Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Monster Chimp just DOESN'T give up does he? WTF?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
...of J.Temperance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:31 AM
Original message
The Monster Chimp just DOESN'T give up does he? WTF?
So, I wake up today and what confronts me? Shit-fer-Brains has nominated John Roberts to replace William Rehnquist as Chief Justice :evilfrown:

Roberts has only been a Judge for about TWO years and has little experience...oh but THAT'S NOT important is it? Let's just ignore it and MOVE on. I HATE these fucking pig fuckers :nuke:

And I BET that the MONSTER nominates that fucking frigid-looking pissant Edith Fucking Jones next.

He has NO right to be nominating people, he's NOT even legitimately elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's hedging his bets
a SCOTUS that will will overturn his impeachment guilty verdict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Or he's nominating Roberts, knowing he won't be accepted,
so he can slide someone more repulsive in. Who knows how their evil minds work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pepperlove Donating Member (345 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. And whatever * pushes thru....
will remain (loyal to him) for many many years!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. We lost for the next 2 generations, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. It is my belief that nothing Bush has done is legal because of Selection
2000



I'm one of those people who hasn't gotten over it....and I don't plan on getting over it either.

The original outrage was Selection 2000 - ALL other outrages stem directly from that one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree.
He's not the president. All of his foolish, murderous actions should be undone by the next real president, if we ever get one. If it's possible.

I hate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AverageJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Agreed
We are an occupied nation under the thumb of a gang of thugs who staged a SCOTUS-sanctioned coup. Nothing they have done should carry the weight of law. The fact that the rest of the government goes along with their terroristic control of this nation speaks volumes about the sorry state of affairs to which we have sunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. domination
is his game. Complete one-party, fundamentalist rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Shrub must owe Roberts big time. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Has to be the other way round
Bush doesn't do favors. He collects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. He does both. When it comes to money, he pays back 1000 fold. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. Either Edith F. Jones, or worse yet
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 08:38 AM by Dudley_DUright
Janice F. Brown. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. Just once
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 08:41 AM by Patsy Stone
I want to be able to go to sleep, wake up in the morning, and find that he has not found another way to hurt America or kill more Americans. Today is clearly not that day.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. two possible explanations:
a). bush feels that roberts will be someone who takes dictation, i.e., bush's dictation.

b). bush is using the roberts nomination to take the focus off of the obliteration of NO caused by the massive funding cuts (44% cut) for the strenghtening of levees and flood prevention in NO...and off of the subsequent militarization of NO by our now established GESTAPO: HOMELAND SECURITY.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. Anybody who's lost two buildings and a major US city under his watch
should not be making any decisions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Excellent point!
I'd add "stole two elections".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. Hey, if a horsebreeder can run FEMA
What's the problem with a new lawyer being on the Supreme Court? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MojoXN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. Shouldn't we point out to the pResident...
That now is NOT the time to be taking political action. There are people suffering, and he's playing politics as usual? Where's the outrage from the right on that one, huh? Huh? Well, Bushites, why aren't you FURIOUS that the pResident could be so insensitive at a time like this? My, your moral outrage must have a fucking on/off switch, otherwise you'd be as incensed as I am right now.

MojoXN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC