowledging how the blogosphere is huge, they certainly are seeing/hearing the outcry from the American public about the events of the past week, so surely, surely they will at least try to get more investigative journalism into the mix rather than spouting Repub talking points. There are too many things brewing that are potentially explosive for this administration.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Normally I would agree with you....
...but nothing has been normal in this country for 5 years now. I no longer have ANY faith in the media. Time and time again they have turned their backs on reporting the truth in this country. I can't imagine their attention span being captured by anything for very long anymore. I honest to god have no hope left for this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. I think that on-the-scene reporters have had a quiet rage
over how stifled they have been by vain anchors with lame questions and contemptible greedheaditors serving corporate masters and I think we are seeing the results now.

Perhaps they recognize that if they don't emerge from journalism schoold in perfect suits with perfect teeth they don't have a chance to rise above; maybe it's simply they can't see an impossible situation without an honest human reaction.

Whatever--in this case, the benefit of the doubt is granted, IMHO.

Contrast the US press's (I'm willing to restore that honorable term to them now) reaction to the authorities with their reaction post 9-11.

The contrast between overseas newspaper reporting and US reporting is striking, but the on-the-scene reports have been quite extraordinary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC